Test 4 Flashcards
Groups naturally occur as a set of _____ people. People prefer ______ groups when interaction is integral to the purpose of the group.
2-6
smaller
Group participation varies as a function of the ______ of people in a group
number
groupiness as a continuum
perceived entativity
Perceiving stimuli to be a single unit (Donald Campbell)
Gestalt psychology
What are the 3 Gestalt principles of groups?
- proximity
- similarity
- common fate (interdependence)
some groups seem to be more cohesive than others
levels of entativity
Intimacy groups (family, close friends) have _______ entativity. Social categories (race, gender) have ________ entativity. Task groups (committee, project team) have _______ entativity. Loose association groups (neighbors) have _______ entativity.
high
low
medium
very low
Entativity varies as a function of the presence of what 5 things?
- common goals
- proximity
- similarity
- high in personal importance
- degree of interaction
Joining a group helps to fulfill the need of _______.
belonging
Identifying with a group can make the self more stable
uncertainty
group members have to understand each other
group culture
if uncertain, people can identify with the group
subjective uncertainty reduction hypothesis
ability to perceive the emotional and psychological state of others due to history of interaction
empathy
groups have their own rules for how to behave
norms
group members delegate different domains of memory expertise to different individuals
transactive memory
it doesn’t take much to create a group
minimal group paradigm
Diverse groups are often less _______. Groups require a level of ________.
stable
homogenity
diverse groups perform better (more flexible and creative; wide range of knowledge)
diversity hypothesis
When looking at the social influence on cockroaches, researchers found that cockroaches performed better on the (simple, complex) maze when in the presence of others.
simple
The presence of others causes an increase in ________ which leads to the amplification of a ________
physiological arousal
dominant response
reducing one’s efforts when in a group
social loafing
in general, groups can get more done than the individual
specialization
enjoying group benefits without having to make the effort to contribute
free ride
wanting to avoid the risk of being the only member of a group contributing to the project
sucker effect
When performing with the group, it actually reduces ______
arousal
result of lack of accountability
social loafing
When are groups loafless? (4 situations)
- the task is meaningful and important
- working with friends
- they have a collectivistic orientation
- personal efforts are identifiable
increased arousal leads to dominant response
social facilitation
acting in accord with a direct order; direct social influence
obedience
a change in behavior or beliefs as a result of real or imagined social pressure; acting differently than you would alone
conformity
publicly acting in accord with social pressure while privately disagreeing (say yes but believe no)
compliance
acting and believing in accord with social pressure (say yes and believe yes)
acceptance
evidence about reality that we get from others; leads to acceptance
informational social influence
What 2 things affect informational influence?
- whether the situation is ambiguous/novel
2. whether the other individuals appear to be “experts”
behavior shaped by a desire to fulfill others expectations (often to gain approval); leads to compliance
normative social influence
creative thinking in groups
brainstorming
Does brainstorming work?
yes and no
Groups are less ______ than individuals.
creative
when groups make decisions they tend to make especially extreme decisions
risky shift
decisions become extreme toward one option over another
group polarization
Groups often fail to engage in ___________ processes
normal problem solving
when group decision making inhibits good problem solving
process loss
One of the most important considerations for making a good decision is __________
considering all relavent info
assuming that other people know something because you know it
common knowledge effect
conscious self-reflection, knowledge that you are being evaluated
self-awareness
knowledge that you will be held responsible for your decisions
accountability
loss of self-awareness that occurs when we lack identifiability; often results in antisocial behavior
deindividuation