steretypes and behaviour Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

word et al 1974

A
  • how do stereotypes impact on persons chance of getting a job
  • how it impacts the targets behaviour
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

what was word et al study 1974

A
  • if white interviewrs adopt different interactional styles with black/white candidates
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

how was word et al 1974 1st study carried out and what was manipulated and the measure?

A
  • manipulated: black and white candidates
  • measure: non-verbal behaviour og interviewers
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

how was word et al 1974 2nd study carried out and what was manipulated and the measure?

A
  • all white
  • manipulated: non-verbal behaviour of interviewers
  • measured: performance of applicant (all white)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

what was found from word et al 1974 study (job interview)

A
  • non-verbal style associated with black people made applicants perform poorer
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

what did word et al find out about the effect of having stereotypes?

A
  • holding the stereotype may unconsciously act in ways that lead to them acting the stereotype.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Rosenhan 1973 study

A
  • the power of psychiatric labels
  • if psychaiatrists could distinguish between the sane and insane
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

strategy of Rosenhann 1973 study (3 steps)

A
  • 8 sane people admitted to 12 different mental hospitals
  • capped hospitals saying they heard voices saying “empty” “hollow” “thud” (existential symptoms absent from psychiatric books)
  • when submitted acted normally and engged in conversations with others
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

what was the aim of the rosenhann 1973 study

A
  • to see how fast they could be released
  • to note their observations of treatment
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

what were the time frames people stayed in the mental hospital for- rosenhann

A
  • shortest 7 days
  • longest 52 days
  • mean 19 days
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

how many pills were given when in mental hospital

A
  • 2,100 tablets (were not consumed)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

what did rosenhann conclude from labels in the mental hospital?

A
  • labels stick
  • hard to get rid off/ takes a long time even when sane
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

what things did the hospital regard as symptoms of mental health issues

A
  • noting observations
  • standing in lunch queue 45 minutes before it started
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

how much time was recorded that psychiatrists spent with the ‘schizo’ patients?

A
  • less than 7 hours a day (6.8)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

what was observed about the staff in mental hospital? and what effect did it have

A
  • avoided contacts with patients
  • fake patients experinced feelings of distress and depersonalisation, were spoken about negatively in their presence
  • witnessed effects of cruelty and verbal abuse
  • concluded when your labelled your not taken seriously
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

what did rosenhann conclude about these mental institutions in effectiveness?

A
  • not therapeutic
  • contributed to psychological distress
  • to not have a system where people are labelled
17
Q
A
18
Q

what did rosenhann conclude about them being able to distinguish sane from insane

A
  • they could not distinguish it
  • self labelling
  • counter therapeutic
19
Q

what kind of experiment was rosenhann 1973 and why was it effective

A
  • a field experiment (nurses and staff etc unaware of experiment)
  • high ecological validity
  • adds to internal validity
  • results showed little differences between the hospitals
20
Q

levine et al 1995, what was being studied?

A
  • how we categorise ourself and others
  • ( Manchester United vs Liverpool)
21
Q

what was found from Levine et al 1995 study

A
  • when MU fan saw another MU top fall went over to help
  • when MU fan saw Liverpool or red non-football top did not go and help
22
Q

what did levine et al 1995 conclude from MU only helping another MU

A
  • we have empathy/ sense of psycholigical connection when someone is part of your group, even when the only cue was the shirt worn