Theory And Methods Flashcards
Quantitative Methods in Research- Positivism
- Positivists:
=society is objective
=discover cause and effects that explain behavioural patterns
=sociology should follow natural sciences
=use quantitative data
=data is reliable and representative
Quantitative Methods in Research- Laboratory Experiments
Overview=artificial / control variables / causal laws / experimental group and control
- Practical issues:
=closed system- only relevant to these as variables can be controlled
=unique individuals
=studying past impossible
=small samples
=Hawthorne effect - Ethical issues:
=informed consent / protection from physical and psych harm - Theoretical issues:
=reliable- standardised / quantitative / objective
=not representative- small samples / lack external validity
Quantitative Methods in Research- Field Experiments
Overview=natural surroundings / do not know in an experiment / researcher manipulates variables
- Actor and correspondence tests:
Brown+Gay=test discrimination in employment- different races same job to see if internal racism - Comparative method:
Alternative to lab
=carried out in mind of sociologist
=identifies two groups that are alike except one variable
=compares them to see if has any effect
Quantitative Methods in Research- Questionnaires
- Practical issues:
=quick, cheap, easy
=don’t need to recruit interviewers
=easily quantified data
=data limited and superficial
=low response rates - Theoretical issues- Positivism:
=hypothesis testing- quantitative data
=reliable
=not representative as low response rate
=generalisability- dependent on sample
=objective
=few ethical issues - Interpretivism and questionnaires:
Cannot yield valid data as no meanings
=detachment- reject objectivity as need subjective understanding
=imposing meanings
=lying, forgetting, trying to impress- lowers validity
Quantitative Methods in Research- Structured Interviews
=structured- standardised questions
=unstructured- open-ended
=semi-structured- mix both
=group- relatively unstructured
- Practical issues:
=quick and cheap
=response rates higher
=only snapshots taken at one time - Ethical issues:
=pressure to answer- conformity
=informed consent and confidentiality - Theoretical issues- Positivism:
=hypothesis testing due to cause and effect
=reliable as standardised
=unrepresentative as interviewees untypical - Interpretivist criticisms:
=lack validity
=cannot uncover meanings - Feminist criticisms:
=relationship between interviewer and interviewee reflects exploitative nature patriarchal relationships
=impose research categories - Interviews as social interactions:
=status differences- honesty
=cultural differences- misunderstanding
=social desirability
=interviewer bias
Quantitative Methods in Research- Official Statistics
=quantitative data created by government or other offices bodies- used in policy making
- Practical issues:
+ easily accessed data for free
+ collected at regular intervals showing trends
~ definitions different from sociologists
~ no stats available on sociologists topics - Theoretical issues- Positivism:
=Positivists- reliable, objective social facts- can develop and test hypotheses
=representative as large scale and good samples
=reliable as standardised - Theoretical issues- Interpretivism:
=reject claim they are social facts because social constructs
=soft stats- less valid compiled from decisions of agencies
=hard stats- more valid - Marxism and stats:
=serve interests of capitalism
=perform ideological function
=definitions conceal reality of capitalism - Feminism and stats:
=patriarchal model of research
=created by state maintains patriarchal oppression- legitimating gender inequality
Qualitative Methods in Research- Interpretivism
- We can only understand people’s actions if we understand their meanings- qualitative methods reveal meanings
=reject claim society is objective reality out there
Qualitative Methods in Research- Unstructured Interviews
=no standardised format- rich data that gives insight into meanings and world of interviewee
- Practical issues:
=training needs to be more thorough
=time-consuming
=flexible with more opportunity for elaboration - Theoretical issues- Interpretivism:
=involvement- more valid data
=interviewees can raise issues
=open-ended questions can reveal true meanings - Theoretical issues- Positivism:
=unreliable as not standardised
=hard to quantify data
=not representative/generalisable as small samples
Qualitative Methods in Research- Participant Observation
=researcher observes while taking part in the group
- Getting in (win group’s trust)/ staying in (involved in group but remain objective)/ getting out
- Practical issues:
Insight / access / flexibility / practical limitations determine whether use PO
=overt PO- behave normally/Hawthorne effect/restricted access
=covert PO- maintain act/take notes in secret/cannot risk altering group’s behaviour - Theoretical issues:
