Topic 1 - Affiliation Flashcards
What are the 3 reasons people are so important?
- health
- cooperation
- cultural transmission
Health?
- Berkman & Breslow carried out a 20 year longitudinal study and found:
-> those with the fewest relationships are twice as likely to die
-> social support protects against depression
-> providing social support may be more important than receiving it
Cooperation?
- cooperation is important in trading, hunting and warfare
- Newson found that inter-group violence supports social cohesion in Brazilian football fans
Cultural transmission?
- humans spend 20% waking time in conversation
- Dunbar found that when monitoring dining hall conversations social relationships and personal experiences took up 70% of conversation time
What is Sternberg’s Triarchic model of love?
- intimacy = closeness & understanding
- passion = physical/ sexual attraction/ romance
- commitment = the cognitive factors such as the decision to maintain the relationship
What is passion according to Hatfield & Walster?
an intense longing for union with the other
What are the 3 parts of the passionate love scale?
- cognitive = intrusive thinking or preoccupation with the partner
- affective = attraction to the partner, especially sexual attraction
- behavioural = maintaining physical closeness
How does Fisher split sexual from romantic passion in 3 independent systems supporting relationship behaviour?
- lust/ sex drive = testosterone mediated
- attraction = dopamine mediated
- attachment = oxytocin mediated
How do we choose who were friends with?
- proximity
- similarity
- reciprocity
How do we chose who we love?
- proximity
- similarity
- reciprocity
- physical attraction
Proximity?
- people who are geographically near you are more likely to become your friends
- the mere act of being exposed to some things can lead to increased liking of those things
- for example studies have found that sitting in neighbouring seats predicts friendship intensity 1 year later
- it has also been found that students rate classroom visitors they see more often more positively
Similarity?
- Newcomb found in a student accommodation study that similarity of attitudes predicted friendships
- similarity in attitudes directly relates to liking/ attraction
- we dislike those who beliefs/ actions differ from ours
Similarity in romantic attraction?
- similarity is attractive because:
-> its easy to interact with people who are similar to us because we can instantly agree on a wide range of issues
-> when someone shares our attitudes and beliefs we feel a bit more confident that those attitudes and beliefs are correct
-> if we like people who share our attitudes and beliefs we can expect them to like us for the same reason and being liked is a powerful source of attraction
-Byrne et al 1970:
-> paired blind dates as either similar or dissimilar
-> found that similarity was a strong predictor of attraction - but the role of similarity depends on how much commitment is desired:
-> similarity is desired for committed relationships
-> but for ‘flings’ dissimilarity is desired
Reciprocity?
- we like people who like us and trust us
- reciprocity can make up for absence of similarity
What is the social exchange theory?
- based on the principles of rewards and costs in interactions
- rewards = love, companionship, support etc.
- costs = conflict, uncertainty, stress etc.
How do people evaluate their outcomes?
- keep track of rewards and costs
- determine profit
-> simple standard
-> comparison level (CL)
-> comparison level for alternative (CLALT)
Simple standard?
- calculate profit by doing:
outcome (profit) = rewards - costs - however people don’t just want profit they want the best possible outcome
Comparison level?
- this is what we expect and feel we deserve from our relationship
- satisfaction = outcome - CL
- each person has his/ her own CL
- is based off prior experience, learning and personality
- relationships that meet/ exceed expectations are more satisfying
What does a high CL mean?
- expect relationship to be rewarding
- low reward are unacceptable/ disappointing
What does a low CL mean?
- expect relationships to be troublesome
- low rewards are acceptable/ tolerable
Comparison level for alternatives?
- this is what we expect we could get elsewhere
- is the standard against we decide to stay or leave
- dependence (aka commitment) = outcome - CLALT
What is dependence/ commitment?
- the degree to which we feel psychologically linked to our relationship
- it determines whether we are motivated to stay or leave
- is not based solely on whether or not we’re happy
What does a low CLALT mean?
- more commitment to current relationship even if costly
What does a high CLALT mean?
- less commitment to current relationship
What is the equity theory?
- idea that people feel most comfortable when they get roughly what they deserve
- partners are concerned with fairness
- inequity causes distress
- partners will take steps to restore equity
What is the difference between equity and equality?
- equality = partners obtain equal rewards from the relationship
- equity = ratio of rewards
-> relative profits should be equal
-> don’t have to have the same rewards, just the same balance