mktg 465 final 04S measurement Flashcards

1
Q

what kind of scale has no obvious relation between the quantity of the construct being measured and the numerical value assigned to it?

A

nominal

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

implying that the numbers assigned to objects are classifying them but have no true numeric meaning

A

nominal “namesake”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

what kind of scale can order the data but the numbers do not imply absolute quantities or equal intervals?

A

ordinal scale

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

what kind of scale has equal intervals between points to show relative change and the intervals have meaning?

A

interval scale

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

what kind of scale has a meaningful zero point so that magnitudes can be compared, and the zero value indicates absence of a construct?

A

ratio scale

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

what are the 4 steps to measure marketing constructs?

A

specify construct domain, generate a universe of statements describing the construct, establish measurement criteria, assess accuracy and stability of the construct measures.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

state the central idea of concept under study

A

specify construct domain

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

the observable characteristics to be measured, make a list.

A

generate a universe of statements describing the construct

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

process for assigning value to the construct

A

establish measurement criteria

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

what type of rating requires a categorical response anchored by polar opposite descriptives?

A

descriptive rating

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

what type of rating requires a numerical response anchored by polar opposite descriptives?

A

numerical rating

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

the degree to which a measure appears to assess what it is supposed to assess, a judgement call of the researcher

A

face validity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

a matter of judgement supported by academic literature, previous studies

A

content validity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

what are the 2 dimensions of reliability?

A

repeatability and internal consistency

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

consistency within/between groups of questions comprising the scale

A

internal consistency

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

replication to determine similarity between two separate administrations of the scale

A

repeatability

17
Q

the ability of the same instrument to produce consistent results when used a second time under identical conditions

A

test-retest

18
Q

ability to produce similar results using different samples

A

equivalent sample

19
Q

what are the 2 measures of repeatability?

A

test re-test, equivalent sample

20
Q

what are the 2 measures of internal consistency

A

split-half technique and equivalent form

21
Q

the ability to produce similar results using two instruments as similar as possible to measure the same object

A

equivalent form

22
Q

dividing into two the total set of measurement items and correlating the results

A

split-half technique

23
Q

what measures internal consistency and is the mean correlation of all possible ways of splitting a set of items in half?

A

coefficient alpha

24
Q

at what level is cronbach’s alpha or coefficient alpha reliable?

A

over 0.6