Attachment Flashcards

You may prefer our related Brainscape-certified flashcards:
1
Q

Interactional synchrony support

A

ISABELLA

  • Assessed 30 mothers and infants for interactional synchrony and quality of attachment.
  • Correlation found.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Role of the father

A

SCHAFFER AND EMMERSON

  • Most formed specific attachment at 7 months and multiple attachments soon after.
  • 75% formed attachment to father by 18 months (protested when walked away).

GROSSMAN

  • Longitudinal study looking at relationship between parent’s behaviour and quality of attachment.
  • Quality of attachment to mothers important in adolescent attachment.
  • Quality of father’s play important in adolescent attachment.

FIELD

  • Filmed 4-month-old babies with primary care giver mothers or fathers and secondary caregiver fathers.
  • Primary care giver fathers spent more time smiling, imitating and holding.
  • Level of responsiveness not gender determining attachment.

FREEMAN AND ALMOND

  • Study of 1012 young adults’ perception of fathers as attachment figures.
  • Ranked level of support received and sought from different people and provided information on commitment, intimacy and advice.
  • 10% considered fathers a principal source of attachment support.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Role of the father explanation

A

OFFICE FOR NATIONAL STATISTICS (2014)

  • Of families with one parent working it was the father 87% of the time.
  • Of families with both parents working, 54% mother part time and 12% father part time.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

KEY STUDY: Schaffer stages of attachment

A

SCHAFFER AND EMERSON

Procedure:

  • Longitudinal study of 60 babies from skilled working class families in Glasgow.
  • Visited every month for the first year and at 18 months.
  • Interviewed mother on separation anxiety (rated distress on 3-point scale) and structured observation of stranger anxiety.

Findings:

  • 50% separation anxiety from specific attachment between 25 and 32 weeks.
  • 80% specific attachment by 40 weeks.
  • 30% multiple attachments by 40 weeks.
  • Specific attachment to adult most interactive and sensitive to signals.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

KEY STUDY: Lorenz (animal studies)

A

LORENZ

Procedure:

  • Clutch of goose eggs randomly divided
  • Half hatched with mother and half in incubator, where Lorenz was first moving object saw.

Findings:

  • Incubator group followed Lorenz, control group followed mother.
  • Continued when groups mixed.
  • Critical period where imprinting must takes place (few hours in some species).
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Imprinting against

A

GUITON

  • Imprinted chicks to yellow washing up gloves.
  • Learned to prefer mating with chickens.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

KEY STUDY: Harlow (animal studies)

A

HARLOW

Procedure:

  • Tested importance of contact comfort in development.
  • Variety of conditions, some with cloth or wire mother, some with both and some with neither.
  • KEY: 16 monkeys reared with 1 wire mother and 1 cloth mother.
  • In first condition milk dispensed by wire mother and in other by cloth mother.

Findings:

  • Sought comfort from cloth mother when frightened; contact comfort more important than food.
  • Clung to cloth mother not dispensing milk for 23.5/24 hours, even when spike.
  • Monkeys developed abnormal social behaviour (especially those with only wire mother): more aggressive, unskilled at mating, neglected/attacked young.
  • Critical attachment period of 90 days or damage from deprivation inevitable.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Learning theory against

A

LORENZ

Geese imprinted before feeding and maintained attachment regardless.

HARLOW

Preferred cloth mother even when wire mother providing food.

SCHAFFER AND EMERSON

Primary attachment to those most responsive not feeder.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Monotropy support

A

SCHAFFER AND EMERSON

80% had specific attachment by 40 weeks.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Monotropy against

A

SCHAFFER AND EMERSON

Some babies formed multiple attachments at the same time.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Internal working model support

A

BAILEY

  • 99 mother with 1yo babies.
  • Assessed attachment quality of baby and that of its mother to her own mother using interviews and observations.
  • Poor attachment with own mother meant more likely with child.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Social releasers support

A

BRAZELTON

  • Still faced experiment
  • When mother stopped responding babies used all tools: smiling, cooing, crying and eventually lie motionless.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

KEY STUDY: Ainsworth’s strange situation (attachment types)

A

AINSWORTH

Procedure:

  • Controlled lab experiment.
  • Covert observation through two-way mirror.
  • 100 middle class American’s and their children
  • Attachment assessed using 5 behaviours.
  • 7 3 minute stages after child and caregiver enter playroom.
    1. Encouraged to explore; secure base + proximity seeking.
    2. Stranger enters and interacts: stranger anxiety.
    3. Care giver leaves with stranger: stranger anxiety + separation anxiety.
    4. Care giver returns and stranger leaves: reunion + secure base.
    5. Care giver leaves child alone: separation anxiety.
    6. Stranger returns: stranger anxiety.
    7. Care giver returns: reunion.

Findings:

  • Developed 3 attachment types from patterns of behaviour.
  • Interviews determined sensitivity determines attachment type.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Ainsworth support

A

BICK

94% agreement between observers on attachment type.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

KEY STUDY: Ijzendoorn (cultural variations)

A

IJZENDOORN

Procedure:

  • Weighted meta-analysis comparing attachment types within and between cultures.
  • 43 strange situation replications in 8 (18 in USA and collectivist cultures underrepresented) countries of 1,990 children.

