social identity theory and group processes Flashcards
social identity approach is different from social identity theory… true or false?
TRUE
Our self-esteem derives from
our personal identity and the status and accomplishments of the various groups to which we belong.
in-group favouritism?
by ensuring we feel good about our in-group, we ensure we feel good about ourselves. we look for positives in our in group and that makes us feel good and that often leads too ETHNOCENTRISM
ethnocentrism?
the evaluation of other cultures/groups according to preconceptions originating in the standards and customs of ones own culture/groups.
ethno =
culture
briefly explain the minimal group paradigm?
people will tend to reduce the benefit to the ingroup if it means maximizing the detriment to the outgroup.
being able to exercise ingroup favouritism led to…
higher self-esteem measures.
explain the minimal group paradigm…
even when there were opportunities for equal distribution of points/pennies, participants often picked less for the ingroup if it meant substantially less also for the outgroup.
numerous repetitions have shown a bias for preferring …
relative gain over the outgroup versus ABSOLUTE GAIN for the ingroup.
competition triumphs over….
cooperation, even when the groups formed are meaningless and individual members lack group identity investment < obvious consequences for groups where investments in group memberships are high.
identify 3 main strategies to improve your ingroup’s status ( if you are in a stigmatized / low status group)
social competition, social creativity, social mobility.
social competition?
directly challenging an outgroups higher status position < common in sport competitions ( especially those involving violence, can elevate physiological arousal, potentially setting the stage for transforming hostile inclinations into aggressive behaviour)
social creativity?
re-defining the relevance of particular comparators, asserting ‘alternative’ dimensions of comparison as being important. OR. subdividing the devalued group to create a subgroup (excluding the self), which is more deserving of the devaluation than the group as a whole.
social mobility?
group boundries: permeable or impermeable, stable or unstable ( is there an opportunity to move to another group?) < separating from the group to move to a higher status group < abstratct psychological distancing ( reduced levels of investment ect)
social mobility is….
an individual level strategy > leaving a socially undesirable or stigmatized group in favour of a higher status group