Social Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

ISI support

A

LUCAS

  • Greater conformity to incorrect answers when maths questions more difficult.
  • Most true for students with poorer mathematical ability.

ASCH

Conformity increased when standard and comparison lines closer in length.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

NSI support

A

ASCH

  • Ppts conformed to incorrect answer 36.8% of the time.
  • Claimed because afraid of disapproval.
  • When ppts wrote down answers conformity fell to 12.5%.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

ISI individual differences

A

ASCH

Students less conformist than other ppts; 28% vs 36.8%.

PERRIN AND SPENCER

Asch repeat with engineering students and found only 1 student conformed in 396 trials.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

KEY STUDY: Asch (conformity)

A

ASCH

Procedure:

  • 123 American male undergraduates tested alongside 6-8 confederates.
  • Each ppts took part in 18 trails, 12 of which critical (confederates gave wrong answer).
  • Ppts shown 2 large white cards at a time; standard line on one and 3 comparison lines on the other.
  • Answer was obvious.

Findings

  • Ppts conformed 36.8% of the time.
  • 75% ppts conformed at least once.
  • Claimed conformed due to NSI.
  • Students conformed 28% of the time.
  • Conformity dropped to 12.5% when wrote answers down.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Asch variations (conformity)

A

ASCH

  1. Group size - majority of more than 3 made little difference; 32% with 3 confederates.
  2. Unanimity - dissenting confederate dropped conformity by 1/4.
  3. Task difficulty - conformity increased when standard and comparison lines closer in length (ISI).
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Asch against

A

PERRIN AND SPENCER

Only 1 student conformed in 396 trials of engineering students.

NETO

Women more conformist.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

KEY STUDY: Zimbardo (conformity to social roles)

A

ZIMBARDO

Procedure:

  • 24 mentally stable volunteer students randomly allocated role of prisoner or guard.
  • Prisoners arrested in their homes, blind-folded, strip-searched and given uniform and identification number.
  • Guards had identical uniforms, clubs and handcuffs. and worked shifts 3 at a time. Told had complete power over the prisoners.

Findings:

  • Guards harassed and punished prisoners e.g. headcounts in the middle of the night.
  • Prisoners rebelled on day 2 by shouting/swearing/ripping uniforms. Guards retaliated with fire extinguishers.
  • Prisoners became depressed and subdued: 1 released on first day due to psychological disturbance, 2 more on 4th and 1 went on hunger strike (was force-fed by guards, put in ‘the hole’ and shunned by prisoners.
  • 90% of conversation prison related.
  • Stopped after 6 of intended 14 days.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Zimbardo against

A

HASLAM AND REICHER

Replication of Zimbardo called ‘BBC prison study’. Prisoners took control and harassed guards; guards failed to develop shared identity (social identity theory) and conform to roles.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

KEY STUDY: Milgram (obedience)

A

MILGRAM

Procedure:

  • 40 men aged 20-50 from newspaper advertisement (told participating in memory study).
  • Paid $4.50 at outset.
  • Rigged draw meant ppt always teacher and ‘Mr Wallace’ learner.
  • Teacher instructed to give increasing ‘shocks’ when learner made mistake/didn’t answer in simple word pair task.
  • Shocks ranged from 15V ‘slight shock’ to 450V ‘danger: extreme shock’. At 300V ‘intense shock’ learner pounded on wall, at 315V pounded again and gave no further responses.
  • 4 prods gave by experimenter:
    1. ‘Please continue’
    2. ‘The experiment requires that you continue’
    3. ‘It is absolutely essential that you continue’
    4. ‘You have no other choice, you must go on’

Findings:

  • None stopped before 300V (12.5%).
  • 65% continued to highest level.
  • Ppts showed signs of extreme tension e.g. sweating, mumbling. 3 had ‘full blown uncontrollable seizures’.
  • 84% said glad participated in survey.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Milgram support

A

SHERIDAN AND KING

Real shocks on puppies; 54% of men and 100% of women delivered what they thought was the fatal shock.

