Typology as an Approach to language Flashcards
How do we know about the world’s language?
What is typology in this context?
Typology = EMPIRICAL STUDY on LINGUISTIC DIVERSITY
- need data from many langs
- typologists rarely collect own data in field
Larger languages: - Native speakers’ knowledge. - Literary traditions. - Large online corpora. E.g. BNC for English. - Readily accessible speakers
Large langs better known by linguists, MINORITY from view of typology
How many languages in the world?
There are more than 6,000 languages in the world.
> Only about 25+ spoken by more than 50 millions speakers
- Mandarin
- Spanish
- English
- Hindi
- Arabic
Linguistic Diversity - proportional langs spoken by the worlds population
96% world pop speaks 4% of worlds langs
4% of the world pop speaks 96% of worlds langs
What continent has the most languages?
africa > asia > pacific > americas > europe > middle east
papua new guinea has >800!!
how does typology treat all the langs/linguistic diversity?
- Each lang is a datapoint for typology
- tells us something about what a possible language is
- Small languages are no less valid wrt these questions.
Threat on linguistic diversity
- Languages die and emerge naturally.
- Globalization is an accelerator.
- A language disappears every 2 weeks.
We lose access to data points!
- many datapoints already unaccessible (dead/disappeared langs)
- Independent of globalization.
- And those that do not exist yet.
EMERGING LANGS: creoles, mixed langs
How do we know about the world’s language?
Where do grammars come from?
field work
- Record speech.
- Transcribe.
- Compile in a searchable corpus.
- Analyse.
- Go back to the field, double check.
- Write a grammar.
+ Language documentation.
Produce texts, videos…
A more embodied trace of the language.
long process, hard work, part of the work extremely empirical.
Language description
Typology influences datacollection/analysis
Lang description = CUMULATIVE
progress , also thanks to typology
Typology and descriptions: a bundle of subfields
Closely associated:
Typology.
Descriptive linguistics.
Language documentations.
COMBINE within approach of “FUNCTIONALISM”
Typologists vs Generativists
Typology > Descriptive Linguistics > Functionalism
Generativists > formalism > universal grammar (CHOMSKY)
Generative linguistics
Noam Chomsky (1965)
Concept of innate Universal Grammar.
Therefore it has to be the same for all humans.
Linguistic diversity as a twist to Universal Grammar.
- Look beyond the surface
- idea of DEEP structure of languages
> Find out about cognition from the structure of language.
// Typologists.
But one language is enough.
# Typologists.
Functionalism
- Functionalists reject movement.
- The surface is the object.
- There is no underlying deep structure.
- Explanations must remain within the realm of the visible.
- The functions of linguistic structures are in focus.
- Hence the label functionalism.
Multiplicity of languages tells about ‘underlying’ structures.
More empirical.
Does empirical mean superficial?
Generative vs functionalists
- The mechanics and the engineer?
- Empirical observation grounds science
Generativists core values
vs
Typologists core values
Unique biological explanation:
language universals are innate
properties of human beings
- expect unity
-grammar is innate - grammar is syntax
> usage irrelevant to theory
Multiple explanations combining cognition, social structures, cultural differences
- explain diversity
- grammar emerges from interaction
- grammar is form and function
what do generativists and typologists have in common?
Ultimately both looking for universals of human cognition
- different paths
- different explanations
- same search