soci 327 final Flashcards
Define rule of law
the principle that the law is supreme over any individual or body of government
Who was credited with establishing a more uniform or common approach to justice? When?
King Henry II in 1154
Define common law
an approach to law that is based on tradition, where judges follow decisions or precedents made by other courts
Define precedent
the practice of judges basing decisions about current cases on the outcomes of prior judgements.
Define Magna Carta
written in 1215, established that everybody, even the king, was subject to the law and that all free men had the right to justice and fair trials
Define stare decisis
a legal principle whereby courts are bound by their prior decisions and the decisions of higher courts.
What are the 3 key elements of the Canadian justice system?
presumption of innocence, the burden of proof, proof is beyond a reasonable doubt
Define substantive law
Refers to the rules that define rights and obligations
Define procedural law
focuses on the rules that determine the enforcement of rights or due process
inadequately funded legal aid systems result in:
slower court processes, job losses when suspects are unnecessarily incarcerated, further marginalization of people who cannot fully participate in society
what does section 11 of the charter of rights and freedoms mention
a reasonable time to bring a case to trial
what is a “reasonable time” to bring the case of a serious crime to trial?
30 months from the time the individual is charged until the conclusion of the trial.
what is a “reasonable time” to bring the case of a less serious crime to trial?
18 months
what does section 10 of the charter mention?
everyone has the right on arrest or detention:
a) To be informed promptly of the reasons therefor;
b) To retain and instruct counsel without delay and to be informed of the right; and
c) To have the validity of the detention determined by way of habeas corpus and to be released if the detention is not lawful.
define fundamental justice
a principle of Canadian justice that states that people who acted reasonably may not be punished unless there is proof that they did something wrong.
define habeas corpus
the right of a person who is being detained to challenge the legality of his or her detention before a court.
define a crime of omission
an act where the accused has failed to take some action, such as a school social worker failing to report child abuse to child welfare authorities.
define a crime of commission
a criminal act that was actually carried out.
what are the two main elements of a crime that have to occur together?
actus reus and mens rea
define actus reus
The criminal action or conduct of a person committing an offence.
define mens rea
The state of mind of a person committing a criminal act. must establish that the accused did something that he knew was wrong and that the accused intended to commit the crime
define negligence
an act that shows disregard for the wellbeing of others
define reckless behaviours
occur when people act in a manner that they know is dangerous or risky
define willful blindness
occurs when an accused is aware that a crime was likely being committed but chose to ignore the facts
what was the issue in R v Askov? what happened?
trial within a reasonable time, didn’t get charged because it took so long
what was the issue in R v Ewanchuk? what happened?
there is no defence for implied sexual consent. she stopped saying no so he thought it was implied consent but supreme court held that no means no
what was the issue in R v Feeney? what happened?
unreasonable search and seizure. Found evidence that proved second degree murder but he wasnt charged because they didnt have a warrant.
what was the issue in R v Mann? what happened?
police powers when detaining a person as part of an investigation, illegally searched the suspect and found something but charges were dropped because the police didnt have the right to search beyond a pat down.
what was the issue in R v martineau? what happened?
mens rea requirement for murder, adult + 15 y/o, adult killed someone but 15 y/o was also charged, but it was overturned because the youth didnt know it would be violent
what was the issue in R v seaboyer? what happened?
evidence relating to the sexual reputation, seaboyer was not allowed to question the woman he was accused of assaulting about her prior sexual conduct
what was the issue in R v stinchcombe? what happened?
crown duty to disclose evidence to the defence, lawyer was being tried and requested access to all info collected by the crown but the supreme court said no you have to give all the info
define alibi defences
witnesses or other forms of evidence that show that the defendant could not have committed the offence.
what are the two things that alibi defences must be?
adequate and timely
define justification defences
used when the accused admits to committing an offence, but the act was justified under the circumstances
consent justification
A defence that is almost always used by defendants accused of assault, where they contend that the victim was a willing party in the offence
duress justification
the accused people claim that their actions were not voluntary but acts in response to threats from another person
define battered woman defence
a defence that has been used by some victims of domestic violence who argued they had no way of escaping their victimization and had no other choice but to attack their abuser
define entrapment justification
Occurs when police or government officials persuade or lure an individual into carrying out an offence that he or she would not otherwise have committed
when can entrapment defence be made?
after the accused is found guilty
define necessity defence
A type of defence claiming that an illegal act was committed in order to prevent a more serious harm, they had “no choice”
define provocation defence
A defence based on an accused claiming that they were provoked into committing a crime
when can the provocation defence be used?
only to argue that an act of murder be reduced to manslaughter
define stand your ground laws
in the USA, gives people the right to protect their lives and property by using force that would be considered excessive in Canada
define excuse defences
people can claim that their illegal behaviour can be excused based on the defence that they could not form the intent to commit an offence
age defence
A defence that considers immaturity and recognizes that youth under 12 years of age cannot be held criminally responsible
define automatism
An involuntary act where an individual is in a state of impaired consciousness and lacks the intent to commit a crime
what are the two types of mistake defences?
mistake of law and mistake of fact
define mistake of law
When the accused person claims they did not realize they had committed an illegal act
define mistake of fact
When the accused person was aware of the law but honestly believed that the act they committed did not break it
what % of hate crimes are based on race/ethnicity?
43%
what % of hate crimes are based on religion?
41%
what % of hate crimes are based on sexual orientation?
10%
what % of hate crimes are non-violent?
66%
define the open court principle
gives the media the freedom to publicize court proceedings, although some info may be subject to a publication ban
define publication bans
made by courts in order to protect the identity of some victims or specific info about cases
what is the intent of the courts?
to help people resolve disputes fairly- whether they are between individuals, or between individuals and the state
what are the 4 levels of criminal court?
provincial and territorial courts, provincial and territorial superior courts, provincial and territorial courts of appeal, and supreme court of canada
what court do offenders make their first appearance at?
provincial and territorial courts
what court are most cases resolved at?
provincial and territorial courts
what do the provincial and territorial superior courts hear?
family law cases and serious criminal matters
what court level can dismiss the appeal or order a new trial if the court finds that there were serious errors or increase/lower sentences
provincial and territorial courts of appeal
how many applications are sent to the supreme court per year?
460
how many cases does the supreme court hear per year?
56 or 65-80???
what do the police do next if they proceed with laying a charge?
they deliver a package of info to the Crown prosecutor that contains all of the materials relevant to the case