Privatisation, marketisation and private education Flashcards
Privatisation definition
where services which were once provided by the state are transferred to the ownership of private companies
Marketisation definition
the process whereby services, like education or health, that were previously controlled and run by the state, have government or local council control and support reduced or removed altogether, and operate like independently managed private businesses, subject to the free market forces of supply and demand, based on competition and consumer choice
Neoliberalism definition
an economic approach that suggests resources are more efficiently managed by private businesses, and advocates shifting public services like education and health from the public sector to the private sector - privatising them. This is accompanied by marketisation.
Many of the educational policies since the 1980s (eg privatisation and marketisation) have their roots in
neoliberalism, an approach that believes the state should play a minimal role in providing and managing these services, and that the free market (free enterprise and free trade between businesses) should decide how these services operate
Neoliberalism suggests that
the best way to deliver and improve public services is by making them operate as (or like) private businesses)
Neoliberalism is a feature of the
New Right approach to education
the UK government spent around
£116 billion (inc student loan payments) on education in 2023, so there’s an enormous potential market for private investment
Ball and Youdell (2007) - 2 kinds of privatisation in education
- privatisation in education (endogenous)
- privatisation of education (exogenous)
Ball and Youdell - privatisation in education - ‘endogenous’ privatisation
- privatisation within the education system, where schools, colleges and universities begin to operate more like private businesses
- involves importing ideas from the private sector, for example local management (schools running themselves mostly independently), competition between schools for students, efficiency, performance related pay for teachers, consumer (parental) choice between schools, target-setting, school league tables, inspections and per capita (per student) funding
- these policies were first established by Conservative governments 1979-1997, continued by Labour governments 1997-2010 and sped up by the Conservative-Lib. dem coalition 2010-2015 with the expansion of the academy system
Ball and Youdell (2007) - privatisation of education - ‘exogenous’ privatisation
- privatisation from outside the education system - allowing private businesses to sell products to the state education system
- Ball and Youdell (2007) suggest both UK and international companies are taking over things like:
school services (staff training, consultancy, providing supply teachers, ICT services, school transport, meals, cleaning, pay rolls etc)
management of schools (privately managed chains of academy schools)
school inspections (like Tribal Inspections - OFSTED’s largest contractor in 2014, but it 2014 OFSTED stopped using private contractors)
designing, building and operating school buildings under the Private Finance Initiative (PFI), where private businesses can finance construction and manage school buildings for about 30 years (owning them and renting them to the school)
branding of schools (website construction, logo development, school prospectus design etc)
forming education policy through advice, consultation and research
running the examination system (Pearson Edexcel, the largest examination’s awarding body is run by the multinational company Pearson PLC)
Evaluation of privatisation - in favour
- more business-like and efficient schools, with higher standards
- more choice for parents
- profit-motive may encourage companies to provide schools and improve ‘failing’ schools in order to attract more pupils
Evaluation for privatisation - against
- money may be drained from the education system as providers may not reinvest profits back into education
- cherry-picking, where companies only invest in the best schools or ones that can be easily improved to maximise profit
- private companies can go out of business, leaving children without schools
- equality of educational opportunity could be under threat, as the desire for profit may override providing for pupils’ needs and could lead to more covert or overt selection of students so schools look better
pressure to maintain performance and image of the school could lead to what Gillborn and Youdell (2000) call
educational triage, reinforcing inequalities
Marketisation as a means of improving education was originally an idea of
new right theorists like Chubb and Moe, and was first developed in the UK under Conservative governments 1979-1997
Main features of marketisation
- independence (allowing schools to control their own affairs and run like private businesses)
- competition (making schools compete for students)
- choice (giving parents a choice of schools, enabling them to choose the education which best suits them)
Features of marketisation (independence, competition and choice) are backed up by
quality control (through inspections by OFSTED), a national curriculum, government-approved subjects (like the EBacc), testing, the publication of Performance Tables