Forgetting Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

forgetting

A

uses a wider set of process than just failing to retrieve
incidental forgetting: Things we forget by accident
motivated forgetting: things we forgot for a reason, either consciously or unconsciously

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Studying forgetting

A

forgetting increases overtime
the amount of information
forgotten can be characterized using a forgetting curve
we never really forget everything

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

ecological validity

A

using a realstic experimental situation, allowing conclusions to be generalizrd
but sometimes we cannot control

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Meeter et al

A

forgetting curves cam also be seen for more naturalistic things
a month after we forget things
results: forgetting curves is not an artifact of being in an eperiemt, it is also in real llife about the things we care about remembering.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Bahrick 1984
initial vs long knowledge

A

long term knowledge may be preserved for years
forgetting curves; First years we lose information quickly, after 3 years we lose information pretty slow whether its been 10 years or 50 years

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

forgetting curve

A

shape of function that tracks process of knowledge and shows forgetting over time.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Andy took organic chemistry ten years ago. Assuming
his forgetting follows a standard curve, how much does
he probably remember now?
A. The same amount as right after he took the final
B. He has probably forgotten everything
C. He likely has some long-term knowledge that has
not been forgotten
D. All of what he learned in the class

A

C. He likely has some long-term knowledge that has
not been forgotten

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

factors that improve memory: Consolidation Laws

A

Jost’s Law: If two associations are of equal strength
but of different age, the older one diminishes less with
time
- going to forget some information over time
Ribot’s Law: retrograde amnesia affects newer
memories more than older memories
- time component to what memories are more stable
older memories are forgotten less and more resistant to things to brain damage.
Why is this? Consolidation!
-

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Consolidation

A

The process of making a new memory a more
permanent part of the brain
changing clothes for winter, clothes are actively being used slowly moving clothes to another spot little by little
Systemic: mapping traces to areas of cortex
Process may take years

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Testing effect

A

more testing results in better learning

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Carpenter, Pashler, Wixted, and Vul (2008)
testing effect

A

had people learn 60 cool facts and tracked their learning over months
some facts were tested and others were studies
results:study test: remains higher over time
restudy:
people are forgetting less over time in the restudy condition
than those that did not

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Spacing

A

more space between studies decreases forgotten

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Memory type

A

implicit and explicit memoru may be at different rates.
Tulving, Schacter, and Stark (1982)
Showed participants a list of 96 words
Explicit: asked if they recognized the word
Implicit: filled in word fragments, demonstrate the knowledge by doing the skull. Cannot really explain it

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Tulving, Schacter, and Stark (1982): Explicit and implicit memory tasks

A

Showed participants a list of 96 words
Explicit: asked if they recognized the word
Implicit: filled in word fragments, demonstrate the knowledge by doing the skull. Cannot really explain it

resutls; Tested people 1 hr and 7 days, for recognition they are good after an hour but not after 7 days
for fragments they are good for both
priming remains the same up to a week.
explicit memory has underone forgetting under a week, but implict has not

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Dumitra has been studying Sanskrit for several years,
but she has had to learn a lot of new words in the
literature class she is taking right now. The reason she
forgets newer words but not older ones is likely due to:
A. Consolidation
B. Implicit memory
C. The forgetting curve
D. Mnemonics

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

what factors hurt memory? Interference and decay

A

Interference: too many multiple related memories cam distrust each other
decay: the longer we hold on to something the weaker it becomes

17
Q

Evidence for
Interference and
Decay

A

Neuroscience evidence for weakening traces does
exist, but behavioral evidence is less convincing
hard to control for new experiences
how do we prevent reharsal

18
Q

What is
Interference
Doing?

A

When we have many similar items to search through,
we often cannot find what we’re looking to
competition assumption: a cue activates all of the associates including competitors

19
Q

Proactive and
Retroactive
Interference

A

Proactive interference: old information interferes with
new information
-old affects new
Retroactive interference: new information interferes
with old information
new effects old

20
Q

Kayla studied jazz dance last year, and now she is
starting to study tap dance. She keeps confusing the
names of jazz techniques with the new techniques she
is learning. This is an example of:
A. Retroactive interference
B. Proactive interference
C. Inactive interference
D. Active interference

A

B. Proactive interference

21
Q

Barnes and Underwood (1959)
retroactive

A

Learned a list of paired associates
DOG-ROCK
Then, learned a second list of paired associates,
reusing cue
DOG-SKY
results: retroactive interference, nre list intetfering with old list

22
Q

Proactive
Interference
Underwood (1957)

A

result: old informstion. interefering with nre infirmstion

23
Q

Interference Phenemonoma: Part set cuing***

A

Presenting a category of items prevents you from
recalling a specific member of that group

24
Q

Slamecka (1968) part set cuing

A

Studied lists of words from a single category (“birds”)
Receiving some cues (e.g. robin) made it harder to
recall non-cues
explanation 1: presenting cues creates more interference leading to hard time retrieving
explanation 2: retrieving the cues creates interfefence.

25
Q

Bauml and Aslan (2004)

A

cuing and retrieving conditions are bad
but restudy is better, memory is better when less interference occurs

26
Q

Part set cuing impairment**

A
27
Q

You are learning two lists in a memory experiment. In
one, you learn categories that are not semantically
related (dog-roof). In the other, you learn paired
associates that are semantically related (dog-bone).
Then, you complete a part-set cuing paradigm with
both. You would expect more forgetting in:
A. The unrelated list
B. The related list
C. Equal in both lists
D. No forgetting in either list

A

B. The related list

28
Q

Retrieval Induced
Forgetting

A

only told to recall some of the items
we get items from semantically similiar categories
retrieval practice like : fruit-o-
then you get tested
results: we are better at the ones we practices than the ones we did not
but the category we did not study at all will be impacted by the things we did study.
RP- items ( category from the items we did practice but the items we did not)

29
Q

You complete a retrieval-induced forgetting with three
categories – fruit, tools, and office supplies. You
receive retrieval practice only for items from the fruit
category. What results would you expect?
A. Retrieval-induced forgetting for fruit, but not for the
other categories**
B. Retrieval-induced forgetting for all categories
C. Retrieval-induced forgetting for fruit and office
supplies, but not tools
D. No retrieval-induced forgetting

A

Retrieval-induced forgetting for fruit, but not for the
other categories

30
Q

Mechanism of Forgetting: associative blocking

A

associative blocking: retrieval creates stronger cues,
which outcompete weaker unpracticed cues

31
Q

Mechanism of Forgetting: unlearning

A

unlearning; accidentally retrieving a trace results in its
associative strength being diminished, preventing
further retrieval

32
Q

Mechanism of Forgetting: unlearning

A

inhibition: we can diminish abilities to activate of
memories if they cause too much interference
interference dependance:
competitor that do not cause significant interference fo not show retrieval induces forgetting