=valid due to involvement and flexible/grounded (Interpretivists)
=unrepresentative as small sample, unreliable as not standardised and bias/lacks objectivity (Positivists)- would prefer NPO - Ethical issues:
=deception / cannot gain informed consent / protection from harm
Qualitative Methods in Research- Documents
=public documents- governments / schools
=personal documents- first-person accounts of events
=historical documents
- Practical issues:
=quick and cheap for large data
=difficulty accessing
=may not answer sociologist’s questions - Theoretical issues:
=valid picture of meanings (Interpretivists)
=may lack validity due to authenticity/credibility/misinterpretation (Positivists)
=unreliable as not standardised- P
=unrepresentative - Ethical issues:
=informed consent varies- difficult for private documents but not for public - Content analysis:
method of analysing documents
=formal content analysis- quant from qual- Positivists like as objective and representative
=thematic analysis- qual from texts- Interpretivists as reveal meanings through themes
Sociology and Science- Positivism
- Apply logic and methods of natural sciences to study of sociology to solve social problems and achieve progress
=society is objective factual reality
=studied through systematic observation and measurement
=discover general laws - Positivist methods:
Natural science experimental method as test hypothesis in systematic way
=quantitative- laws of cause and effect
=experiments and official stats- objectivity and detachment
Sociology and Science- Interpretivism
- Do not believe sociology should adopt methods of natural sciences as unsuited to study of human beings
=internal meanings
=science only laws of cause and effect - Subject matter of sociology:
=natural sciences study matter with no consciousness, sociology study people with consciousness - Interpretivist methods:
Uncover meanings via verstehen (empathetic understanding) - Versions of interpretivism:
=interactionists- causal explanations via bottom-up
=phenomenologists/ethnomethodologists- reject causal explanations as society not real thing out there - Postmodernism and feminism:
=Postmodernists reject sociology as science because meta-narrative- big story claiming monopoly of truth
Sociology and Science- Karl Popper
- Falsificationism=a statement is scientific if it can be proven false by the evidence
- A falsifiable theory must be open to criticism so that flaws can be exposed and better theories developed
- Implications for sociology:
=Marx’s theory of a revolution cannot be falsified
=sociology can be scientific by producing testable hypotheses
Sociology and Science- Thomas Kuhn
- Paradigm=shared framework of beliefs held by members given scientific community
- Paradigm defines what science is and scientists are socialised into it- science cannot exist without shared paradigm
=normal science- paradigm does not go unquestioned and allows accumulation of knowledge
=if too many anomalies are found, confidence in the paradigm declines
=science enters period of crisis
=scientific revolution occurs - Implications for sociology:
=sociology not a science as multiple paradigms- only could become science if disagreements resolved
Sociology and Science- Realism and Science
- Similarity between sociology and natural sciences due to degree of control over variables being researched
- Closed system=researcher controls and measures variables and make precise predictions
- Open system=researcher cannot control and measure variables and cannot make precise predictions
=sociologists study open systems
=Realists reject positivist view science concerned with observable phenomena
Objectivity and Values- Classical Sociologists and Values
- Weber=values can neither be proved or disproved by the facts- they belong to different realms
=values as a guide to research- areas of study selected in terms of value relevance
=data collection and hypothesis testing- must be as objective as possible
=values in interpretation of data- facts influenced by sociologist’s values
=values and sociologist as a citizen- cannot dodge oral issues by hiding behind value freedom - Values are relevant when research topic, research method and use findings put to
Objectivity and Values- Value Freedom and Commitment
- 20th century positivists:
=values irrelevant to research as science concerned with matters of fact
Gouldner=sociologists became spiritless technicians so as to dodge moral issues their work raised - Committed sociology:
=sociologists should identify values and openly take sides - Whose side are we on:
=functionalists/positivists- powerful
=Becker- underdog- should be committed to ending their oppression - Funding and careers:
=government funded research may control direction and what questions asked of the topic - Relativism and postmodernism:
=no group has special access to the truth- any that claims to are just a meta-narrative based on values and assumptions
