Sociology-theories and methods-globalisation, modernity, postmodernity Flashcards

1
Q

What are modernist theories?

A

They are part of the Enlightenment project-the idea that society can process through the use of human reason. Rationality and science will enable us to discover true knowledge about the world. With this knowledge we can progress to a future freedom and prosperity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What is the aim of modernist theories?

A

They set out to explain the working of modern society and to identify the direction it should take if it is to progress

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What is modern society?

A

It first emerged in Wester Europe from about the late 18th century. It has a number of characteristics that distinguish it from previous traditional societies

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What are characteristics of modern society (that distinguish it from previous traditional societies)?

A

The nation-state, capitalism, rationality/science/technology, individualism

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What is the nation-state in modern society?

A

It is the key political unit in modern society-bounded territory ruled by a powerful centralised state, whose population usually shares the same language and culture. Tend to think of modern world as made up of series of separate societies, each with own state. The state is the focal point of modern society, organising social life on national basis. Modern states have created large administrative bureaucracies and educational, welfare and legal institutions to regulate their citizens’ lives. Nation-state is also important source of identity for citizens, who identify with its symbols, such as the flag

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What is capitalism in modern society?

A

The economy of modern societies is capitalist-based on private ownership of means of production and use of wage labourers. Capitalism brought about industrialisation of modern society, with huge increases in wealth. However wealth distribution is unequal, resulting in class conflict. Nation-sate becomes important in regulating capitalism/maintaining conditions under which is operates. Lash and Urry describe this as ‘organised capitalism’. In modern industry, production is organised in Fordist principles: the mass production of standardised product is large factories, using low skilled labour. Cheap, mass produced consumer goods lead to rising standard of living

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What is rationality, science and technology in modern society?

A

Rational, secular, scientific ways of thinking dominate and the influence of magico-religious explanations of the world declines. Technically efficient forms of organisation, such as bureaucracies and factories, dominate social and economic life. Science becomes increasingly important in industry, medicine and communications

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What is individualism in modern society?

A

Tradition, custom and ascribed status become less important as the basis for our actions. We experience greater personal freedom and can increasingly choose our own course in life and define our own identity. However, structural inequalities such as class remain important in shaping people’s identity and restricting their choices

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What is globalisation?

A

Until recently, the nation-state provided the basic framework for most people’s lives. However, many sociologists argue we are now increasingly affected by globalisation-the increasing interconnectedness of people across national boundaries. We live in one interdependent ‘global village’ and our lives are shaped by a global framework. Four related changes have helped bring this about

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What four related changes helped bring about globalisation?

A

Technological changes, economic changes, political changes, and changes in culture and identity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

How have technological changes helped to bring about globalisation?

A

Can now cross entire continents in matter of hours and exchange info across globe with click of a mouse. Satellite communications, internet and global television networks have helped create time-space compression, closing distances between people

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Although technology has helped improve the world, how has it also had a negative effect?

A

Technology also brings risks on a global scale. Eg, greenhouse gases produced in one place contribute to global climate change that leads to a rise in sea levels and flooding in low-lying countries. Beck argues that we are now living in ‘risk society’, where increasingly the threats to our well being come from human-made technology rather than natural disasters

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

How have economic changes helped to bring about globalisation?

A

Economic activity now takes place within set of global networks that are creating ever-greater interconnectedness. The global economy is increasingly a ‘weightless’ or electronic economy. Instead of producing physical goods, much activity now involves the production of information such as music, TV programmes and data processing. These commodities are produced, distributed and consumed through global electronic networks

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

How has the economy been changed by globalisation?

A

In the electronic economy, money never sleeps. Global 24-hour financial transactions permit the instantaneous transfer of funds around the world in pursuit of profit. This too contributes to the ‘risk society’

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What is another major economic force pushing globalisation forward?

A

Trans-national companies (TNCs). These operate across frontiers, organising production on a global scale. Most TNCs are Western-based. Some, such as Coca-Cola, are colossal enterprises, and the largest 500 together account for half the total value of the commodities produced in the whole world. So powerful are the small elite who control these companies, that Sklair argues they now form a separate global capitalist class

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

How have political changes helped bring about globalisation?

