studies Flashcards
Conrad and Hull (1964),
phonological similarity effect
extended the lists where combination of things that sound very similar they are harder to remember
Peterson and Peterson (1959),
how long can info stay in STM w/o being rehearsed
**without rehearsal things leave STM very quickly
Turvey (1973),
what interferes with sensory memory?
brightness masking:
pattern maskig
brightness mask increases with brightness works only if shown in the same eye as array
Sperling (1960),
briefly presented arrays of letters
found that people could remember 4-5, he wanted to know why? was it because of short duration or short span?
Haig et al. (1983),
maze learning
stay depletion: know youve gone but eaten all the food there is none
go somewhere eat all the food u wont go bacl
, Lawrence and DeRivera (1954),
Relationships between the items the absolute or relative
show that animals learned rational responding relationship between them
Jenkins and Harrison (1960)
there are 3 reinforced stimuli done together
showed that when we see generalization under reinforced stimulus , things can change the curve
how easy it is to spot the stimulus
Kalish (1958),
differences that are easier to detect show differences in their generalization curves
580 easier to discriminate
Guttman and Kalish (1956),
stimulus they got rewarded for peaked at similar ones do
generalization gradient” curve demonstrating responses to the trained stimulus and surrounding stimulus
Kamin (1968) and Kamin (1969),
when you have multiple things going on and have the same presented to you, you wont relearn it unless something stronger is presented
Wilcoxon, Dragoin, and Kral (1971)
associative bias
chose different animals = rats and quals
rats are good at smelling, they are nocturnal do not use eyes
quals are out during day
classically conditioned to sour water that caused nausea or blue water.
** found that the rats to learn about sour water and quals about the blue water because of their evolutionary strategies of how they find food
there was a strong associative bias, based on natural habits in these animals.
CS tells us something about evolutionary history
Garcia and Koelling (1966),
taste aversion: done in rats get water paired with something bad
rats associate audiovisual stimulus w shock and taste stimulus with naseau
Rescorla (1968b),
probability of shock and tone is the same as getting as tone-tone, shock-shock.
supports the contingency
Gynther (1957),
conditioned blinking to dim light in either left or right eye
phase 1: light in right eye Air-puff, 2 pre conditioned groups
- blink just as much blinking in the left eye, but the light predicts airpuff
2 preconditioned groups:Light in the right and left eye cause you to blink a-lot.
** this shows generalization because you know that lights in my eyes mean airpuff just in case.
** eventually they realize that the light in the right eye means a puff, shows discrimination. blink less to the left eye
seeing both generalization and discrimination
Discrimination can emerge from learning, not always bc “red is dif than blue”
Fay (1994),
goldfish were conditioned w different “pitches”, they show a generalization gradient, they were conditioned to react to a specific pulse to they’d react the same to similar tones that are close to what they were trained to.