Attachment Flashcards
Interactional synchrony support
ISABELLA
- Assessed 30 mothers and infants for interactional synchrony and quality of attachment.
- Correlation found.
Role of the father
SCHAFFER AND EMMERSON
- Most formed specific attachment at 7 months and multiple attachments soon after.
- 75% formed attachment to father by 18 months (protested when walked away).
GROSSMAN
- Longitudinal study looking at relationship between parent’s behaviour and quality of attachment.
- Quality of attachment to mothers important in adolescent attachment.
- Quality of father’s play important in adolescent attachment.
FIELD
- Filmed 4-month-old babies with primary care giver mothers or fathers and secondary caregiver fathers.
- Primary care giver fathers spent more time smiling, imitating and holding.
- Level of responsiveness not gender determining attachment.
FREEMAN AND ALMOND
- Study of 1012 young adults’ perception of fathers as attachment figures.
- Ranked level of support received and sought from different people and provided information on commitment, intimacy and advice.
- 10% considered fathers a principal source of attachment support.
Role of the father explanation
OFFICE FOR NATIONAL STATISTICS (2014)
- Of families with one parent working it was the father 87% of the time.
- Of families with both parents working, 54% mother part time and 12% father part time.
KEY STUDY: Schaffer stages of attachment
SCHAFFER AND EMERSON
Procedure:
- Longitudinal study of 60 babies from skilled working class families in Glasgow.
- Visited every month for the first year and at 18 months.
- Interviewed mother on separation anxiety (rated distress on 3-point scale) and structured observation of stranger anxiety.
Findings:
- 50% separation anxiety from specific attachment between 25 and 32 weeks.
- 80% specific attachment by 40 weeks.
- 30% multiple attachments by 40 weeks.
- Specific attachment to adult most interactive and sensitive to signals.
KEY STUDY: Lorenz (animal studies)
LORENZ
Procedure:
- Clutch of goose eggs randomly divided
- Half hatched with mother and half in incubator, where Lorenz was first moving object saw.
Findings:
- Incubator group followed Lorenz, control group followed mother.
- Continued when groups mixed.
- Critical period where imprinting must takes place (few hours in some species).
Imprinting against
GUITON
- Imprinted chicks to yellow washing up gloves.
- Learned to prefer mating with chickens.
KEY STUDY: Harlow (animal studies)
HARLOW
Procedure:
- Tested importance of contact comfort in development.
- Variety of conditions, some with cloth or wire mother, some with both and some with neither.
- KEY: 16 monkeys reared with 1 wire mother and 1 cloth mother.
- In first condition milk dispensed by wire mother and in other by cloth mother.
Findings:
- Sought comfort from cloth mother when frightened; contact comfort more important than food.
- Clung to cloth mother not dispensing milk for 23.5/24 hours, even when spike.
- Monkeys developed abnormal social behaviour (especially those with only wire mother): more aggressive, unskilled at mating, neglected/attacked young.
- Critical attachment period of 90 days or damage from deprivation inevitable.
Learning theory against
LORENZ
Geese imprinted before feeding and maintained attachment regardless.
HARLOW
Preferred cloth mother even when wire mother providing food.
SCHAFFER AND EMERSON
Primary attachment to those most responsive not feeder.
Monotropy support
SCHAFFER AND EMERSON
80% had specific attachment by 40 weeks.
Monotropy against
SCHAFFER AND EMERSON
Some babies formed multiple attachments at the same time.
Internal working model support
BAILEY
- 99 mother with 1yo babies.
- Assessed attachment quality of baby and that of its mother to her own mother using interviews and observations.
- Poor attachment with own mother meant more likely with child.
Social releasers support
BRAZELTON
- Still faced experiment
- When mother stopped responding babies used all tools: smiling, cooing, crying and eventually lie motionless.
KEY STUDY: Ainsworth’s strange situation (attachment types)
AINSWORTH
Procedure:
- Controlled lab experiment.
- Covert observation through two-way mirror.
- 100 middle class American’s and their children
- Attachment assessed using 5 behaviours.
- 7 3 minute stages after child and caregiver enter playroom.
1. Encouraged to explore; secure base + proximity seeking.
2. Stranger enters and interacts: stranger anxiety.
3. Care giver leaves with stranger: stranger anxiety + separation anxiety.
4. Care giver returns and stranger leaves: reunion + secure base.
5. Care giver leaves child alone: separation anxiety.
6. Stranger returns: stranger anxiety.
7. Care giver returns: reunion.
Findings:
- Developed 3 attachment types from patterns of behaviour.
- Interviews determined sensitivity determines attachment type.
Ainsworth support
BICK
94% agreement between observers on attachment type.
KEY STUDY: Ijzendoorn (cultural variations)
IJZENDOORN
Procedure:
- Weighted meta-analysis comparing attachment types within and between cultures.
- 43 strange situation replications in 8 (18 in USA and collectivist cultures underrepresented) countries of 1,990 children.
Findings:
- Secure most common in all countries (varied from 75% in Britain to 50% in China).
- All countries had children rated as A, B and C.
- Insecure-resistant rarest overall, except in Japan and Israel.
- Insecure avoidant most common in Germany and least common in Japan.
- Variation 150% greater within cultures than between them (46%-90% secure in USA).