A

Some sociologists claim that globalisation has undermined the power of the nation-state. Eg Ohmae argues we now live in a ‘borderless world’ in which TNCs and consumers have more economic power than national governments. States are now less able to regulate the activities of large capitalist enterprises, a situation Lash and Urry describe as ‘disorganised capitalsim’

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

How have changes in culture and identity helped being about globalisation?

A

Globalisation makes it much harder for cultures to exist in isolation from one another. A major reason for this is the role of information and communications technology (ICT), especially with the mass media

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

What sort of culture do we live in today?

A

Today we find ourselves living in a global culture in which Western-owned media companies spread Western culture to the rest of the world. Economic integration also encourages a global culture, eg TNCs such as Nike, selling the same consumer goods in many countries, help to promote similar tastes across national borders. In addition, the increased movement of people as tourists, economic migrants, refugees and asylum seekers helps to create globalised culture

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

What is the effect of globalisation on identity?

A

Globalisation undermines traditional sources of identity such as class, eg the shift of manufacturing from the West to developing countries has led to the fragmentation and decline of working-class communities that previously gave people their class identity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

What sort of questions do the changes that led to globalisation raise?

A

Do they mean we are no longer living in modernity-are we now in a new, postmodern society? Do we need new theories to understand society as we now find it, or can we use our existing modernist theories to explain it? Is the Enlightenment project still viable-can we still hope to achieve objective knowledge and use it to improve society? Or have rapid changes made society too chaotic for us to understand and control?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

What theories offer answers to the questions raised by the changes that led to globalisation?

A

Postmodernism, theories of later modernity and Marxist theories of postmodernity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

What is postmodernism?

A

It is a major intellectual movement that has emerged since the 1970s. It has been influential in many areas including sociology. Postmodernists argue we are now living in a new era of postmodernity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

What is postmodernity?

A

Postmodernity is an unstable, fragmented, media-saturated global village, where image and reality are indistinguishable. In postmodern society, we define ourselves by what we consume. It is not a continuation of modernity, but a fundamental break with it. For postmodernists, this new kind of society requires a new kind of theory-modernist theories no longer apply

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

What do postmodernists argue about knowledge?

A

Drawing on ideas of Foucault, postmodernists argue there are no sure foundations to knowledge-no objective criteria we can use to prove whether a theory is true or false. This view-known as anti-foundationalism-has two consequences

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Q

What are the two consequences of anti-foundationalism?

A

The Enlightenment project of achieving progress through true, scientific knowledge is dead-if we cannot guarantee our knowledge is correct, we cannot use it to improve society. Aldo any all-embracing theory that claims to have the truth about how to create a better society, such as Marxism, is just a meta narrative-just someone’s version of reality, not the truth, therefore there is no reason to accept the claims that the theory makes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
26
Q

Why do postmodernists reject meta-narratives?

A

On the grounds that they have helped to create oppressive totalitarian states that impose their version of the truth on people. Eg, in the former Soviet Union, the state’s attempt to re-mould society on Marxist principles led to political repression and slave labour camps

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
27
Q

How do postmodernists take a relativist position?

A

Rejecting meta-narratives that claim absolute truth, postmodernists take a relativist position. That is, they argue all views are true for those who hold them. No one has special access to the truth-including sociologists. All accounts of reality are equally valid. We should therefore celebrate the diversity of views rather than seek to impose one version of the truth on everyone

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
28
Q

What does Lyotard argue about postmodernism?

A

In postmodern society, knowledge is just a series of different ‘language games’ or ways of seeing the world. However, in his view, postmodern society, with its many competing views of the truth, is preferable to modern society, where meta-narratives claimed a monopoly of truth and sometimes sought to impose it by force, as in the Soviet Union. Postmodernity allows groups who had been marginalised by modern society, such as ethnic minorities and women to be heard

29
Q

What does Baudrillard argue?

A

That knowledge is central to postmodern society. He argues that society is no longer based on the production of material goods, but rather on buying and selling knowledge in the form of images and signs. However, unlike signs in past societies, those today bear no relation to physical reality

30
Q

What are signs like in postmodern society?

A

Signs stand for nothing other than themselves-they are not symbols of some other real thing. Baudrillard calls such signs simulacra. Eg, tabloid newspaper articles about fictitious soap opera characters are ‘signs about signs’ rather than about an underlying reality. Baudrillard describes this situation as hyper-reality: where the signs appear more than reality itself and substitute themselves for reality. However, because the sings do not represent anything, they are literally meaningless. In this respect, Baudrillard is particularly critical of television, which he sees as the main source of simulacra and of our inability to distinguish between image and reality

31
Q

What do postmodernists argue about culture and identify?

A

Argue that culture and identity in postmodern society differ fundamentally from modern society, especially because of the role of the media in creating hyper-reality. The media are all pervading and they produce an endless stream of ever changing images, values and versions of the truth. As a result, culture becomes fragmented and unstable, so that there is no longer a coherent or fixed set of values shared by members of society

32
Q

What does the array of different messages and ideas in postmodernity lead to?

A

The array of different messages and ideas also undermines people’s faith in meta-narratives. Confronted by so many different versions of the truth, people cease to believe wholeheartedly in any one version. Furthermore, given the failure of meta-narratives such as Marxism to deliver a better society, people lose faith in the possibility of rational progress

33
Q

What is identity in postmodernity?

A

In postmodernity, identity also becomes destabilised. Eg, instead of a fixed identity ascribed by our class, we can now construct our own identity from the wide range of images and lifestyles on offer in the media. We can easily change our identity simply by changing our consumption patterns-picking and mixing cultural goods and media-produced images to define ourselves

34
Q

How is Baudrillard pessimistic about the postmodern condition?

A

Media-created hyper-reality leaves us unable to distinguish image from reality. This means we have lost the power to improve society: if we cannot even grasp reality, then we have no power to change it. Political activity to improve the world is impossible, and so the central goal of the Enlightenment project is unachievable. It seems that, while we can change our identity by going shopping, we cannot change society

35
Q

What are the evaluation points for postmodernism?

A

Strengths of the theory, Marxist perspective (Philo and Miller), logical grounds, pessimism, lack of explanation

36
Q

What is a strength of postmodernism?

A

It makes some important points about today’s society, such as the significance of the media for culture and identity. Some also argue its rejection of all-embracing meta-narratives is valuable

37
Q

How doe Philo and Miller criticise postmodernism from a marxist perspective?

A

It ignores power and equality, eg idea media images are unconnected with reality ignores the ruling class’ use of media as a tool of domination. Similarly, the claim that we freely construct our identities through consumption overlooks the effect of poverty in restricting such opportunities. Postmodernists are simply wrong to claim people cannot distinguish between reality and media image. By assuming all views are equally true, it becomes just as valid to deny that the Nazis murdered millions as it does to affirm it-this is a morally indefensible position

38
Q

How can postmodernism be criticised on logical grounds?

A

Eg Lyotard’s theory is self-defeating: why should we believe a theory that claims that no theory has the truth? Moreover, Best and Kellner point that postmodernism is a particularly weak theory: while it identifies some important features of today’s society (such as the importance of the media and consumption), it fails to explain how they came about

39
Q

How can postmodernism be criticised due to their pessimism about the Enlightenment project?

A

Their view that objective knowledge is impossible and that nothing can be done to improve society. Harvey rejects this pessimistic view. He argues that political decisions do make a real difference to people’s lives and that knowledge can be used to solve human problems. Even if our theories cannot guarantee absolute truth, many sociologists argue that they are at least an approximation to it. As such, they are the best guide we have to improving the world

40
Q

How can postmodernism be criticised due to lack of explanation?

A

While postmodernism has identified some important features of today’s society, it is poorly equipped to explain them. By contrast, recent sociological theories have offered more satisfactory explanations of the changes society is undergoing

41
Q

What are theories of late modernity?

A

Unlike postmodernism, theories of late modernity argue the rapid changes we are witnessing are not the dawn of a new, postmodern era. These changes are actually a continuation of modernity itself. However, these theories do recognise that something important is happening

42
Q

Why do theories of late modernity believe we have not moved into postmodernity?

A

In their view, key features of modernity that were always present are still present, but have now become intensified. Eg, social change has always been a feature of modern society, but now the pace of change has gone into overdrive. In other words, we are still within modernity, but we have entered its ‘late’ phase. In this view, if we are still in modern era, then the theories of modernist sociology are still useful. Unlike postmodernism, theories of late modernity do subscribe to the Enlightenment project-they still believe we can discover objective knowledge and use it to improve society

43
Q

What does Giddens believe?

A

According to Giddens, we are now at the stage of late or high modernity. A defining characteristic of modern society is that it experiences rapid change0often on a global scale. This is because of two key features of modernity: disembedding and reflexivity

44
Q

How does Giddens define disembedding?

A

Defines it as ‘the lifting out of social relations from local contexts to interaction’. In other words, today we no longer need face-to-face contact in order to interact-disembedding breaks down geographical barriers and makes interaction more impersonal

45
Q

What does Giddens argue about high modern society?

A

In high modern society, tradition and custom become much less important and no longer serve as a guide to how we should act, and we become more individualistic, eg sons are no longer expected to follow the same occupation as their fathers, but are free to pursue their own individual goals instead

46
Q

How are we now forced to be reflexive?

A

Because tradition no longer tells us how to act, we are forced to become reflexive. That is, we have to constantly monitor, reflect on and modify our actions in the light of information about the possible risks and opportunities that they might involve

47
Q

What is reflexivity?

A

Consequently, reflexivity means we are all continually re-evaluating our ideas and theories-nothing is fixed or permanent, everything is up for challenge. Under these conditions, culture in late modern society becomes increasingly unstable and subject to change

48
Q

Together, what do disembedding and reflexivity account for?

A

They account for the rapid and widespread nature of social change in high modernity. In particular, by enabling social interaction to spread rapidly across the globe, they help to drive globalisation

49
Q

What does Giddens believe about modernity and risk?

A

In late modernity we face a number of high consequence risks-major threats to human society. These include military risks (nuclear war), economic risks (instability of capitalist economy), environmental risks (global warming) and threats to our freedom from increased state surveillance. These are ‘manufactured’ risks (human made, not natural). However Giddens rejects postmodernist view that we cannot intervene to improve things. He believes we can make rational plans to reduce these risks and achieve progress to a better society

50
Q

What does Beck believe?

A

Beck is in the Enlightenment tradition. He believes in the power of reason to create a better world. However, he believes that today’s late modern society-which he calls ‘risk society’-faces new kinds of dangers: in the past society faced dangers as a result of inability to control nature eg drought, famine, disease. Today the dangers are manufactured risks resulting from human activities, such as global warming

51
Q

What does Beck believe about individualisation?

A

Like Giddens, Beck sees late modernity as a period of growing individualisation, in which we become increasingly reflexive. Tradition no longer governs how we act. As a result, we have to think for ourselves and reflect on the possible consequences of out choice of action. This means we must constantly take account of risks attached to different course of action open to us. Beck calls this reflexive modernisation

52
Q

What happens as a result of reflexive modernisation?

A

‘Risk consciousness’ becomes increasingly central to our culture-we become more aware of perceived risks and seek to avoid or minimise them, eg we read of the dangers or benefits of this or that food and change our eating habits accordingly. However, a great deal of our knowledge about risks come from the mass media, which often give a distorted view of the dangers we face

53
Q

What is risk, politics and progress like in late modernity?

A

Postmodernists such as Baudrillard reject Enlightenment project, with its belief in possibility of progress though action based on rational knowledge. Beck disagrees with this position. Although he is sceptical about scientific progress due to risks it has brought, he still believes in our ability to use rationality to overcome them. Because we are capable of reflexivity, we can evaluate risks rationally and take political action to reduce them. Eg Beck looks to new political movements such as environmentalism to challenge the direction of technological development

54
Q

What are the evaluation points for theories of late modernity?

A

Overall evaluation, Rustin’s view, Hirst’s view, strengths of the theory

55
Q

What is the overall evaluation of theories of late modernity?

A

The concept of reflexivity suggests we reflect on our actions and then are free to re-shape our lives accordingly to reduce our exposure to risks. However, not everyone has this option, eg the poor are generally exposed to more environmental risks because they are more likely to live in highly polluted areas, but may be unable to afford to move to a healthier one

56
Q

What is Rustin’s view of theories of late modernity?

A

Criticising Beck, he argues that it is capitalism, with its pursuit of profit at all costs, that is the source of risk, not technology as such

57
Q

What is Hirst’s view of theories of late modernity?

