Social Pack One - Obedience Flashcards

1
Q

Key assumptions of social psychology

A

The approach assumes that other people can affect our behaviour thought processes and emotions
Suggests that the social situation can affect …
Being in groups in society can also affect behaviour- we respond differently to people depending on the group that they are in - favour members of own group
The roles that we play in society affect behaviour

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Social influence

A

When an individual’s behaviour attitudes or emotions are affected by someone else

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Obedience

A

Is a form of social influence, means obeying direct orders from someone of authority

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Compliance

A

Part of obedience- going along with what someone says while not necessarily agreeing with it

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Dissenting

A

Where the orders are rejected

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Internalising

A

Obey with agreement

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Conformity

A

Adopt the behaviours and attitudes of those around you

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Obedience study

A

Milgram 1963

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Social agency theory

A

Milgram - 1973-4
Two states
Autonomous - person believes that they have the power in I control own moral code
Agentic - someone else to direct their behaviour- not responsible for consequences of own actions
May act agains moral code
Evolution survival strategy - following leaders rather than acting independently
Agentic - learned in childhood
Legal system
Moral strain

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Evidence for agency theory

A

Milgrans study
Moral strain
Dicplcmet of responsibility
Supported by other research

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Evidence against agency theory

A

Lacks direct evidence mentalnprocess so can’t be directly observed
Description rather than explanation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Methodology agency theory

A

Standardised procedures
Lacks mundane realism - doesn’t generalise outside of lab experiments

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Applications agency theory

A

Real life events - us soldiers in the beitnam war
Holding er Al showed nurses obey doctors orders

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Alternative theory agency theory

A

Does not explain motivational issues behind obedience
Social impact theory

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Social impact theory

A

Bibb latane 1981
How likley we are to be influenced by others
The presence of others causes changes to behaviour
Person impacted is target influence if is source
Strength - status authority or age
Immediacy - the distance in space and time
Number how many sources and targets in group
Multiplication of impact
Division of impact

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Evidence for social impact theory

A

Milgram variations study
Two peers rebelled lowered obedience to 10%
Milgram a variation 7

17
Q

Evidence against social impact theory

A

Ignores individual differences
Does not explain why problem are influenced by others

18
Q

Methodology of social impact theory

A

Both lab and feild increases scientific credibility + standardised procedures and controls

Could be considered reductionist as uses mathematical formula so explain complex behaviours

19
Q

Factors affecting obedience

A

Individual differences, situational variables culture

20
Q

Individual differences affecting obedience personality

A

Locus of control- Ritter 1966
External locus believe their behaviour is largely out of their control
Internal - responsible for their own actions

Authoritarianism
Hostility to people with different face social group age sexuality
Submissive to authority hatch to those who dream subordinate to themselves
Adorno f scale to marshes
Milgram and elms obedient participants had higher f scale indications authoritarian personality

Empathy
High levels of empathy less obedient to harm sometime
Burger 2009 did not translate

21
Q

Gender in obedience

A

Milgram variation - 40 female teachers
Found they we vertically identical to
But reported level of anxiety much higher
Same in Burger
Blasts 1999 consistently across 9/10 studies
Kilhsm and Mann -women far less ones rn 16% to 40%
Overall makes no difference

22
Q

Situational variables affecting obedience

A

Momentum of compliance - starts if with small trivial requests then goes onto to bigger ones to participate feels duty bound
Proximity - the closer the authority figure the higher level of obedience - Milgram
Status of authority figure - higher when authority figure seemed legitimate
- eg prestigious Yale uni
Personal responsibility- obedience higher when they felt someone else was responsible for harming

23
Q

The effect of culture of obedience

A

Individualist eg bro again and America behave independently
Collectivist china isreal cooperation and compliance
Ancona and parry’s on 1968 - replication of Milgram a study in Italy obedience rate of 80% but max was 330 and only used students
Slater 2006 virtual reality - shocks given to a computer generated avatar found similar results uk vs us