Lecture 7 - Theory of mind Flashcards
1
Q
What are the 3 definitions of the theory of mind?
A
- The ability to attribute mental states to oneself and others (Premack & Woodruff 1978)
- ‘Theory of mind underlies the ability to explain, predict and interpret actions and speech by attributing mental states - such as beliefs, desires, intentions and emotions - to oneself and to other people’ (Astington & Hughes 2013)
- This involves understanding alternative perspectives and decentring from egocentric representations (Piaget)
2
Q
Failures in theory of mind?
A
- Children need exposure and experience of the world to develop this
- A good e.g. is hide and seek
- Young children often stand in plain sight and cover their eyes
- Here they fail to appreciate others can see when they can’t
3
Q
What is false belief?
A
- the understanding that someone can have a different view to your own
- demonstrating false belief shows theory of mind
4
Q
The maxi task - Wimmer and Perner?
A
- children are told a story about a boy called Maxi, they see toy characters and cupboards too
- maxi’s puts chocolate into a cupboard but his mum moves it
- younger children can’t work out that Maxi doesn’t know it has moved – they can’t assign a false belief to him
- the conclusion is that Theory of Mind develops at 5 years or more
5
Q
Sally Anne task?
A
- Sally puts a ball in her basket
- Then she leaves
- Anne moves the ball to a box
- Where will Sally look for the ball?
- Results: 3 year olds fail but 4 year olds pass
- Conclusion: the Sally-Ann task suggests that the false belief aspect of theory of mind develops at 4 years
6
Q
The smarties task?
A
- Child sees Smarties tube
- E: “What’s in the box?”
- C: “Sweets”
- E shows C that it actually contains pencils
- E: “When your friend comes in I’m going to show her this box. What will she think is in the box?”
- C: 3 yrs: “pencils”. 4 yrs: “sweets”
- E: “What did you think was in the box before it was opened?”
- C: 3 yrs: “pencils”. 4 yrs: “sweets”
- Conclusion: The false belief aspect of ToM, and the ability to have insight into one’s own prior beliefs (‘representational change’) develop at 4 years
7
Q
What is the smarties task measuring?
A
- False belief: He thinks this is X but I think it’s Y
- Representational change: I once thought X but now I think Y
- Appearance-reality: This looks like X but in fact is Y
- Performance on a number of tasks suggests that there might be a universal, stage-like development of theory of mind at around 4-5 years
8
Q
What is a problem with these tasks?
A
- they aren’t straightforward as we have:
-> multiple objects
-> complex sentences
-> people coming and going
-> often run by an unfamiliar adult
9
Q
Woodward?
A
- looked at if infants attend to aspects of an action that are related to the goals of the actor
- a 9 month old baby watches a hand reaching for an object - then the hand reaches for the same object (goal) in a different location or a different object (goal) in the same location
- results: 9-month-olds look longer to the new goal than the new location, 5-month-olds do not show these effects
- conclusion: By 6-9 months, infants perceive not just movement paths, but the relation between an human agent and a goal
- they seem to infer the intentions of the actor (their mental state)
10
Q
False belief in infancy - Onishi & Baillargeon?
A
- Object moves into yellow box, and actor sees the move so has a true belief that it’s in the yellow box
- Object moves into yellow box & back to green, actor does not see the move, so has a false belief that it’s in the yellow box
- On the test trial, the infant either sees the actor look in the green box, or in the yellow box
- In the crucial false belief conditions, will she look longer if the actor looks in the correct box, or in the box where the actor thinks it is?
- Results: babies look longer if the actor looks in the correct box, they expected the actor to look in the incorrect box because they thought the actor had a false belief
- So 15 month olds can notice and learn that someone has a false belief (“it’s in the yellow box”), and use that to predict their behavior (“she should look in the yellow box”)
- If the actor’s behavior goes against that prediction (she looks in the green box), the baby seems surprised (looks longer)
- This study suggests that infants of 15 months possess theory of mind
11
Q
Dualist theory - Clements & Perner?
A
- looks at implicit vs explicit theory of mind
- implicit TOM emerges before 4 years, looking time, pretend play, deception
- explicit emerges at 4 years, verbal performance only
12
Q
The duple task?
A
- 3.5 year olds in this experiment, 80% failed the Smarties task, but 80% passed the Duplo task
- When the Duplo girl disappeared from the scene, 80% failed it, so keeping track of perspective is crucial
- When they made a verbal response, 80% failed it, so avoiding the pull of the real is crucial
- There is no discontinuity in development, but a perspective-tracking system present early on that is initially fragile, this argues against dualist theories