A

Rejects Beck’s view that movements such as environmentalism will bring about significant change, because they are too fragmented to challenge capitalism

58
Q

What is a strength of theories of late modernity?

A

They do provide a sociological alternative to postmodernism. They show that rational analysis of society remains possible. They also recognise that, while our knowledge may never be perfect, we can still use it to improve society and reduce the risks we face

59
Q

What are marxist theories of postmodernity?

A

Like Beck and Giddens, Marxists believe in Enlightenment project of achieving objective knowledge and using it to improve society. Eg Marx claimed that his theory showed how a working class revolution could over throw capitalism and bring an end to exploitation. However, unlike Beck and Giddens, some Marxists such as Jameson and Harvey believe today’s society has indeed moved from modernity to postmodernity. They agree with postmodernists that there have been major changes in society, and they describe postmodern culture in similar terms, emphasising importance of media images, diversity and instability

60
Q

How do Marxists differ from Lyotard and Baudrillard?

A

Marxists offer a very different analysis of postmodernity to Lyotard or Baurdrillard. Rather than seeing postmodernity as a fundamentalist break with the past, Marxists regard it as merely product of most recent stage of capitalism. To understand postmodernity, therefore, we must examine its relationship to capitalism

61
Q

What does Harvey argue about society?

A

For Harvey, capitalism is a dynamic system, constantly developing new technologies and ways of organising production to make profits. However, capitalism is prone to periodic crises of profitability, and these produce major changes. Postmodernity arose out of the capitalist crisis of 1970s, which saw the end of the long economic boom that had lasted since 1945

62
Q

What did the capitalist crisis lead to?

A

It gave rise to a new regime of accumulation-a new way of achieving profitability, which Harvey describes as ‘flexible accumulation’ or post-Fordism. This replaced the more rigid pre-1970s Fordist mass production system

63
Q

What is flexible accumulation?

A

It involves the use of information technology, an expanded service and finance sector, job insecurity and requirement for workers to be ‘flexible’ to fit their employers’ needs. It permits the production of customised products for small, ‘niche’ markets instead of standardised products for mass markets, and easy switching from producing one product to producing one product to producing another

64
Q

What have the changes caused by flexible accumulation lead to?

A

These changes brought many of the cultural characteristics of postmodernity, such as diversity, choice and instability. Eg: production of customised products for niche markets promotes cultural diversity, and easy switching of production from one product to another encourages constant shifts in fashion

65
Q

How has flexible accumulation also brought changes in consumption

A

It turned leisure, culture and identity into commodities. Cultural products such as fashion, music, sports and computer games have become an important source of profit. As Jameson argues, postmodernity represents a more developed form of capitalism because it commodifies virtually all aspects of life including our identities

66
Q

What does Harvey argue about this more developed form of capitalism?

A

It leads to another feature of postmodernity-the compression of time and space. The commodification of culture (eg foreign holidays) the creation of worldview financial markets, and new information and communications technologies, all serve to shrink the globe

67
Q

What do Harvey and Jameson argue about politics and progress?

A

Flexible accumulation has also brought political changes characteristic of postmodernity. In particular, it has weakened the working class and socialist movements. In their place, a variety of oppositional movements have emerged, such as environmentalism, women’s liberation, anti-racism etc. However, Harvey and Jameson are hopeful these new social movements can form a ‘rainbow alliance’ to bring about change

68
Q

Although marxist theorists of postmodernity agree with postmodernists that we have moved from modernity to postmodernity, what do Best and Kellner note

A

Best and Kellner note, they differ from postmodernists in two ways: they retain a faith in Marxist theory as a means of explaining these changes, and they argue that the goal of the Enlightenment project-to change society for the better-can still be achieved

69
Q

What is the evaluation for marxist theories of postmodernity?

A

Marx’s original view of Enlightenment project was it would be achieved by working class leading revolution that would overthrow capitalism and create better society. By contrast, by accepting political opposition to capitalism has fragmented into many different social movements such as feminism and environmentalism, Marxist theories of postmodernity appear to abandon this possibility. However, the strength of these theories is by relating recent changes in society to nature of capitalism, they can offer sociological explanation of them-something postmodernists fail to do