Social Influence: Evaluation Flashcards
Types of Conformity and Explanations for Conformity AO3
- difficulties distinguishing between complaince and internalisation
+ research support for NSI eg smoking take up (Linkerbach and Perkins)
+ research support for ISI eg attitudes about African Americans (Witternbrink and Henley)
Variables Affecting Conformity AO3
- asch’s research a ‘child of its time’ (Perrin and Spencer)
- we know very little about the effects of larger majority sizes on conformity levels
- unconvincing confederates - Mori and Arai oveercame this problem. similar results to Asch
- cultural differences in conformity - Smith et al found conformity rates higher in collectivist cultures
Conformity to Social Roles AO3
- conformity to roles isn’t automatic - Haslam and Reicher argue the guards chose how to behave rather than blindly conforming to their social role
- demand characteristics - Banuaziz and Movahaci agrue that participants’ behaviour in the SPE was a response to powerful demand characteristics
- ethical issues - followed ethical guidlines but participants still suffered
+ SPE and relevance to Abu Ghraib - similarities between SPE and prisoner abuses at Abu Ghraib
Situational Variables Affecting Obedience AO3
- internal validity - Orne and Holland claim many ps saw through the deception
+ historical validity - Milgram’s findings still as relevant today. No relationship between year of study and obedience levels found (Blass)
+ power of uniform - research support
Agentic State and Legitimacy of Authority AO3
- agentic state doesn’t explain gradual transitions found in Nazi doctors
- agentic state or cruelty? obedient behaviour may be due to a desire to inflict harm on others
+ agentic shift is a common response when a person loses self-control (Fennis and Aarts) - legitmacy can serve as basis for justifying harm to others
+ Tarnow provides support for power of legitimate authority in aircraft cockpits
Authoritarian Personality AO3
+ research evidence - correlation between RWA scores and maximum voltage shock (Danbrun and Vatine)
- social context explanations more flexible
- differences - many fully obedient ps had good relationship with parents
Social Support AO3
+ social support in conformity studies more effective when from first responder in group
+ research demonstrates importance of social support in resisting pressure to drink (Rees and Wallace)
+ the rosenstrasse protest showed power of social support
Locus of Control AO3
- related to NSI but not ISI (Spector)
+ research support - people in high externality more easily persuaded and more likely to conform (Avtgis)
Minority Influence AO3
+ research support for flexibility (Nemeth and Brilmayer)
+ real value of minority influence is that it ‘opens the mind’ (Nemeth)
- Mackie argues that it’s the majority rather than the minority that processes information more
+ tipping point for commitment - percentage of commited opinion holders necessary to ‘tip’ the majority was 10% (Xie et al)
- minority influence in name only - difficult to convince people of the evalue of dissent
Social Influence Processes in Social Change AO3
- social change through minority influence is gradual
- being perceived as ‘deviant’ limits the influence of minorities
- social norms interventions have their limitations - not all have led to social change eg DeJong et al