the personal life perspective Flashcards
what do the personal life perspective argue?
functionalist, marxist and feminist theories all suffer from two weaknesses
what are the two weaknesses that functionalist, marxist and feminist theories all suffer from?
they all assume the nuclear family is the dominant family type
they are all structural theories and assume that their members are puppets manipulated by the structure of society to perform certain functions
what is a top down approach?
society controls us
what kind of approach do the personal life perspective take?
a bottom up approach - we shape are relationships through our actions
who can be viewed as family according to the personal life perspective?
friends
fictive kin
gay ‘chosen families’
relationships with dead relatives
pets - tipper (2011) found that most children view their pets as part of their family
what does the personal life perspective provide a way of explaining?
diversity of families, households and relationships we find in society today
carol smart
accepts that people now have more freedom to construct their own families
believes that this can’t be done in isolation from the traditions and norms of the families
there is an element of choice but the choices that people are making are:
- embedded in their past experiences or family history
- expectations of society they presently live in
- subject to structural factors such as social class, ethnicity and gender inequality
criticisms
ignores what is special about relationships based on blood or marriage
rejects top down view but sees intimate relationships as performing the important function of providing us with a sense of belonging and relatedness
unlike functionalism, it recognises that relatedness is not always positive
modern perspectives
believe in social progress
social research can reveal the truth about which types of societies are best, and actively work to construct a better society through social policy and more radical means
post modern perspectives
reject the idea of ‘truth’ and the idea that social progress is possible
no longer possible to make generalisations about society in the same way that modernists do