Typology as an Approach to language Flashcards

1
Q

How do we know about the world’s language?

What is typology in this context?

A

Typology = EMPIRICAL STUDY on LINGUISTIC DIVERSITY

  • need data from many langs
  • typologists rarely collect own data in field
Larger languages:
- Native speakers’ knowledge.
- Literary traditions.
- Large online corpora.
 E.g. BNC for English.
- Readily accessible speakers

Large langs better known by linguists, MINORITY from view of typology

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

How many languages in the world?

A

There are more than 6,000 languages in the world.
> Only about 25+ spoken by more than 50 millions speakers

  1. Mandarin
  2. Spanish
  3. English
  4. Hindi
  5. Arabic
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Linguistic Diversity - proportional langs spoken by the worlds population

A

96% world pop speaks 4% of worlds langs

4% of the world pop speaks 96% of worlds langs

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What continent has the most languages?

A

africa > asia > pacific > americas > europe > middle east

papua new guinea has >800!!

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

how does typology treat all the langs/linguistic diversity?

A
  • Each lang is a datapoint for typology
  • tells us something about what a possible language is
  • Small languages are no less valid wrt these questions.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Threat on linguistic diversity

A
  • Languages die and emerge naturally.
  • Globalization is an accelerator.
  • A language disappears every 2 weeks.

We lose access to data points!

  • many datapoints already unaccessible (dead/disappeared langs)
  • Independent of globalization.
  • And those that do not exist yet.

EMERGING LANGS: creoles, mixed langs

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

How do we know about the world’s language?

Where do grammars come from?

A

field work

  1. Record speech.
  2. Transcribe.
  3. Compile in a searchable corpus.
  4. Analyse.
  5. Go back to the field, double check.
  6. Write a grammar.

 + Language documentation.
 Produce texts, videos…
 A more embodied trace of the language.

long process, hard work, part of the work extremely empirical.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Language description

A

Typology influences datacollection/analysis

Lang description = CUMULATIVE
progress , also thanks to typology

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Typology and descriptions: a bundle of subfields

A

Closely associated:
 Typology.
 Descriptive linguistics.
 Language documentations.

COMBINE within approach of “FUNCTIONALISM”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Typologists vs Generativists

A

Typology > Descriptive Linguistics > Functionalism

Generativists > formalism > universal grammar (CHOMSKY)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Generative linguistics

A

Noam Chomsky (1965)
 Concept of innate Universal Grammar.
 Therefore it has to be the same for all humans.
 Linguistic diversity as a twist to Universal Grammar.
- Look beyond the surface
- idea of DEEP structure of languages

> Find out about cognition from the structure of language.
 // Typologists.
But one language is enough.
 # Typologists.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Functionalism

A
  • Functionalists reject movement.
  • The surface is the object.
  • There is no underlying deep structure.
  • Explanations must remain within the realm of the visible.
  • The functions of linguistic structures are in focus.
  • Hence the label functionalism.

 Multiplicity of languages tells about ‘underlying’ structures.
 More empirical.
 Does empirical mean superficial?

 Generative vs functionalists

  • The mechanics and the engineer?
  • Empirical observation grounds science
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Generativists core values
vs
Typologists core values

A

Unique biological explanation:
language universals are innate
properties of human beings

  • expect unity
    -grammar is innate
  • grammar is syntax
    > usage irrelevant to theory

Multiple explanations combining cognition, social structures, cultural differences

  • explain diversity
  • grammar emerges from interaction
  • grammar is form and function
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

what do generativists and typologists have in common?

A

Ultimately both looking for universals of human cognition

  • different paths
  • different explanations
  • same search
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly