Stat Interpretation (Criminal) Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

What is the Golden Wide Rule?

A

When words in a rule only have one meaning but it leads to an absurd outcome so the rule is used to avoid that.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What is the Golden Narrow Rule?

A

When a word has more than one meaning and the Court is allowed to choose whichever meaning to follow

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What is the Literal Rule?

A

The Judge must words in the Act must be given their literal and ordinary meaning and must not be changed.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What is the Mischief Rule?

A

The Judge reads the Act intending to discover what mischief the Act was made to solve and the best way to remedy that mischief

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What is the case for the Golden Narrow Rule?

A

R V Allen:
The case involved the word ‘marry’ in the case of bigamy, which was decided to have two meanings: ‘to be legally married to someone’ or ‘to have a marriage ceremony’ - bigamy would’ve been impossible given the first meaning so the judge chose the second meaning to ensure Allen was guilty

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What is the Purposive Rule?

A

The Judge reads the Act in order to understand the general purpose rather than just the ‘Mischief’

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What is the case for the Mischief Rule?

A

Smith v Hughes: Prostitutes harassing men walking in the street but they weren’t literally “on the street” - the mischief was harassments and to stop solicitation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What is the case for the Purposive Rule?

A

Royal College of Nurses v DHSS:

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What is the case for the Golden Wide Rule?

A

Re Sigsworth - son killed his mother, no other inheritors of her assets except him, judge was given freedom to avoid an absurd outcome

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What is the case for the Literal Rule?

A

Cheeseman v DPP: Man masturbating in public, was only an offence if he was exposed to “passengers” so they had to be on the move which the police officers weren’t

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What does the judge do if they don’t know the meaning of a word?

A

Use a dictionary of the same year the act was published

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What are Internal Aids and examples?

A

Things that help the judge: Title and summary of the Act

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What are External Aids and examples?

A

Things that help the judge which aren’t from the Act: Hansard, dictionary, case law from other places

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Advantages of Literal Rule?

A

Respects Parliamentary sovereignty, easy to use

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Disadvantages of Literal Rule?

A

Can lead to absurd outcome, words can have multiple meanings, can be rigid and inflexible

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Advantages of Mischief, Purposive and Golden Rule?

A

Can avoid absurd outcome, allow judges to adapt to modern society, flexible

16
Q

Disadvantages of Mischief, Purposive and Golden Rule?

A

Doesn’t respect Parliamentary sovereignty, possibly undemocratic