GAME OF DEATH

  • Reality show replication where 80% ppts delivered max. shock to ‘unconscious’ man in front of live audience. - Similar levels of discomfort to Milgram ppts.

HOFLING

21/22 nurses obeyed unjustified orders from unknown doctor over phone to administer unknown drug.

MIRANDA

Found 90% obedience in Spanish students.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Milgram against

A

RANK AND JACOBSON

Known doctor asked nurses to administer Valium and were allowed to discuss. Only 2/18 obeyed.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Milgram variations (obedience)

A

MILGRAM

  1. Proximity
    - 40% in same room.
    - 30% forcing learners hand.
    - 20.5% instructions over phone + ppts pretended to give shocks/gave weaker ones.
  2. Location -
    - Dropped to 47.5% when in run-down office.
  3. Uniform -
    - Dropped to 20% when experimenter member of public in everyday clothes.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Uniform support

A

BICKMAN

  • 3 confederates in jacket and tie, milkman’s outfit or security guard’s uniform.
  • Asked passer-byers to do tasks such as picking up litter.
  • Twice as likely to obey instructions from security guard than jacket and tie.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Legitimacy of authority support

A

BLASS AND SCHMITT

Showed Milgram to students and found blamed experimenter for harm; experimenter had legitimate authority and ppt in agentic state.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

KEY STUDY: Adorno (authoritarian personality)

A

ADORNO

Procedure:

  • 2000 American men
  • Developed scales such as potential for fascism scale (F-scale).
  • Looked for causes of obedience and attitudes towards other racial groups.

Findings:

  • Authoritarians (scored highly on F-scale):
    1. Identify with the strong and are contemptuous of the weak.
    2. Conscious of social statuses and have excessive effect for authority.
    3. Fixed cognitive style: distinctive stereotypes and highly prejudice.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Authoritarian personality support

A

MILGRAM

interviewed ppts and found correlation between obedience and score on F-scale.

17
Q

Social support decreases conformity support

A

ASCH

Conformity dropped by 1/4 in presence of dissenter.

In another variation dissenter wore thick glasses + said trouble with vision; conformity still decreased.

18
Q

Social support decreases obedience support

A

GAMSON

Milgram replication in groups; 29/33 disobeyed.

19
Q

LOC support

A

HOLLAND

Milgram replication + measured LOC of ppts.

  • 37% internals didn’t continue to highest shock.
  • 23% externals didn’t continue to highest shock.
  • Explains resistance to obedience.
20
Q

LOC against

A

TWENGE

Analysed data from American LOC studies over 40 year period and found society becoming less obedient and more external; contradictory.

21
Q

Consistency in minority influence support

A

MOSCOVICI

Procedure:

  • 6 ppts viewed 36 blue slides and asked to state whether blue or green.
  • 2 confederates consistently said 2/3 slides green

Findings:

  • Ppts gave wrong answer 8% (control group 0.25%) of the time.
  • In another condition minority inconsistent and agreement fell to 1%.

WOOD

Meta-analysis of 100 similar studies and found consistent minorities had more influence.

22
Q

Flexibility in minority influence support

A

NEMETH

  • Groups of 1 confederate and 3 ppts negotiated compensation for someone in ski accident.
  • Confederate pushing for low sum.
  • Ppts agreed lower sum if confederate flexible.
23
Q

Deeper processing in minority influence support

A

MARTIN

  • Gave ppts supporting viewpoint from either minority or minority.
  • When exposed to contradictory view those who heard original from minority less willing to change views.
  • Internalisation occurred.
24
Q

NSI causing social change support

A

NOLAN

  • Hung messages on front doors of houses every week for a month.
  • In experimental group message said most residents trying to reduce energy usage.
  • In control group message asked to save energy.
  • Significant energy reduction in experimental group.