Brainscape's Knowledge GenomeTM


Top Flashcards (Certified)
All Flashcards

Psychology > Research Methods: Key Terms > Flashcards

Research Methods: Key Terms Flashcards

1
Q

Case Studies

A

an in depth investigation often of a single individual, event or small group

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Interval Data

A

numerical data that is ordered and in objective units

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Ordinal Data

A

numerical data that is ordered but subjective, difference between items need not be the same

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Nominal Data

A

data separated into categories

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Standard Deviation

A

measure of spread of data around mean, calculates average distance from mean of all scores

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Correlation Coefficients

A

a numerical representation of a correlation, range from -1 (strong negative correlation) to +1 (strong positive correlation)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Covariables

A

the variables that are measured in a correlation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Correlation

A

the measurement of a relationship between 2 or more variables shows a relationship not the causation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Interviewer Bias

A

where expectations or opinions of interviewer interferes with judgement of interviewee

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Self Report Techniques

A

research methods in which ps give info about themselves (without researcher interference)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Social Desirability Bias

A

participants answer qs in a manner that will be viewed favourably by others

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Structured Interview

A

made up of pre determined set of qs asked in fixed order, standardised

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Investigator Effects

A

when the investigator directly or indirectly has an effect on a ps performance

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Demand Characteristics

A

when a subject picks up cues during an experiment therefore possibly affecting + altering the results

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Mundane Realism

A

whether or not task ps are asked to do represent something they would experience and do in real life

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Internal Validity

A

concerns things that go on whithin a study that may affect accuracy

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Ecological Validity

A

concerns whether results can be generalised to other settings

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Temporal Validity

A

concerns whether results can be generalised to other times

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Population Validity

A

concerns whether results can be generalised to other people

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

External Validity

A

concerns whether results can be generalised to different situations

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

Quasi Experiment

A

IV is naturally occuring + is impossible to manipulate, cant be randomly assigned to experimental + control groups

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

Natural Experiment

A

conducted when not possible, ethically or practically, to manipulate IV. DV can be tested in a lab

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

Field Experiment

A

controlled experiment conducted outside a lab, IV is manipulated but difficult to control extraneous + confounding variables, ps unaware, cause + effect inferred

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

Lab Experiment

A

an experiment carried out in a controlled setting, ps are aware, variables carefully controlled, artificial materials, cause + effect are established