Findings:

  • Secure most common in all countries (varied from 75% in Britain to 50% in China).
  • All countries had children rated as A, B and C.
  • Insecure-resistant rarest overall, except in Japan and Israel.
  • Insecure avoidant most common in Germany and least common in Japan.
  • Variation 150% greater within cultures than between them (46%-90% secure in USA).
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Other studies: Simonella (Italy)

A

SIMONELLA

  • 76 12-month-olds.
  • 50% secure and 36% insecure avoidant.
  • Mother working increasingly long hours.
17
Q

Other studies: Jin (Korea)

A

JIN

  • Secure most common.
  • Insecure resistant more common than insecure avoidant (similar to Japan).
18
Q

Maternal deprivation support

A

BOWLBY

Procedure:

  • 44 teens accused of stealing
  • Interviewed for affectionless psychopathy (lack of affection, guilt and empathy).
  • Families interviewed to determine if deprived.
  • Control group of emotionally disturbed non-thieves to assess how often maternal deprivation occurs in non-thieves.

Findings:

  • 14/44 thieves psychopaths and of these 12 experienced maternal deprivation in first 2 years.
  • Only 2/44 in control group experienced maternal deprivation.
19
Q

Maternal deprivation against

A

LEWIS

  • Repeated thieves study with 500 teens.
  • Maternal deprivation didn’t lead to affectionless psychopathy or difficulty causing relationships.
20
Q

Maternal deprivation support

A

GOLDFORB

Procedure:

  • Effect of maternal deprivation on intellectual development.
  • 30 children orphaned (WW2), half fostered by 4 months and half in orphanage.

Findings:
- IQ assessed aged 12, fostered = 96 and orphanage = 68 (IDD).

LEVY

Separating baby rats from mother for as little as a day had permanent effects on social development.

21
Q

Critical period against

A

TWIN BOYS

  • Isolated in cupboard from 18 months to 7 years
  • Made full recovery after proper care.
  • Sensitive not critical period + effects of deprivation not permanent.
22
Q

KEY STUDY: Rutter’s English and Romanian Adoptee study (effects of institutionalisation)

A

RUTTER

Procedure:

  • 165 Romanian orphans adopted in Britain.
  • Physical, cognitive and emotional development assessed at 4, 6, 11 and 15 years,
  • Control group of 52 adopted British children.

Findings:

  • Adopted before 6 months IQ at 11 102.
  • Adopted between 6 months and 2 years IQ at 11 86.
  • Adopted after 2 years IQ at 11 77.
  • Differences remained aged 16.
  • After 6 moths displayed disinhibited attachment: attention seeking, clingy, indiscriminate social behaviour.
23
Q

KEY STUDY: The Bucharest Early Intervention Project (effects of institutionalisation)

A

ZEANAH

Procedure:

  • Assessed 95 children aged 12-31 months.
  • Spent an average of 90% of their lives in an institution.
  • Carers asked about signs of disinhibited attachment.
  • Control group of 50 children never institutionalised.

Findings:

  • 19% secure (74% in control group).
  • 65% disorganised.
  • 44% disinhibited (20% controlled).
24
Q

Internal working model support

A

BAILEY

  • 99 mother with 1yo babies.
  • Assessed attachment quality of baby and that of its mother to her own mother using interviews and observations.
  • Poor attachment with own mother meant more likely with child.

ZIMMERMAN

No relationship between infant and adolescent attachment types.

25
Q

Relationships in later childhood support

A

MYRON-WILSON AND SMITH

  • Assessed attachment type and bulling involvement in 196 children aged 7-11 from London.
  • Secure unlikely to be involved.
  • Insecure-avoidant most likely to be victims.
  • Insecure-resistant most likely to be bullies.
26
Q

Relationships in adulthood support

A

MCCCARTHY

  • 40 women assessed for attachment type as infants.
  • Secure had best, longest and easiest to establish romantic relationships and friendships.
  • Insecure-avoidant had problems with intimacy in romantic relationships
  • Insecure resistant had problems with maintaining friendships.

HAZAN AND SHAVER

Procedure:

  • 620 replies to ‘love quiz’ (newspapers) analysed.
  • Assessed current most important relationship, general love experiences and attachment type.

Findings:

  • Secure most likely to have good and long-lasting relationships.
  • Insecure-resistant most likely to be jealous and fear intimacy.

FRALEY

  • Meta-analysis of 27 longitudinal strange situation studies (all test-retest data).
  • Moderate positive correlation between security of infant attachment and in later life: 0.39.
27
Q

Relationships as parents support

A

BAILEY

  • 99 mother with 1yo babies.
  • Assessed attachment quality of baby and that of its mother to her own mother using interviews and observations.
  • Poor attachment with own mother meant more likely with child.

HARLOW

Deprived monkeys attacked and occasionally killed their young.