ANOVA Lectures 5 and 6 Flashcards

1
Q

What is EER?

A

The probability of making a type 1 error over all of the inferences or contrasts (according to k) in the experiment. The probability is no longer 5%, it’s more likley k times alpha.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Methods of controlling the EER for contrasts: planned vs post hoc contrasts

A

For planned contrasts (formulated before looking at the data): •EER control is optional if the contrasts are orthogonal • Otherwise, researchers can use either Bonferroni or Scheffé to control the EER (typically the procedure with the smaller c.v.) Both Bon and sheffe are CONSERVATIVE. Either at alpha or a bit below alpha. For post hoc contrasts (formulated after looking at the data): • Researchers must control the EER • Only the Scheffé procedure can be used

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Why does Type I error inflate with k?

A

Number of pairwise comparisons (contrasts) = Jx(J-1) The more conditions you have in an experiment, the more likely we get extremes even though nothing systematic is happening.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

How does a researcher decide which contrasts to test before looking at the results?

A

Compare groups which can be meaningfully clustered (i.e., averaged) based on theory e.g. None vs. Any (pill, capsule, inject) Intravenous (inject) vs. Oral (pill, capsule) Pill vs. Capsule

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

How does a researcher decide which contrasts to test after looking at the results?

A

(e.g. Looks like pain is lower after capsule than any of the other conditions.) So compare groups with the biggest (sample) mean difference

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Why is k ≠ 1 when doing post hoc contrasts? Why not just use the biggest mean difference and test that contrast?

A

because at least (all those other) contrasts are also implicitly tested. Even if it’s unconscious, you’ve looked at means. Probability of type 1 error is inflated with more contrasts, number of k increases quickly with number of groups. k of 10 = type 1 error rate of 50%. We don’t know what K is, so we can’t use BOnf which depends on K. K is in the formula.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Why can’t you use bonf for post hoc?

A

We don’t know K, we have to use Sheffe.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

If null hyp for anova if true what happens to contrasts using Sheffe?

A

If you use Sheffe, they will also not be significant.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What links sheffe to ANOVA?

A

The researcher decided to reject Ho if MSB/MSW is greater than crit F with v1 and v2 df. MSB = SSB/v1 so… this is the formula for the sheffe critical f.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What can SS contrast be? (range)

A

Remember, for any contrast, SS contrast is a number between zero and SSB

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Why will that SS contrast = SSB for at least one contrast?

What is this contrast called?

A

Since SS contrast is between 0 and SSB,

If we reject Ho from the omnibus anova, we are saying that SSB/MSW is a number that is greater than v1 x critical F.05, v1, v2.

This means we must be able to define at least one significant contrast, such that SS contrast = SSB.

This is the maximal contrast. (can only be defined post hoc.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

When is the maximal contrast defined?

A

It can only be defined post hoc because it’s based on the sum of squared deviations between each of the sample group means (Ybarj) and the sample grand mean (Ybar g).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Whta happens if you have a contrast with coefficients like 7 5 -3 -9?

A

They are not interpretable because they dno’t have two groups avergaed together (mean diff cont), nor do they correspond to a trend.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

If we have looked at the means, we know the anova is significant, we want to test the contrasts, what are we using?

A

It’s post hoc so only use sheffe.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What is the sheffe critical F table?

A

Anova F tables (normal)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

what does comfortably significant mean?

A

Obs F is at least twice the size of the crit F.

We should be able to find some sig, interpretable post hoc contrasts using the coefficients from the maximal contrast as a guide

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

What is a complex contrast?

A

-1 -1 -1 3

It compars several groups. The average of two or more group means on one hand and the avergae of one or more means on the other hand.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

how do you work out how much proportio of SSB is accounted for in a contrast?

A

You divide the SScontrast by the maximal SS contrast (the SSB) to get a ratio.

e.g. Psy max SS contrast = 1640. (ss contrast 1 is 1280)

contrast 1 (psy1) accounts for 1280/1640 = 0.78 or 78% of SSB

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

What happens if Contrasts are not orthogonal?

A

These SS contrasts will account for overlapping bits. If you add up the SSs they greatly exceed the SSB that is supposed to be available.

If they were orth, they would sum to SSB.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

simple contrast is

A

pairwise comparison

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

If you have psy 1 of 1 0 0 -1, that is not sig, can other contrasts in the experiment be sig?

A

Even thought maximal contrast is significant, No. contrast 1 was the largest possible pairwise comparison (simple contrast)
• Contrast 1 is not significant, so no other pairwise comparison between conditions will be significant using Scheffé

So now we should be looking at other kinds of complex contrasts.

22
Q

Will SS contrast and obs F for complex contrasts be higher than simple or lower than simple ones?

A

Higher, because they’ve got more groups, and thus more power.

Think back to the formular for SS Contrast. The denominator is divided by the sum of sqaured coefficients. In standard form that will be 2. (1 0 0 -1).

