Morphology - BASICS Flashcards
Morpheme definition
Minimal unit that bears meaning in language.
Types of morphemes
- Free or bound
- Root, stem, clitic
Mode of attatchmentL
different affixes that attatch to eachother in different ways
What is freedom of occurrence in a morpheme
Whether a morpheme is free or bound.
Free morphemes
a morpheme can be a word: “soon” - smallest unit of meaning
Bound morphemes
Morphemes that are not words are bound!
» Affixes are bound.
He walked. *He –ed.
> > lexical words can also be bound (in many langs):
EG Verbs in Dalabon
EG Rembarrnga - classes of bound nouns (some bound, some not) *djarra = head djarra-na = his head
Bound»_space; Root/stem/affixes
Word boundaries
How do we decide that a block is a word or not? not two?
- Phonology - stress. pauses not possible
- Morphophonemic phenomena at word boundaries.
E.g. French liaison.
ORTHOGRAPHY is NOT a good indicator
Affixes and clitics
Affixes are bound morphemes.
» Highly specified in distribution. E.g. verbal, nominal…
Clitics are ‘halfway’ between free morphemes and affixes.
» Symbols = vs –
» Proclitics and enclitics = Transparent labels!
Clitics are not free morphemes because
NOT independent > Nor phonologically. -> Not independent phonological words. > Neither syntactically. ->Cannot occur without a head.
Jane’s blue dress.
*’s blue dress.
Clitics are not affixes because
Their distribution is often more flexible.
»They typically afford a larger range of heads
- She’s in Europe.
-The weather’s awful.
> > some things can come between clitics and their heads (french example)
> > Affixes are closer to the root. Clitics are further out
Clitics
Probably a fuzzy category.
Not always easy to decide.
In some languages the properties combine.
E.g. polysynthetic Guniwnyguan languages (Australia)
Roots
Roots are not the same as free morphemes.
» Not all roots are free.
» Some must have affixes to be well-formed words.
They are the greater common denominator - after removing suffixes
Stems
The part of the words to which affixes attach
EG italian STEM parli- parla- parle-
ROOT
parl
parl
parl
> > often the same as the root
TYPES OF AFFIXES
prefixes suffixes infixes circumfixes reduplication non-segmental
+portmanteau
They combine - can be several of each
- always relative to the root - not to other affixes
Prefixes
left of the root
Suffixes
right of the root
Infixes
Inside the root.
circumfixes
On each side of the root.
> I.e. in two parts.
Infixes and circumfixes
Rare.
> Cognitive factors?
- The middle of the root is the least salient part.
=> Infixes not effective in language processing?
- Circumfixes are disruptive.
+ not economical
Reduplication
All or part of the word is repeated.
(Not an affix strictly speaking.)
> > Must have consistent meaning to be a morpheme.
- This meaning must be regular and productive.
NOT French pipi ‘wee’ and caca ‘poo’ - *pi *ca
Lexical reduplication is NOT morphological reduplication.
NOT RARE
Natural occurrence in early acquisition.
- Pragmatic association with children
- maintain in adult linguistic abilities?
Suprasegmental
(Not affixes strictly speaking.) >Tone. >Stress. > Phonological transformation. >> E.g. nasalization
kakataibo (peru)
Nasalization of imperatives expresses anger
Portmanteau
Morphemes that encapsulte different meanings/functions.
»Which are commonly expressed by different forms.
»_space;> E.g. verbal prefixes merging A + O + tense
TAM categories are merged in many languages
EG. most romance languages
> in most langs person and number are merged
CROSS-LINGUISTIC TRENDS
suffixes vs prefixes
Notable cross-linguistic PREF for SUFFIXES
> Varies according to basic constituent order.
» Verb FINAL languages: 1P:5S
» Verb MEDIAL languages: 1P:2S
» (Still more frequent in verb final languages, but less.)
Internal explanation for cross-ling suffix preference
Remember the category harmony principle.
> Verb initial (VO) is head-dependent.
> Suffix (root+suff) is also head-dependent.
External explanation for cross-ling suffix preference
Principles of language change.
> Notion of grammaticalization.
Grammaticalization
Free lexical morpheme grammaticalizes into bound affix.
> Semantic generalization.
> Phonological reduction.
EG SWAHILI (bantu) Step 1: Semantic generalization: ‘want (something to happen in the future) --> FUTURE Step 2: Phonological reduction: taka --> ta-
if the lexical verb occurs BEFORE the verb describing the want = Results in a PREFIX
if the lexical item was placed AFTER the verb = result in a SUFFIX
Lexical items tend to become affixes
to elements that precede them.
> Results in creating more suffixes than prefixes.