Social Influence Flashcards

1
Q

Compliance definition

A

The lowest level of conformity

A person changes their public behaviour (the way they act) but not their private beliefs

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Identification definition

A

Temporarily developing habits, attitudes or behaviours of a group if they value and wish to be in the group

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Internalisation definition

A

When an individual changes their public behaviour to fit in with a group while agreeing with them privately

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Informative Social Influence (ISI)

A

When a person conforms to the behaviour or opinion of the majority because they believe they are a source of the correct information

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Normative Social Influence (NSI)

A

A change in behaviour that is necessary to fit in with a particular group

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Asch’s line experiment to observe conformity (PROCEDURE)

A

Procedure
- 123 American men tested

  • IV = Response of the confederates, DV = Participants response to the same question
  • P’s saw two white cards: line X (standard line) on the left and lines A B C on the right (comparison lines)
  • On each trial participants had to say out loud which comparison line matches the standards lines
  • Participants tested in groups of 6 to 8
  • Naive Ps always seated 2nd from last
  • Confederates gave the wrong (scripted) answers each time
  • Naive P didn’t know confederates were fake Ps
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Asch’s line experiment to observe conformity (AIM)

A

Aim: To investigate whether participants would conform and give the incorrect answer in situations where the correct answers are clear

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Asch’s line experiment to observe conformity (RESULTS)

A

On average, Naive participants agreed with confederates’ incorrect answers 37% of the time

  • 25% of participants never gave a wrong answer (never conformed)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Asch’s line experiment to observe conformity (CONCLUSION)

A

People are willing to ignore reality and give an incorrect answer in order to confirm with the rest of the group

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Variables affecting conformity

A
  • Group size
  • Unanimity
  • Task difficulty
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Group Size aims and procedures

A

Aim: To investigate whether the size of the group would be more important than the agreement of the group

Procedure: Same as baseline. Varied number of confederates

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Group size Conclusions and Results

A

Rea
Conclusion: Results suggest most people are very sensitive to views or others because one/two confederates are enough to sway opinions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Unanimity aims and procedures

A

Aim: To investigate if the presence of a non-conforming person affects the Naive P’s conformity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Minority influence definition

A

A form of social influence where a minority (smaller group or one person) tries to change others views, beliefs or attitudes

Minority influence csn eventually lead to internalisation. Public behaviours are changed or adapted and private beliefs are accepted

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

3 main processes in Minority Influence

A
  1. Consistency
  2. Commitment
  3. Flexibility
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Consistency in minority influence

A

Over time the consistent message from the minority csn influence the views of the majority

Consistency can come in 2 forms
1. Synchronic - All saying the same things (everyone in minority)
2. Diachronic - saying the message for a long time

17
Q

What does synchronic mean [minority influence]

A

The minority are all saying the same message

(Consistency is what makes other people rethink their ideas - minority influence(

18
Q

What does diachronic mean [minority influence]

A

Saying the same message for a long time

(Consistency is what makes people change their mind)

19
Q

Examples of Synchronic/Diachronic [Minority influence]

A
20
Q

What does commitment mean [minority influence]

A

How far the minority group are willing to go to draw attention to their views

  • Engaging in extreme activities
  • Important the extreme activities have some risk to minority -> demonstrates commitment
21
Q

Aim of Moscovichi’s APRC 1969 [minority influence]

A

To investigate the influence of a consistent vs inconsistent minority

22
Q

Procedure of Moscovichis experiment (1969)

Hint: Think about conditions of groups/group size, aim, results and procedure

A
  • Laboratory experiment
  • 122 women split into groups of 6 asked to judged colour of 36 slides
  • ## All slides blue but intensity of slides differedConditions
    1. Consistent minority
    Groups: 4x real participants x 2 confederates
    Confederates answered green for all 36 slides
  1. Inconsistent majority
    Groups: Same as consistent majority
    4x Real participants, 2x confederates
    Confederates answered green for 24/36 of slides and 12/36 for blue
  2. Control Group
    These group of participants had no experimental treatment/manipulation
23
Q

Results and conclusion from Moscovichi’s APRC (1969)

A

Results:
True participants agreed with consistent confederates green vote 8.42% of the time

Agreement fell to 1.25% with a consistent majority

Control groups got it wrong only 0.25% of the time

Conclusion:
Consistent minority influence can affect the majority, but the influence is weaker when minority is inconsistent