social psych Flashcards

1
Q

What is cognitive dissonance

A

Cognitive dissonance is the psychological discomfort experienced when a person holds two or more contradictory beliefs, values, or behaviors simultaneously.

Example: Feeling uneasy after eating junk food when you believe in healthy eating.

Resolution: People often resolve this discomfort by changing their beliefs, attitudes, or behaviors to restore consistency (e.g., justifying the unhealthy food choice).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What is post-decision dissonance?

A

Definition: Post-decision dissonance is the discomfort or anxiety experienced after making a decision, especially when the choice involves trade-offs.

The more important the decision, the greater the dissonance.

Cognitive Dissonance Theory Prediction: To reduce the discomfort, people unconsciously engage in mental work to justify their decision, often focusing on the positive aspects of the chosen option and downplaying the rejected alternatives.

Example: After buying a car, you may highlight its good features to reassure yourself it was the best choice, even if you had doubts.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What is Justification of Effort

A

The tendency for individuals to increase their liking for something they have worked hard to attain

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Internal vs. External Justification

A

External Justification:
Definition: A reason for dissonant behavior that resides outside the individual.
Example: Telling a lie to avoid hurting someone’s feelings or to avoid punishment.
Internal Justification:
Definition: Reducing dissonance by changing something within yourself, such as your attitude or behavior.
Example: Convincing yourself that a disliked dress isn’t that bad because you already told someone you liked it.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What is dehumanizing the enemy and how does it relate to cognitive dissonance?

A

Dehumanizing the enemy involves portraying them as less than human (e.g., calling them “vermin” or “brutes”). This reduces cognitive dissonance by justifying cruel actions. If someone sees themselves as a good person but engages in violence, dehumanizing the victim helps rationalize the behavior, making it easier to justify cruelty.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What is insufficient punishment?

A

Back: Insufficient punishment happens when a mild threat is given for an action, creating little external justification for compliance. This leads to dissonance, which individuals resolve by internally justifying their actions, often changing their attitudes to match their behavior.

Example:
A child refrains from playing with a forbidden toy after being mildly threatened. To reduce dissonance, they convince themselves they no longer like the toy, leading to a lasting change in their attitude.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

The Hypocrisy Paradigm

A

Hypocrites judge others more harshly than do people who have not committed the same unethical acts, and they present themselves as being more virtuous and ethical than everyone else.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Self-Affirmation Theory

A

The idea that people can reduce threats to their self-esteem by af- firming themselves in areas unre- lated to the source of the threat

focusing on how great we are in some completely different area of our lives.

E.g. I’m a smoker…. but I’m a terrific cook!

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Self-Evaluation Maintenance Theory

A

self-evaluation maintenance theory, people will experience dissonance in relationships when three conditions are met:
We feel close to another person, he or she is outperforming us in a particular area, and that area is central to our self-esteem. So there is no problem if a close friend outper- forms us in an area that is not particularly important to us. In fact, we feel even better about ourselves for having such a talented friend. Dissonance only occurs when a close friend outperforms us on a task that is important to the way we de- fine ourselves.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

terror management theory

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What is self concept

A

The overall set of beliefs that people have about their personal attributes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Independent View of the Self vs Interdependent view of self

A

Independent: A way of defining oneself in terms of one’s own internal thoughts, feelings, and actions and not in terms of the thoughts, feelings, and actions of other people

Interdependent: A way of defining oneself in terms of one’s relationships to other people, recognizing that one’s behavior is often determined by the thoughts, feelings, and actions of others

Cultural difference

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

What are the four main functions of the self?

A

Self-Knowledge: Understanding who we are and organizing that information.
Self-Control: Making plans and executing decisions.
Impression Management: Presenting ourselves to others in a way that shapes how they see us.
Self-Esteem: Maintaining positive views of ourselves.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Self-perception theory

A

argues that when our attitudes and feelings are uncertain or ambiguous, we infer these states by observing our behavior and the situation in which it occurs

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What is the difference between intrinsic and extrinsic motivation, and what is the overjustification effect?

A

Intrinsic Motivation: The desire to engage in an activity because we enjoy it or find it interesting, without reliance on external rewards.
Extrinsic Motivation: The desire to engage in an activity due to external rewards or pressures, rather than personal enjoyment.
Overjustification Effect: When individuals attribute their behavior to external rewards, they may underestimate their intrinsic motivation. This can lead to a decrease in interest in the activity once the rewards are removed.
Example: If a child who loves reading begins receiving pizza for every book read, they may start reading not for enjoyment but to earn rewards, potentially reducing their love for reading over time.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

T wo-Factor Theory of Emotion

A

The idea that emotional experience is the result of a two-step self-perception process in which people first experience physiological arousal and then seek an appropriate explanation for it

17
Q

What are fixed and growth mindsets, and how do they influence motivation and success?

