Morphology - inflection derivation, ordering, morph profiles Flashcards

1
Q

GENERAL definition of Inflection and Derivation

A

INFLECTIONAL morphology: grammatical information

DERIVATIONAL morphology:
robust semantic/lexical info

they have contrasting properties

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Derivational Morphology properties summary

A
  1. Substantial Semantic Effect
  2. Can ALTER WORD CLASS
  3. partly idiosyncratic semantic predictability
  4. RESTRICED productivity
  5. DOESN’T occur in PARADIGMS
  6. INNER location
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Inflectional Morphology properties summary

A
  1. Minor semantic effect
  2. NEVER ALTERS word Class
  3. PREDICTABLE semantic change
  4. UNRESTRICTED productivity
  5. DOES occur in PARADIGMS
  6. PERIPHERAL location
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

INFLECTION AND DERIVATION - Semantic effect

A

Derivation: defines/changes lexical meaning.
» Root/lexeme becomes another lexeme.

Inflection: root/lexeme does not change meaning.
»It is grammatically modulated. I.e. inflected (‘bent’).

Teach = activity
DERIVATION:
teach-er = person
INFLECTION:
t-aught = activity, past
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

INFLECTION AND DERIVATION - effect on word class

A
  • correlates with semantic effect
  • ALL Derivation produces NEW lexemes => potential change in word class
    » Inflection cant change class because it does not produce new lexeme
Teach = activity VERB
DERIVATION:
teach-er = person NOUN
INFLECTION:
t-aught = activity, past VERB

not all derivations affect word class -
do (activity - VERB) –> re-do (diff activity - VERB)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

INFLECTION AND DERIVATION - Semantic predictability

A
  • Inflection is 100% predicable.
  • Derivation is not entirely regular, therefore not predictable (or very partially).

DERIVATION
orphan-age pilgrim-age leaf-age

INFLECTION
dog-s car-s cake-s

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

INFLECTION AND DERIVATION - Productivity

A

-Inflection is productive.
» E.g. plural -s applies to most nouns.(Few exceptions)

-Derivation is semi-productive
» Eg. nominalizer -th

ADJ --> NOUNS
deep     depth
wide      width
short      *shortth
big          *bigth
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

INFLECTION AND DERIVATION: Paradigms

A

Inflectional affixes belong to paradigms.
PARADIGM = Closed sets where forms are mutually exclusive WITH Conflicting grammatical meaning.

derivational affixes do not belong in paradigms

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

INFLECTION AND DERIVATION: Distance from the root

A
  • Derivation is CLOSER to the root.
  • Inflection is FURTHER from the root.

> > A good test when they combine in the same word.
EG grammaticalised
{grammar} {-ical} {-ise} {-d}
root -der -der -inf

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Exceptions to criteria of inflection and derivation

A

As usual, these criteria ‘leak’
EG -ing in English
1. Their constant fight-ing kept us awake.
2. Her loud chew-ing is very annoying.
3. These happen-ing-s are hard to explain

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

INFLECTION AND DERIVATION:

Categorical distinction or continuum?

A
  1. Affixes like -ing suggest a continuum (Bybee 1985).
    »But typological evidence argues for categorical

Implicational scale: inflection > derivation
Gbergs universal 29:
If a language has inflection, it always has derivation.

  1. Portmanteau do not combine inflection and derivation. (Andersen (1992))
    » Suggests a functional distinction between the two.
  2. some ‘cognitive’ evidence in favor of categories.
    » Patients with APHASIA LOSE INFLECTIONAL morphology. But RETAIN DERIVATIONAL morphology.
    »> Stored in separate locations in the brain?

categories with exceptions?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Inflectional Ordering

A

Stacked inflectional affixes occur in predictable order.
Gbergs Universal 39:
- Where morphemes of BOTH NUMB+CASE are present
- and both follow or both precede the noun base,
- the expression of NUMB almost always comes BETWEEN the
NOUN base and the expression of CASE.
ROOT-NUMB-CASE

> strong tendency for following ordering (bybee 1985)/mirror image
> when these categories fall on the same side of the root

Bybee’s prediction
verb root + voice + A + T + M + person/number

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Morphological diversity

A

Significant diversity in how languages handle morphology.
>The first field of typology.
> As early as 19th century.

Resulted in two indices:

  1. Index of synthesis.
  2. Index of fusion.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Index of synthesis

A

Stacking morphemes together or keeping them apart > Extreme cases:
Mandarin: M M M M
West Greenlandic: MMMMM

> Notion of ‘CATEGORY PER WORD’ VALUE (based on inflections)
paint: 1, painted 2
= synthesis degree
Vietnamese: 0
English: 2
Koasati (Luisiana): 13
ISOLATING LANGUAGES:
Mandarin 
SYNTHETIC LANGUAGES:
Most langs. English
POLYSYNTHETIC LANGS:
West greenlandic

ITS A CONTINUUM

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Index of synthesis: ISOLATING LANGUAGES

A

Mandarin
- Each/most phonological word is a single morpheme.
» Many isolating languages in East Asia.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Index of synthesis: SYNTHETIC LANGUAGES

A

-Many phonological words are morphologically complex.

|&raquo_space; Most languages in the world.

17
Q

Index of synthesis: POLYSYNTHETIC LANGUAGES

A

West greenlandic

  • Phonological words number many morphemes.
  • In particular in verb complexes.
  • CONSISTENT profile
  • verb template = “TEMPLATIC languages”
  • noun incorporation
  • non-configurationality

SO: Polysynthetic languages have comparable properties.
>Even when geographically distant.
» Meso- and North America, Australia, Siberia.

18
Q

Index of fusion

A

Whether morphemes are identifiable or collapsed.
» Fusional or agglutinative.

Fusional: Yekwana (Cariban, South America), Oral french:
idk: je sais pas VS je-(ne-)sais-pas

Agglutinative: Murinh Patha (Australia)

ITS A CONTINUUM

19
Q

Synthesis and fusion are ‘orthogonal’

A

STATISTICALLY INDEPENDENT
> Obviously isolating languages cannot be fusional.
> But (poly)synthetic languages can be more or less fusional

20
Q

Historical trends of synthesis and fusion

A

Natural trend is TOWARD synthesis and fusion.
» DUE 2 grammaticalization.

But then large phonological words can break apart?
&raquo_space; Evans et al. (2008) on DALABON.
And the cycle starts again?