Stats Lecture 9 Repeated measures anova Flashcards
Disadvantages
Carryover effects?
•Practice, fatigue, order, etc
•Counterbalancing may be possible solution
Advantages
(Possibly) greater internal validity
What is the difference score formula as a related (paired) samples t-test?
D (difference/change score) is X1-X2.
What is the difference score formula as a contrast?
= (1)X2 + (-1)X1 = CONTRAST [-1 1] across repeats
Ho and Ha?
Mean of the difference scores is zero, contrast coefficient = 0 Alternative is mean doesn’t equal zero.
How to conclude F = sentence from repeated measures anova
F(1,4) = 6.3252 = 40.00, p = .003
Look at the line on spss that is not the error, ignore that
What is SS condition?
Averaged over subjects, we can obtain an estimate of systematic differences on the DV between conditions (substances):
𝐒𝐒𝐂𝐨ndition =𝑛 SUM OF (J=1) (Ybar𝑗−Ybar) sqaured
= 5 x [(-5)squared + (-1)sqaured + (6)sqaured]
=310
What is SS subject?
Averaged over conditions, we can obtain an estimate of overall differences on the DV between subjects to remove from analysis:
𝐒𝐒(Subject) =SUM OF Ji=1 (Sbar 𝑖−Ybar)sqaured
= 3 x [(-5)2 + (-3)2 + (-2)2 + (3)2 + (7)2]
= 288
What is SS error?
The effect of condition (treatment) can also fluctuate between subjects (subject x treatment interaction) because of individual differences or error. This error variance can also be estimated:
𝐒𝐒Error 𝐄=SUM OF n SUM OF j (Y𝑖𝑖 −Ybar𝑗−S
bar 𝑖+Ybar) sqaured
= [(3-7-7+12)2 + … + (0)2 ]
= 88
In SPSS what does the table with the Type III Sums of Squares mean?
top line = SS(Condition): Systematic variability on the DV between conditions
bottom line = SS(Error): Non-systematic variability on the DV after removing systematic differences between conditions and subjects
Different table labelled error = SS(Subjects): Systematic variability on the DV between subjects
Between vs. Within-subject designs bottom line
Repeated measures designs can be more powerful, all other things being equal, because there is less error variance (i.e., variability in the DV that we cannot account for).
•Using a repeated measures ANOVA, SS(Subjects) is estimated and then partitioned away in the ‘Test of Between Subjects Effects’ where it is removed from the analysis.
•However, if mistakenly analysed as a between-subjects design, (three conditions, three diffreent groups of participants) SS(Subjects) becomes part of the error term.
df condition
J-1
df subjects
n-1
Suppose experiment incorrectly analysed using Between-Subjects ANOVA (condition = group) what would happen?
Larger SSW => SS(Error) => Larger MSE => Smaller F =>Less power
If we correctly used a repeated measures anova, the variability is partitioned away, locled away because we have accounted for SS Subjects.
Suppose the researcher planned the following contrasts ahead of time what happens?
the sum of the SS contrasts in either interger or standard form, is SS Condition. This is because they are a full set of mutually orthogonal contrasts
why would a wrong between subbjects design give les spower?
pooled error term includes the between subjects error, in within subjects designs they aren’t compared against each other, just between groups
difference score vs contrast score
they mean the same thing
what is Ybar contrast?
mean = psy hat = Ybar contrast
Why does F value stay the same whether normalised or not?
ratio is the same. all in same scale
if you want to compare variability across contrasts or for the anova effect:
all have to be in the same scale (we are setting the normalised scale)
Why separate error term for each of the contrasts?
Each of the represents variability in how people’s driving skills (DV) changes on that dimension (contrast) of interest
•
These separate error terms are sensitive to differences in variability in how people’s scores change
Multivariate approach in spss. Each repeat has it’s own error. Subtract each person’s contrast score from the mean of the contrast scores.
larger MSE wil give what F?
smaller F
What uses the pooled error term?
univariate approach
what is pooled error term?
SSW or average error variance across all the levels of the IV. not sensitive to variablity in contrast scores so overestimates or underestimates variability in ind poeple’s contrasts (difference) scores.
UNderestimate = type 1 error risk
overestimate = type 2 error risk
ifi we wrongly use pooled error term (when we want seperate errors for repeats) what happens?
obs F is larger, because MSE has been underestimated for one contrast (type 1 error. rejecting ho)
Sphericity
Sphericity is assumed when using the univariate (pooled) error term: variability in contrast scores is the same across all possible pairwise comparisons between conditions
omnibus questions for within subjects designs
all about change. do changes (differences) differ between two conditions.
spss output test of within subject effects
anova table with three families but with seperate error terms.