Social Influence Flashcards

cook tho i wont use thsi probably

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

What was the aim of Asch’s study?

A

To investiagte group pressure in an unambigious situation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What was the method of Asch’s study?

A

There were 123 american men as participants. They were given 2 cards, one with a standard line and 3 with comparison lines. In every group there was 1 naive participant and the rest were confederates. There were 12 critical trials where the confederates gave wrong answers and the naive participant was always last to answer.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What were the results of asch study>

A

On the critical trials, the participants gave the wrong answer 1/3 of the time. 25% never gave a wrong answer

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What is the conclusion of asch’s study?

A

That people are influenced by group pressure but many can resist.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What was the evaluation of aschs study?

A

One weakness was it was only reflective of conformity in 1950s america
Another weakness was it was an artifical task, doesn’t reflect everyday situations
further weaknes was results can;t be generailsed to collectivist cultures where rates are higher

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

How did group size affect asch’s study?

A

Two confederates = 13.6% confomrity
three confederates = 31.8% conformity. more than 3 made little differnce

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

How did anonymity affect asch’s study?

A

Writing answer down is anonymous and conformity lower

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

How did task dificulty affect asch’s study?

A

If comparison lines more similart o standard this makes task harder, conformity increases

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

How does personality affect asch’s study?

A

High internal locus of control, conform less. Burger and Cooper found internals less likley to agree with a confederates rating of a cartoon

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

How does expertise affect asch’s study?

A

More knowledgable people = conform less. Lucas found maths experts les likley to conform to others answers on maths problems

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What was the aim of milgras study?

A

To investiagte if Germans are different in terms of obedience

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

what was the method of milgrams study?

A

There were 40 male volunetters. Teacher insturcted by experimenter to give a shock if learner answered a quesion incorectly

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

what was the conclusion of milgrams study?

A

Obedience related to social factors not dispostion e.g location,novel situation

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

what was the results of milgrams study?

A

No paricipant (teacher) stopped below 300v. 65% shocked to 450v
There was extreme tension e.g three had seizures

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What was the evaluation of milgrams study?

A

One weakess was lacked realsim
Another weakness was ther were severe ethical issues
One strength is that it was supported by other research

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What was the agentic state?

A

Follow orders with no responsibility

17
Q

What is the autonomous state?

A

Own free choice

18
Q

How did authority affetc milgrams agencey theory>

A

Agentic shift: moving from making own free choice to following orders occurs when someone is in authority

19
Q

How does culture affect milgrams agency theory? - the social hierachy

A

Some people have more authority than others. Hierachy depends on society and socilisation.

20
Q

How does proximity affect milgrams agencey theory?

A

particiopants lesss obedient in milgrams study when in same rom as learner increasin moral strain

21
Q

What is the evaluation of milgrams agecney theory

A

One strength is that there is research support for it. One weakness is it doesn’t explain all findings and why there is no 100% obedience in milgrams study
another weakness is that it gave people an excuse for destructive behaviour

22
Q

What is the authoritatrian personality?

A

some people have a strong respect for authority and look down on people of lower status

23
Q

what is cognitive style in the authoritain personality theory?

A

Rigid steroertypes and don;t like change

24
Q

How does the authoritarian personality orginate in childhood.

A

Strict parents only show love if behaviour is correct. Thesse alues are internalised.

25
Q

What is scapegoating in the authoritain personality theory?

A

Hostility felt towards parents for beiig crticial is put onto peopel who are socially inferior

26
Q

What is the evaluation for the authoritarian personality?

A

One weakness was authoritain personality was mesaured on f-scale which has response bias
another wakness was results are correlational, can’t say authoritarain personality casues greater obedience
furrther wakness was of a dispositional explanation is that on its own it cannot explain all cases of obedience

27
Q

What was the aim of pilvains subway study?

A

To investigate if charcaterists of a victim affect help given in an emergencey

28
Q

What wass the method of pilavins subwayu study?

A

Male confedearet collapsed on subway. 103 trials. victim appeared to be drunk or apeared to be a disabled(had cane)

29
Q

Wat where the results of pilavins subway study

A

Disabled victim given help on 95% of trials compared to 50% helped when drunk. Help was aslikley in crowded and empty carriagdes.

30
Q

What was the conclusion of pilavins subway study?

A

Characteristcs of a victim affects help given. number on onlookers doesnt affect help in nautral settingx

31
Q

what was the evaluation of pilavins subway study

A

One strength was ther is high realism, they ddint kow their behaviour was being studied so they acted more naturally
One wakness was it was an urban sample so participants from the city may be used to emergencies
one strength was there was qualative data such as passengar remarks

32
Q
A