Topic 3: Motivation Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

What did Munroe and Chandler investigate

A

Relationship between imagery/self confidence/self efficacy

Key research

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

M+C aim

A

To investigate relationship between imagery (MG-M)/self cofidence/self efficacy
Specifically to see if younger athletes showed same benefits as adults

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

M+C sample

A

122 m+f soccer players
Canadian
11-14 y/o
Over 6 years mean experience

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

M+C Method

A

.parental and participant consent obtained
.demographics questionnaire taken (age, gender etc)
.3 measures taken: imagery, self.c, self.e
.P’s take sports imagery questionnaire (imagery), CTAI-2C questionnaire (self.c) and self efficacy questionnaire (self. e)
.questionnaires took 15 mins approx

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

M+C results

A

All imagery subscales correlated strongly and positively

MG-M subscale was strongest correlation with both SEQ and CTAI-2C scores

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

M+C conclusion

A

MG-M is a strong predictor of self confidence and self efficacy regardless of age

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Vealy’s model

A

model of sport confidence

3 aspects affecting sport confidence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Vealy’s 3 aspects

A

Trait sport confidence
State sport confidence
Competitive orientation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

trait sport confidence

A

.your belief in your general sports ability

.based on previous experience

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

state sport confidence

A

.ability to perform in specific sporting context e.g pen in football/free throw in b.ball
.confidence can change quite quickly

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

competitive orientation

A

drive to succeed/how they define sporting success in a given situation
.are they driven by outcome orientation or performance orientation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

outcome orientation

A

driven by winning

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

performance orientation

A

driven by performing well

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What did Bandura investigate

A

sporting self efficacy

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Bandura high self efficacy

A

individual know what is required from them and is confident they can do it successfully

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Bandura low self efficacy

A

individual is unclear on what is needed to be successful or if they do know, is not confident on being able to do it

17
Q

Bandura 4 factors effecting self efficacy

A

previous personal achievement
vicarious experience
verbal persuasion
emotional arousal

18
Q

previous personal achievement

A

better past experiences = higher self efficacy

19
Q

vicarious experience

A

is we see someone similar to us demonstrate a skill we are more likely to think we can do it

20
Q

verbal persuasion

A

encouraging praise can lead to higher belief/self efficacy

21
Q

emotional arousal

A

need to be emotionally ready and optimally aroused

22
Q

What did Van Raalte investigate

A

self talk

23
Q

self talk def

A

deliberate statements made by an athlete during a performance
can be positive or negative
can be focused on task of confidence

24
Q

instructional self talk

A

self talk focused on the task or aspects of it

25
Q

motivational self talk

A

self talk focused on improving confidence

26
Q

Van Raalte sample

A

60 undergraduates

all male

27
Q

Van Raalte procedure

A

.randomly assigned to p.s.t/n.s.t/control group
.positive repeated “you can do it!
.negative repeated “you cannot do it”
.control said nothing
.15 dart throws, measured mean distance away from centre bull

28
Q

Van Raalte results

A

positive showed better accuracy than negative (P<0.05)

no sig dif between negative and control

29
Q

What did Epstein investigate

A

underaged girls

TARGET approach

30
Q

TARGET approach

A
Tasks
Authority
Reward
Grouping
Evaluation
Timing
31
Q

Epstein: Task

A

.ensure training is varied and challenging

.focus on new skills rather than comparison

32
Q

Epstein: authority

A

let athletes make own decisions and evaluate themselves

33
Q

Epstein: reward

A

focus rewards on individual improvement rather than comparing

34
Q

Epstein: grouping

A

give chances to work together rather than against each other

35
Q

Epstein: evaluating

A

.specific feedback on how to improve

.focused on effort

36
Q

Epstein: timing

A

.give enough time for mastery of skills

.give feedback ASAP