Tort Law Flashcards
What is negligence?
It is based on a duty of care and has a 3 stage test
What is the first stage of negligence?
It must be proved that D owes the C a duty of care - In Donoghue v Stevenson, it was held that you owe a duty of care to anyone who is your neighbor; anyone directly affected by your actions
What are the two different ways to prove a duty of care for the first stage of negligence?
If there is an obvious duty of care, only Robinson needs to be applied, not the Caparo test
If the duty of care is not obvious, the Caparo v Dickman test must be applied
What is the Caparo v Dickman test?
a) Was the loss/damage reasonable foreseeable? (Kent v Griffiths)
b) Was there a relationship of close proximity; legal or physical? (Bourhill v Young)
c) Is it fair, just and reasonable to impose a duty of care? - based on public policy (Hill v Chief Constable)
What are the side rules for the Caparo test?
Police Officers - Robinson, owe a duty of care to avoid causing injury by positive act
Emergency worker - Osman v UK, they can be sued if risk of harm is substantially higher
Insurance - If D has insurance then it is usually fair
What is the second stage of negligence?
The D must have breached the duty to the C
What is a breach of duty and what comes under it?
Defined by Alderson B in Blythe v Birmingham as “Doing something a reasonable person would do or not doing something a reasonable person would do” and the D is judged by a reasonable person of a characteristic as well as risk factors which are taken into account
What are the three characteristics?
If D is an expert in a particular skill, they are judged by the standards of another expert (Bolam/Bolitho)(However, if another body of the medical profession agrees with the doctor, they are not negligent)
If D is inexperienced/learner, they will be judged by the standards of someone competent (Nettleship V Weston)
Children will be judged by the standards of another child (Mullins V Richard)
What are the three risk factors?
Magnitude of risk, Probability of harm, Cost and practicality of precautions
What is the magnitude of the risk?
The court needs to take into account the seriousness of the risk; the bigger the risk. the more precautions need to be put in place (Paris V Stepney council)
What is the probability of harm?
If there is a higher probability of harm, more care would need to be taken; a reasonable person need not take precautions against every small risks but against the big risks/ones more likely to occur (Bolton V Stone)
What is the cost and practicality of precautions?
If the cost of taking precautions to rewove the risk is too great, the D may not be in breach of duty (Latimer)
What is the side rule under stage 2 of negligence?
SIDE RULE: Social utility of the risk - If the risks have benefit for society, the D will not be in breach of duty (Watt v Herefordshire council)
What is the third stage of negligence?
The breach must cause the damage
What are factual and legal causation defined as?
Factual, “But for?” test (Barnett v Chelsea Hospital)
Legal, remoteness of the damage - reasonably foreseeable or too remote (Wagon Mound No. 1)
What is the side rule for the third stage of negligence?
SIDE RULE: D doesn’t need to foresee the manner in which the injury was caused as long as the injury type was foreseeable (Hughes v Lord Advocate)
What intervening act comes under the third stage of negligence?
Thin skull rule: you must take your C as you find them (Robinson V Post Office)(Smith v Leech Brain Co)
What is the first stage of psychiatric injury?
The C must be suffering from a recognised psychiatric injury, rather than just ordinary human emotion (Reilly v Merseyside Health Authority)
The C must show that this wads caused by a traumatic event or an “attack on the senses” (Sion v Hampstead Health Authority)
What is the second stage of psychiatric injury?
Was the C a primary or secondary victim?
What is a secondary victim and what comes under it?
Unwillling witnesses to the incident but not personally in danger of harm
Secondary victims must establish the “control mechanisms” as given by Alcock and updated in Paul, Polmear and Purchase
What is a primary victim and what comes under it?
Somebody who reasonable fears for their own safety or is within the zone of danger
Page v Smith established a 2 stage test: Must show that some type of physical injury was foreseeable, but not psychiatric
Don’t need to be a person of normal fortitude
What are all the control mechanisms?
Love: must be close ties of love and affection between the primary victim
Witness: must witness the traumatic incident or its immediate aftermath with your own unaided senses (McLoughlin v O’Brian)
Perceived: must have directly seen it; not heard through phone or seen on tv
Causation: Sufficient enough for there to be a link between incident and psychiatric injury with the incident as the cause
What are the side rules for the second stage of psychiatric injury?
Rescuers: If they are a primary victim, they can claim; if they are secondary, they must fulfill control mechanisms (Chadwick v British Transport)
Bystanders: cannot claim unless they fulfill control mechanisms (McFarlane)
What is nuisance and what comes under it?
The unlawful/unreasonable interference with a persons use or enjoyment of land
The C must demonstrate a legal interest in the land affected to claim (Hunter v Canary Wharf)
Lord Goff in Cambridge Water: the fact that the D has taken all reasonable steps will not exonerate him