Forensics Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

Organised/disorganised AGAINST

A

CANTER

  • Used technique called ‘smallest space analysis’ on 100 USA murders using 39 characteristics of organised/disorganised offenders.
  • No evidence for distinct disorganised type.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Top-down approach SUPPORT

A

DOUGLAS

  • FBI review and created 192 profiles.
  • Only identified 15 suspects but focussed 77% of cases.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Investigative profiling SUPPORT

A

CANTER AND HERITAGE

  • Used ‘smallest space analysis’ to investigate 66 assault cases.
  • Correlations in patterns of behaviour e.g. impersonal language and lack of reaction.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Geographical profiling SUPPORT

A

LUNDRIGAN AND CANTER

  • Analysed information on 120 serial murder cases in USA.
  • Smallest space analysis found spatial consistency in location of body disposal; formed circle around base.
  • Pattern more noticeable in marauders.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Bottom-up approach SUPPORT/AGAINST

A

COPSON

  • Questionnaire to 34 police forces (81% return rate) on usefulness.
  • Only identified offender in 3% of cases but 83% found it useful.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

KEY STUDY: Lombroso

A

LOMBROSO

  • Examined facial and cranial characteristics of over 350 dead and 3500 live Italian convicts.
  • 40% crimes accounted for by people with atavistic characteristics.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Atavistic form AGAINST

A

KURTZBERG

  • Recidivism 42% after surgery and 70% without.
  • Treatment of those with atavistic characteristics cause of criminality?

GORING

  • Compared 3000 criminals with 3000 non-criminals,
  • No evidence that offenders have atavistic characteristics.
  • BUT found had lower than average intelligence.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Genetic explanations SUPPORT

A

LANGE (twin study)

  • 13 MZs and 17 DZs where 1 had served time in prison.
  • 10 MZs but 2 DZs both served time.

CROWE (adoption study)

  • Followed adopted children with criminal biological parent.
  • 50% chance of criminal record by age 18.
  • 5% for adoptees without criminal biological parent.

MEDNICK (adoption study)

  • Studied over 13,000 Danish adoptees.
  • 13.5% neither
  • 20% biological
  • 24.5% both.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Candidate genes SUPPORT

A

TIIHONEN

  • Genetic analysis of 900 offenders.
  • Abnormality on MAOA gene (related to serotonin and dopamine) associated with violent crime.
  • Those with a high risk combination x13 more likely to have a history of violent behaviour.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Eysenck’s theory SUPPORT

A

EYSENCK

  • Used Eysenck’s personality inventory to compare over 2000 prisoners with 2000 controls, subdivided into age groups.
  • All scored higher on extraverts, neuroticism and psychoticism.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Eysenck’s theory AGAINST

A

FARRINGTON

  • Review of several studies.
  • Criminals scored higher on psychoticism but not on neuroticism and extroversion.
  • Little difference in EEG measures of arousal between introverts and extraverts.

BARTOL AND HOLANCHOCK

  • Divided Hispanic and African-American prisoners into 6 groups based on criminal history.
  • All scored lower on extroversion than control.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Cognitive explanations SUPPORT

A

PALMER AND HOLLIIN

  • Compared moral reasoning of 210 female and 122 male non-offenders with 126 convicted offenders.
  • Used SMR-SF containing 11 dilemmas (stealing, promises).
  • Criminal group lower moral reasoning.
  • Possibly due to lack of role playing in childhood.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Differential association theory SUPPORT

A

FARRINGTON

  • Longitudinal study of 411 working class, deprived participants.
  • Risk factors included family criminality (41% convicted).

MEDNICK

  • Those with criminal adoptive parent more likely to have criminal records than those without.
  • 14.7% vs 13.5%.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Maternal deprivation theory SUPPORT

A

BOWLBY

  • Interviews with 44 juvenile thieves and their familes.
  • 14 affectionless psychopaths, 30 not.
  • Of the 14 APs, 12 experienced deprivation.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Maternal deprivation theory AGAINST

A

LEWIS

  • Interviews with 500 young criminals.
  • Deprivation a poor predictor for criminality.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Institutionalisation SUPPORT

A

MALOT AND FROMADER

  • Survey of 102 Australian released offenders.
  • Felt unsupported outside prison and that access to services would help.
17
Q

Psychological effects SUPPORT

A

ZIMBARDO

LIEM AND KUNST

  • Interviews with 25 lifers and identified post-incarceration syndrome.
  • Involves PTSD, institutionalisation, alienation.
18
Q

Token economies SUPPORT

A

HOBBS AND HOLT

  • Introduced token economy programme across 3 behavioural units (4th control).
  • Significant difference in behaviour compared to control.
19
Q

Anger management SUPPORT

A

KEEN

  • Studied progress of young people in programme developed by prison service.
  • 8 2 hour sessions, first 7 over 3 weeks and last a month later.
  • Initial issues: didn’t take seriously, forgot diary.
  • Positive outcome overall.
20
Q

Anger management AGAINST

A

BLACKBURN

  • Effective in prison but little impact long-term.
21
Q

Restorative justice SUPPORT

A

SHAPLAND

  • Government funded £7m research.
  • Prisoners randomly allocated to restorative justice or release after term.
  • Recidivism decreased by 14%.
  • Victim satisfied 85% of the time.

SHERMAN AND STRONG

  • Compared 36 studies of restorative justice with conventional justice programmes.
  • Recidivism dramatically reduced for violent and property crimes.
  • PTSD in victims significantly reduced.
  • All involved more satisfied.