Functionalism- Durkheim
- Traditional society=mechanical solidarity with little division of labour and everyone is alike- strong collective conscience
- Modern society=complex division of labour promoting differences between groups and weakening social solidarity- freedom must be regulated to prevent egoism destroying social bonds
- Rapid change=undermining old norms throwing people into state of anomie that threatens social cohesion
- Social facts=society is a separate entity existing over and above its members with external social facts shaping their behaviour to serve society’s needs
Functionalism- Society as a System- Organic Analogy
- Parsons
- System
organisms and societies are self-regulating systems of independent parts that fit together in fixed ways
Body=organs Society=institutions - System needs
Social system has basic needs that must be met if it is to survive - Functions
Contribution it makes to meeting system needs and ensuring survival
Functionalism- Society as a System- Value Consensus and Social Order
- social order achieved through agreement on (value consensus) shared culture/central value system
- culture=set of norms, values, beliefs, goals shared by members of society
- social order only possible if value consensus=agreement on norms and values
Functionalism- Society as a System- Integration of Individuals
- value consensus to make social order possible=integrating into social system=directing them towards meeting society’s needs
- Parsons- ensuring conformity to norms and meeting needs- socialisation
teaching individuals to want to do what system requires they do
internalise norms and values=society part of personality - Parsons- ensuring conformity to norms and meeting needs- social control
positive sanctions reward conformity
negative sanctions punish deviance
Functionalism- Society as a System- Parts of Social System
- Parsons building block approach
actions governed by norms
cluster norms=status roles
cluster status role=institution
cluster institution=sub-systems
cluster sub-systems=social system
Functionalism- Society as a System- System’s needs
- Parsons AGIL schema:
- A- adaptation
meets material needs through economic sub-system - G- goal attainment
setting goals and allocating resources falls to political sub-system - I- integration
different parts of system integrated together pursue shared goals=religious sub-system - L- latency
processes that maintain society=kinship sub-system- pattern maintenance and tension management - adaptation and goal attainment=instrumental needs
- integration and latency=expressive needs
Functionalism- Society as a System- Social Change
- Parsons=traditional society
collective interests / ascribed status / particularistic standards - Parsons=modern society
individual interest / achieved status / universalistic standards - Society change=gradual, evolutionary process of increasing complexity and structural differentiation (gradual process in which separate, functionally specialised institutions develop, each meeting different need)
- Gradual change also occurring through dynamic equilibrium=as change in one part of system, compensatory changes in other parts- rise in industry=extended to nuclear
Functionalism- Merton’s Internal Critique
- Indispensability:
Parsons assumes everything in society is functionally indispensable in existing form
=untested assumption- functional alternatives - Functional unity:
Parsons assumes parts of society tightly integrated into single whole and each part functional for rest / change=knock-on-effect on other parts
=neither assumption true- some parts have functional autonomy - Universal functionalism:
Parsons assumes everything in society performs positive function
=some things dysfunctional/conflicts of interest - Manifest (intended) and latent (unintended) functions=hidden connections between social phenomena
Functionalism- External Critiques- Logical
- Teleological=things exist because of their effect/function
- Cause must come before effect but functionalism=effect before cause
- Unscientific=Popper-unfalsifiability=deviance cannot be both functional and dysfunctional
Functionalism- External Critiques- Conflict Perspective (Marxists)
- Inability to explain conflict and change due to organic analogy
- Society is not a harmonious whole=based on exploitation and divided into classes with conflicting interests and unequal power
- Conservative ideology legitimating status quo=helps justify existing social order as inevitable and desirable
Functionalism- External Critiques- Action Perspectives
- Wong=deterministic=individuals are mere puppets whose strings are being pulled by the social system
individuals actually create society by their interactions - Functionalism refies society=treats it as a distinct thing over and above individuals, with its own needs
society is not a thing out there with its own independent existence