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Volunteer Sampling
advertise in newspaper/notice board or internet, variety of ps, volunteer bias: have more time, are helpful, need money
26
Systematic Sampling
using predetermined system to select participants, same number has to be applied consistently unbiased, only truly unbiased if use random method to come up with number
27
Stratified Sampling
subgroups are identified within a population and participants are obtained from each strata in proportion to their occurence in the population, selection using random, representative, time consuming
28
Opportunity Sampling
select people who are most easily available, easy, biased
29
Random Sampling
random technique, every member of target population has equal chance, may take time
30
Confounding Variable
variables that arent IV but varies systematically with IV, can stop from establishing cause + effect
31
Extraneous Variable
variables that change other than IV and are quite difficult to control, they make it difficult to detect a significant effect
32
Pilot Study
small scale practice run of study to identify problems in design, method or analysis
33
Standardisation
everything said must be scripted in advance to ensure fairness across conditions
34
Matched Pairs Design
two equal groups used, one for each condition with the ps matched based on key variables
35
Repeated Measures Design
only one group of ps is used for both conditions of the experiment
36
Independent Groups Design
a separate group of ps for each condition of the experiment
37
Experimental Design
how the ps are picked to stop other things interfering with results
38
Null Hypothesis
states that there will be no difference between the 2 conditions in the experiment
39
Non Directional Hypothesis
a hypothesis that states there would be a difference between the 2 conditions but wouldnt specify the direction it would go
40
Directional Hypothesis
a hypothesis that indicates which direction the results will go
41
Operationalism
strictly defining the variables into measurable factors
42
Dependent Variable (DV)
what you measure in an experiment
43
Independent Variable (IV)
what you change in an experiment
44
Aim
starts with 'to investigate/to establish'
45
Cost Benefit Analysis
a balance between the best interests of the ps and the value of the research
46
Controlled Observation
behaviour is observed under conditions where certain variables have been organised by the researcher
47
Naturalistic Observation
it takes place in an everyday setting with no interference
48
Overt Observation
the ps are aware they are being studied
49
Covert Observation
it is kept secret from the ps that they are being studied
50
Participant Observation
the observations are being made by someone who is also participating in the activity being observed
51
Non-Participant Observation
the observer is separate from the people being observed
52
Reporting Psychological Investigations: Title
- concise and informative - contains variables and researcher names
53
Reporting Psychological Investigations: Abstract
- summary (150-200 words) of the entire report - first thing in the report - some detail of the aims, procedure, findings and conslusion
54
Reporting Psychological Investigations: Introduction
- review of background studies in the same area - includes aims and hypothesis - short essay
55
Reporting Psychological Investigations: Method
- mention experimental design, population, sample, sampling method, equipment, procedure, ethics
56
Reporting Psychological Investigations: Results
- contains descriptive and inferential statistics
57
Reporting Psychological Investigations: Discussion
- summary of the results and small explanation - relationship of results to background research - evaluation of the investigation (methodological critique) - suggestions for future research - implications for psychological theory and real life
58
Reporting Psychological Investigations: References
- list of all the sources and where to find original articles
59
Reporting Psychological Investigations: Appendices
- material that would overload the report eg raw data or research tool
60
Descriptive Statistics
provide overview of trends in the form of a graph, table or chart
61
Inferential Statistics
show if the results obtained are significant eg sign test
62
Meta-Analysis
a researcher looks at the findings from a number of different studies and produces a statistic to represent the overall effect
63
Content Analysis
a kind of observational study in which behaviour is observed indirectly in written or verbal material such as interviews, conversations, books, diaries or TV programmes
64
Thematic Analysis
identifying emerging facts that we identify during and after analysing the data
65
p Value
- the probability that the obtained results are due to chance - anywhere between 0 and 1 - 1 means it's very likely that they were down to chance - 0 means that it's unlikely
66
What to do with the null hypothesis when you have p
- if p is less than the significance level you reject the null hypothesis - if p is more than the significance level you accept the null hypothesis
67
Type I Error
- a false positive - falsely rejecting the null hypothesis - the probablity of the type I error is the significance level
68
Type II Error
- a false negative - falsely accepting the null hypothesis
69
4 Stages of Statistical Testing
1) set a significance level 2) obtain data 3) calculate p 4) reject/accept null hypothesis
70
The Normal Significance Level and Why
- 5% - it balances the probability of a type I error and a type II error occurring - 95% sure the results didn't happen by chance
71
What Happens When Significance Level is Too Low
- test is too stringent - too difficult to acheive significance - overlooks true effects because they didn't achieve significance
72
What Happens When Significance Level is Too High
- test is too lenient - too easy to achieve significance - detects true differences where in actual fact the results are due to chance
73
Face Validity
- an intuitive assessment of whether the test actually measures what it sets out to measure - the degree to which an experiment assesses the aims stated at the beginning
74
Concurrent Validity
- whether or not a test correlates with a previously validated test - the extent of which 2 experiments agree with eachother - must have a correlation of above +0.8 to have high concurrent validity
75
Lie Scale
- asks the same question in different ways at different times in the questionnaire to see whether a participants answers are consistent - if they are consistent then it's valid
76
Interpretive Validity
- ask the participants if they agree with the interpretation of the outcome/results made by the researcher - if they agree then it's valid
77
Purpose of Inferential Statistics
allow us to make inference/decision about whether to accept or reject the null hypothesis
78
Objectivity
not affected by expectations or bias
79
Empirical Method
method of investigation that relies on direct observation or testing
80
Replicability
the repeatability of a procedure and/or outcome of a study
81
Falsifiability
the possibility that a statement or hypothesis can be proven wrong
82
Theory Construction
a collection of general principles that explain observations and facts
83
Hypothesis Testing
the process of testing the validity of a theory by testing the predictions that it makes
84
Paradigms and Paradigm Shifts
a shared set of assumptions about the subject matter of a discipline and the methods approprtiate to its study
85
7 Features of Science
1) objectivity 2) empirical method 3) replicability 4) falsifiability 5) theory construction 6) hypothesis testing 7) paradigms and paradigm shifts

Psychology (22 decks)

Brainscape helps you reach your goals faster, through stronger study habits.
© 2025 Bold Learning Solutions. Terms and Conditions