For complex contrasts in standard form, the coefficients will always be a smaller number (1/3 1/3 1/3 -1) That sum of sqaured will be 1.33. Do we are dividing the SS contrast by a smaller number. So larger F value!!

23
Q

how do you create a complex contrast that is interpretable?

A

compare the groups with positive coefficients with the groups with negative coefficients?

How do you assign a grouping label to those with standard treatment and no treatment? Not interpreatble.

First you have 7 5 -3 -9.

The other method. make it (1 1 0 -2): still following the pos and neg contrasts. Drop the coefficients that are closest to zero (-3) and make it zero.

24
Q

Why would it be good to plan contrasts ahead of time

A

Because then you won’t be forced to use the highly conservative sheffe procedure. So conservative that other things won’t reach significance. Crit value will be higher than normal.

But you can have unlimited questions with bonf.

25
Q
A
26
Q

If you have a planned contrast, no concern for controlling EER, and it is a set of mutually orthogonal, what do you use?

A

DER

27
Q
A
28
Q

If you have concern for contorlling EER, and k is smaller than or equal to J-1, what do you use?

What if K is bigger than J-1?

A

If k is smaller than or equal to J-1, use bonferroni.

If greater than J-1, CHECK. Does sheffe or bonferroni give you a smaller F crit?

If planned always use sheffe.

29
Q
A
30
Q

The contrast coefficients -1 -1 2 and -0.5 -0.5 1 represent the same contrast. How will ach set of contrast coefficients change?

A

Given that for any collection of group means, the group means will be the same, the contrast estimate therefore depends on the values of the contrast coefficients. In this example, for (-1 -1 2) will be twice as large as for (-0.5 -0.5 1).

31
Q

When can you interpret a contrast coefficient as a mean difference?

A

When they are in standard form - you can see in output L1, and L2 below it. The contrast estimate for L2 is the mean difference from the first contrast estimate if they are directly interpretable.

32
Q

how do you find F from a contrast output?

A

The value of F is obtained by dividing the contrast estimate by the standard error, and then squaring this result.

33
Q

two way anova questions for 2x3 (3)

A

1.

Averaged over levels of IVB, does mean DV differ as a function of IVA?
2.
Averaged over levels of IVA, does mean DV differ as a function of IVB?
3. interaction
Does the difference in mean DV between levels of IVA differ as a function of IVB?

34
Q

in two way anova what is ßk?

A

Main effect of B.

35
Q

what is an aßjk

A

interaction effect (AxB) in two way anova

36
Q

how do the effect parrameters affect the DV?

A

We don’t know what the population parameters are in real life, we estimate them.

We would use the GLM

Yijk = µ + aj + ßk + aßjk + epsilon ijk

37
Q

what happens if we have no interaction?

A

the lines are parallel, the ‘gaps’ are the same size, and effects are additive

The interaction is independent of a and b. It doesn’t change the colum and row means

38
Q

When there is an interaction

A

the lines are not parallel, the ‘gaps’ are different sizes, and the effects are ‘multiplicative’

39
Q

If there are interaction effects, we have to be careful when drawing conclusions about

A

e.g. the effects of therapy on relaxing thoughts… it depends on the type of backup received; or the effects of backup on relaxing thoughts… it depends on the type of therapy received

40
Q

Why do scores differ (from the grand mean)?

A

According to the Main Effect of A (a hat): Because the row means differ from the grand mean (Ybarj-Ybar)

According to the Main Effect of B (ßhat): Because the column means differ from the grand mean (Ybar k - Ybar)

According to the interaction effect (aßjk):

Because the cell means differ from the grand mean after removing the effects of A and B(Ybarjk−Ybar−αhat j−β
hat k)

According to the Error: Because people differ from the mean of their cell (Yijk−Ybarjk)

41
Q

Who are the 4 parameters are estimated for? How do we make them not dd to zero?

A

Each person in the experiment. The sunm of these will be zero, so to obtain an average/pooled deviations from the grand mean, we square them.

42
Q

what is F for two way anova?

A

Are the effects of these three famlilies signifianctly different from zero?

43
Q

What is FER?

A

family wise error rate. Purely between subjects design. a = .o5, but you have diff dfs.

df effect (seperate for families) and df error (same across families)

44
Q

interaction conc interpretation

A

the solid line always higher than dotted line, so differences in the DV are different across different levels of the IV. The gaps are different. Greatness/increase varies according to different levels of the IV other IV.

45
Q

What are line graohs better for with two way anova?

A

quantitative IVs.

46
Q

What is the null hyp for the Main Effect of A?

A

Do the difference or gap in DV between IV1 and IV2, does this gap differ as a function of IVA.

Null hyp: for the main effect of A, all the alpha js = 0. None of the j row means deviate from the grand mean. All the row means = grand mean.

47
Q

Null hyp for main effect of B?

A

Is the size of the gaps for B1, B2 and B3… different as a function of IVA?

All of the ßks = 0, or µk-µ = 0.

48
Q
A
49
Q
A
50
Q
A