task 5 Flashcards
german universities
- used to be dominated by humanities/religion (end of 17th century)
- -> universities based on two pillars
1. ideas of Enlightenment (demystify religion)
2. Pietism (emphasised inward spirituality) - after defeat of Prussians by French (Napoleon) > modernisation of country
- -> universities had two goals:
1. scholarship/scientific research (WISSENSCHAFT)
2. making of good citizens (BILDUNG)
Wilhelm Wundt
- 1832-1920
- first laboratory of experimental psychology (1879)
- first who called himself “psychologist”
- promoted 3 methods for different types of problems:
1. experimental methods
2. introspection
3. historical method
Wilhelm Wundt
|»_space; EXPERIMENTAL METHODS
- psychophysical methods
- -> measurement of duration of simple mental processes
- -> accuracy of reproduction in memory tasks
- based on Fechner’s work (JND)
- -> was purely psychological
- effect of variability & demand characteristics were unknown
demand characteristics
- participants change behaviour when they have information about experiment’s purpose
Wilhelm Wundt
|»_space; INTROSPECTION
- process by which person describes its sensing, thinking, feeling
- based on belief that people have conscious access to own processes & can report them
- was criticised by Kant/Comte before
–> Wundt made distinction:
> INTERNAL PERCEPTION
–> practiced by philosophers
> EXPERIMENTAL SELF-OBSERVATION
–> practiced in highly controlled circumstances
> > Wundt argued that EXPERIMENTAL SELF-OBSERVATION was valid SCIENTIFIC METHOD but internal perception not
Wilhelm Wundt
|»_space; HISTORICAL METHOD
- study of mental differences as revealed by differences between cultures in time/space
- acc. to Wundt: well suited to investigate “higher” functions of mind
- -> social aspect of human thought & behaviour
- development of individual recapitulated evolution of mankind
- -> person’s development could be studied by examining historical development of human race (=Folk psychology)
criticism of Wundt’s methods
- his writings contradicted each other
- -> objectivity vs. introspection (subjective)
- did not contain lasting insights
- never developed a theory
William James
- 1842-1910
- “principles of psychology” (1890)
- one of the fathers of FUNCTIONALISM
- very influential in foundation & expansion of psychology in USA
- defended introspection // didn’t like experimental psychology
- -> functions that consciousness provide are more important than mind
- strongly influenced by evolutionary theory
- -> sought outline functions of human mind for survival
- saw continuity between animal & human behaviour
- -> receptive to COMPARATIVE PSYCHOLOGY
functionalism
- during early American psychology research
- approach that examined practical functions of human mind inspired by evolutionary theory
Edward Titchener
- 1867-1927
- Wundt’s student
- strongly influenced by empiricism & associationism
- promoted STRUCTURALISM
- -> defended INTROSPECTION: participants had to be trained to do it properly
- not very influential because of criticism
structuralism
- study of the elements of consciousness
- idea that conscious experience can be broken down into basic conscious elements
- -> with use of INTROSPECTION
criticism of Titchener
WÜRZBURG SCHOOL & BINET:
- humans are not aware of many thought processes
- -> cannot report them or dissect them
FUNCTIONALISTS:
- not enough practical advantages in knowing precise structure of mind
GESTALT PRINCIPLES:
- humans are more than sum of individual sensations
Theodule Ribot
- 1839-1916
- against Comte’s view:
- -> Comte (positivist): I tell you what science is and what not
- -> reason why France was behind regarding developmental psychology
> wrote book:
- possible to be positivist without accepting all of Comte’s claims
- 4 arguments why introspection could be respectable scientific method (based on Mill/Spencer):
1. mind can attend more than one impression at the same time - -> why would it be unable to attend to its own conscious mental states?
2. introspection is base don memories
3. if one is rejecting introspection, how can one study mental functions?
4. introspection is not incompatible with objective method - -> to be scientific method it must be combined with empirical observation and verification
Jean-Martin Charcot
- 1825-1893
- towering figure in France
- trusted entirely on his clinical expertise
- -> turned out to be wrong in case of hypnosis
- one of the first neurologists
- interested in understanding hysteria
- -> found out: symptoms of hysteria resembled behaviour that could be elicited from individuals under hypnosis
- -> also saw resemblance between hysteria/epilepsy/hypnosis (similar mental/physical stages)
Frant Anton Mesmer
- 1734-1815
- was convinced that movements of planets/moon/sun influenced human body
- -> by means of ANIMAL MAGNETISM
- thought this could be used as cure for illnesses
- -> by magnetising patients
- 1784: commission concluded that animal magnetism would not exist