A

ixed Mindset: The belief that abilities are static and unchangeable. Individuals with this mindset view failure as a sign of lacking ability, leading to increased likelihood of giving up after setbacks.
Growth Mindset: The belief that abilities can be developed through hard work, strategies, and perseverance. Those with a growth mindset see setbacks as opportunities to improve and are more likely to persist through challenges.
Example: Students with a fixed mindset may stop trying after receiving a disappointing grade, believing they simply aren’t smart enough. In contrast, students with a growth mindset will likely seek new strategies and work harder to improve their performance on future tests.

18
Q

How do social comparison theory, upward and downward comparisons, and social tuning influence our self-perceptions and attitudes?

A

Social Comparison Theory: This theory posits that we learn about our own abilities and attitudes by comparing ourselves to others, especially when there is no objective standard.

Upward Social Comparison: Comparing ourselves to those who are better in a specific area. This can motivate us but may also lead to feelings of inferiority.
Downward Social Comparison: Comparing ourselves to those who are worse off, often to boost our self-esteem and feel better about our own abilities.
Social Tuning: This is the process of adopting the attitudes of others, particularly when we want to get along with them. For example, we might unconsciously adopt a friend’s opinion if we like them, or reject an unlikable person’s views.

19
Q

What is Attribution Theory and how does it relate to understanding behavior?

A

A: Attribution Theory describes how individuals explain the causes of their own and others’ behavior. It emphasizes two types of attributions:

Internal Attribution: Assigning behavior to personal characteristics (e.g., personality, attitude).
External Attribution: Assigning behavior to situational factors (e.g., environment, circumstances). Understanding these attributions helps clarify why we perceive others’ actions in different ways, influencing our social interactions and relationships.

20
Q

What are the three types of information used in the Covariation Model to form attributions?

A

Harold Kelley’s Covariation Model identifies three key types of information:

Consensus Information: How do others behave towards the same stimulus? (e.g., Do other people yell at Hannah?)
Distinctiveness Information: How does the actor behave towards different stimuli? (e.g., Does the boss yell at other employees?)
Consistency Information: How consistent is the actor’s behavior towards the same stimulus across different situations? (e.g., Does the boss regularly yell at Hannah?) These factors help determine whether to make an internal or external attribution regarding a person’s behavior.

21
Q

Self-Serving Attributions

A

Definition:
Attributions that people make to explain their successes as a result of internal, dispositional factors (e.g., intelligence, effort) while blaming external, situational factors for their failures (e.g., unfair test, bad luck).

Purpose:
To maintain self-esteem and manage impressions; helps individuals feel more positive about themselves despite setbacks.

22
Q

Fundamental Attribution Error (FAE)

A

The tendency to overestimate the influence of internal traits and underestimate the impact of situational factors when explaining others’ behavior (e.g., concluding someone is unfriendly without considering external circumstances).

Example:
In the Jones and Harris (1967) study, participants assumed the author’s political views reflected personal beliefs, even when the author had no choice in the essay position, illustrating the bias toward internal attributions.

23
Q

What is conformity

A

A change in one’s behavior due to real or imagined influence of other people

24
Q

Informational Social Influence

A

The process of relying on the behavior of others as a source of information to guide one’s own actions, especially in ambiguous or unclear situations.

Key Concepts:

Conformity: Adjusting behaviors to align with the group; not due to a lack of self-reliance but as a way to gain accurate information.
Private Acceptance: Conforming to others’ behavior because you genuinely believe they are correct.
Public Compliance: Conforming publicly without believing in the group’s correctness.
Example:
In Sherif’s (1936) experiment, participants initially had varying estimates of how much a stationary light moved (the autokinetic effect). When placed in a group, their estimates converged, indicating that they relied on the group’s judgment to define reality.

25
Q

When Will People Conform to Informational Social Influence?

A

Ambiguity: People are most likely to conform when the situation is ambiguous. Uncertainty about how to respond leads individuals to seek guidance from others.

Example: Soldiers unsure of how to act in a confusing combat scenario may mimic the behavior of their peers.
Crisis Situations: During crises, immediate action is often required, leading people to look to others for cues on how to respond, even if those others are also panicking.

Example: Passengers on an airplane may look to flight attendants during an emergency to determine the appropriate response.
Presence of Experts: Individuals are more likely to conform when observing those with expertise in a given situation, as their reactions are deemed more credible.

Example: A tourist may rely on local residents’ reactions to unfamiliar street signs instead of fellow tourists.

26
Q

Normative Social Influence

A

Going along with what other people do to be liked and accepted by them, which leads to public conformity with the group’s beliefs and behaviors but not always private acceptance of them

27
Q

Social Norms

A

The implicit or explicit rules a group has for the acceptable behaviors, values, and beliefs of its members

28
Q

ii

A
29
Q

What factors contributed to the high levels of obedience observed in Milgram’s study, and how did participants rationalize their actions?

A

A: Participants were influenced by normative social pressure to conform to the authority of the experimenter, who was insistent and presented as an expert. They rationalized their actions through self-justification, as they increased shocks in small increments, making it easier to continue obeying despite moral concerns.

30
Q
A