Encoding Flashcards
what is encoding?
the process throught which info is moves from STM to LTM
STM—-LTM
questions
How does knowledge affect encoding?
What strategies improve encoding?
What other kinds of factors help encoding?
knowledge and encoding
encoding is affected by meaning of the material we are trying
meaning and knowledge are very important for encoding:
1) elaborate vs maintenance rehearsal
2) depth of processing effects
3) organization
Types of Rehearsal
rote/ maintenance rehearsal: repeatedly rehearsing an item on the same level
ex: reacting a phone number to yourself before you write it down
elaborative: adding info to seems as your rehearse them
making up a story about words you see in list
is maintenance rehearsal enough (repeat things so many times) enough for knowledge to enter LTM?
prediction 1: if maintenance rehearsal is enough then repeated items should improve LTM
prediction 2: if maintenance rehearsal is not enough,
then repeating items will have no effect on long-term
memory
STUDY: Glenberg, smith, and green 1977
asked participate to remember numbers at delay while repeating a list of words.
results: not a difference between repeating a word 3 times or repeating a word 27 times. No variation repeating a triplet of words 3 times or 9x, not finding an advantage for maintenance rehearsal
no advantage for repeating items multiple times. maintenance rehearsal by itself is not enough to encode items.
Elaborative rehearsal is necessary to move info into LTM
Menti question: Jason is preparing for a vocabulary quiz in his French language class. Which strategy would be the least effective for him to memorize the definitions he needs to know?
A. Rereading all the pairs of words many times.
B. Quizzing himself by translating the terms between
English and French.
C. Creating elaborate images to link the French words
with the English words.
D. Writing stories using the French words.
Rereading all paird of words
Depth of Processing
idea that there are different encoding strategies that allow us for different levels of processing.
ex: Craick and Tulving 1975
what is depth? is depth always necessary?
STUDY: Hyde and Jenkins 1973
overall experimental works supports the idea that deeper encoding improves memory
manipulated both types of tasks and whether encoding was intentional or accidental
sentence fram task: does the word fit in the sentence
EG checking: does the work contain an E or G
Part of Speech
Frequency of usage of works
Pleasantness Rating
result: tasks that ask you to engage with meaning of the words causes deeper encoding than those that do not.
incidental vs accidental: we see a levels of processing affect
Transfer Appropriate Processing
Morris, Branford, and Franks 1977 (STUDY)
In some situations, depth of processing alone cannot
explain better performance
encoding
semantic task
ryhme task
results: interactions, when we are being tested with standard recognition task with semantic, but when we are tested with writing task and we encoding with writing then we do better.
The task was appropriate for the task we were going to do.
Summary
deeper processing results in better encoding
depth involves connection items to other process of meaningful information
depending on the task depth of processing may not provide the greatest advantage.
encoding: accessing meaning in some way
Menti question: Your friend explains that she links chemical reactions to scenes from plays she as been in as a way to remember them. Do you think this encoding strategy would work well for her?
A. No, encoding tasks must match the type of test
that is used
B. No, encoding tasks must be tested to show that
they work
C. Yes, most elaborative encoding tasks create an
advantage for memory
D. Yes, but only if she uses Shakespeare
Yes, most elaborative encoding tasks create an
advantage for memory
Organization
improves encoding by introducing additional structure
can occur in multiple levels
how is stimulus presented
how learning encourages strategies
from expertise of learner
Stimulus Presentations: Bradbent, Cooper, Braodmrny 1978
presented words with or without visual organization
visual organization was helping them learn the material
Strategy: Tulving and Pearlston 1966 (STUDY)
Tulving and Pearlston 1966
presented lists that vary in number of related words per category
2, 4, 3 related words in a category
- cow and rat
- engineering lawyer
Strategy: Tulving and Pearlston 1966 (STUDY)
Tulving and Pearlston 1966
presented lists that vary in number of related words per category
2, 4, 3 related words in a category
- cow and rat
- engineering lawyer
more words per category improves uncued recall, and words we recalled
results: when we get to 4 words pet category performance is better than average, extra info from that category helps you remember the information