Student responses to schooling - subcultures Flashcards
Pupil subcultures are
groups of students who share some values, norms and behaviour, which give them a sense of group identity and belonging, and provide them with support and peer-group status during the schooling process
Lacey (1970) - Differentiation and polarization
study of a middle-class grammar school found 2 related processes at work in schools
- Differentiation - ranking and categorising students into groups (streams or sets) according to criteria such as hard work, good behaviour and exam success
- Polarisation - a consequence of differentiation where students are divided into 2 opposing groups (‘poles’) - high achieving conformists in top streams and those in bottom streams who are labelled as failures and therefore derpived of status
Abraham (1989) study of a comprehensive school using setting found
that teacher’ perceptions of students’ academic ability and the processes of differentiation and polarisation led to the formation of pro-school and anti-school subcultures which can shape pupils’ identities and affect their chances of academic success
(Hargreaves, 1967, and Ball, 1981, also found this in secondary modern and streamed comprehensive schools, respectively)
Pro-school subculture definition
a group organised around a set of values, attitudes and behaviour which generally conforms to the academic aims, ethos and rules of a school
‘The lads’ in Willis’ Learning to Labour study called members of pro-school subcultures
‘ear ‘oles’
Mac an Ghaill (1994) found a conformist pro-school subculture emerged in two male groups
- ‘Academic Achievers’ - skilled manual working class white and asian students who aspired to middle-class careers through academic success
- ‘New Enterprisers’ - skilled manual working class white and asian students who aspired to middle-class careers through success in vocational subjects (like computers or technology)
Sewell (1998) found a pro-school subculture among
some black pupils (‘the conformists’) who sought to achieve academic success and avoid racist stereotyping and labelling by teachers by conforming to school values
Belonging to a pro-school subculture is likely to encourage
peer-group support for success in education.
Students in pro-school subcultures are likely to be
students in upper streams and sets who are valued and rewarded and given status as they fulfil the school’s ambition for good behaviour and academic success, generally from middle-class or skilled working class backgrounds
Anti-school subculture definition
(sometimes called a counter-school subculture) consists of pupils who rebel against the school for various reasons, and develop an alternative anti-school identity, made up of a set of delinquent values, attitudes and behaviour (eg truancy, breaking rules, messing around) in opposition to the aims, ethos and rules of the school
Subculture of resistance definition
one that not only has some differences from the dominant culture but also in active opposition to it
Participation in anti-school subcultures
provides a means for pupils to improve their own self esteem, by giving them status in the eyes of their peer group which has been denied them by the school, but it also contributes to further poor educational performance, and in many cases contributes to the self-fulfilling prophecy of underachievement
Pupils in anti-school subcultures are likely to be
black caribbean and white british working class males
A typical example of an anti-school subculture is
‘the lads’ in Willis’ Learning to Labour study in Wolverhampton comprehensive schools who sought to free themselves from what they saw as boring and oppressive schooling by making ‘having a laff’ their main aim
Mac an Ghaill identified an anti-school subculture
in the bottom streams and sets (‘the Macho lads’, who were predominantly black caribbean working class boys) who were hostile to schooling and sought to achieve status and identity through aggressive masculinity and peer-group support, rebelling against racist stereotyping and labelling by teachers