Short & Happy Guide Chapter 10: Privileges Flashcards

1
Q

__________ provide the legal right to refuse to testify on certain matters or, to prevent someone else from testifying on certain matters.

A

Privileges

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

The privileges also apply to documents as well. These are generally referred to as ________ ________.

A

Testimonial Privileges

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

There are many kinds of ________ _______. Some are recognized at the federal level, some at the state level, and some at both.

A

Testimonial privileges

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

In _______ cases, state law governs these privileges while federal law governs privileges in cases where jurisdiction is based on ________ _______.

A

Diversity

Federal question

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

The FRE do not specifically set forth independent privileges, but they do contain rules that relate to, and recognize, certain privileges. True or False.

A

True

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Privilege in General.

What FRE?

A

501

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

________ may arise at the federal and state levels.

A

Privileges

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

At the ________ level, privileges are created by common law, federal statute, or the Constitution, which is recognized by FRE 501.

A

Federal level

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

At the state level, rules are usually created by the State’s Supreme Court.

What does this refer to?

A

Privileges

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

__________ are held by the individuals to whom they apply.

A

Privileges

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Privileges are held by the ________ to whom they apply.

A

Individuals

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Privileges are held by the individuals to whom they apply. It means that, for example, with the attorney-client privilege, the privilege belongs to the ______, not the _______.

A

Client

Attorney

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Privileges are held by the individuals to whom they apply. It means that, for example, with the attorney-client privilege, the privilege belongs to the client, not the attorney. This means that the client is the one who holds the ________ and may assert the _______.

A

Privilege

Privilege

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Assume that a client is discussing his case with his attorney. The client admits that he robbed the convenience store. The client “______” the privilege. This means that the attorney cannot reveal this information unless permitted by the client. It’s the client’s privilege. The attorney must, absent client consent, take the information to his grave. Of course there are exceptions to this too. But you will learn more about that in your professional responsibility course.

A

Owns

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

For the privilege to apply, the ________ must be made in _________.

A

Communications

Confidence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

For the privilege to apply, the communications must be made in confidence. If you tell your lawyer, across a crowded restaurant, that you robbed the convenience store then there is no _________.

Some states recognize a _______ _______ that communications made in certain relationships are made in confidence. But- shouting across a crowded room would easily rebut the presumption of confidentiality.

A

Privilege

Rebuttable presumption

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Neither the lawyers nor the judge may ______ on the fact that a person exercised his or her privilege. For instance, in the presence of a jury, commenting on a person’s choosing not to testify so as not to possibly incriminate herself (5th Amendment) _________ constitute reversible error.

A

Comment

MAY

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

________ may be waived — intentionally or otherwise.

A

Privileges

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Privileges may be waived - intentionally or otherwise. Here are ways in which someone may waive a privilege.
1. ?
2.
3.
4.

A
  1. Failure to Claim a Privilege
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Privileges may be waived - intentionally or otherwise. Here are ways in which someone may waive a privilege.
1.
2. ?
3.
4.

A
  1. Intentional Waiver
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

Privileges may be waived - intentionally or otherwise. Here are ways in which someone may waive a privilege.
1.
2.
3. ?
4.

A
  1. Written Agreement
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

Privileges may be waived - intentionally or otherwise. Here are ways in which someone may waive a privilege.
1.
2.
3.
4. ?

A
  1. Carelessness
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

Ways in which someone may waive a privilege:

___________ to _______ a __________: When evidence which would otherwise be protected by the privilege is offered into evidence and no objection is made then the privilege is waived.

A

Failure to Claim a Privilege

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

Ways in which someone may waive a privilege:
Failure to Claim a Privilege: When evidence which would otherwise be protected by the privilege, is offered into evidence and no ________ is made then the privilege is _________.

A

Objection

Waived

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Q

Ways in which someone may waive a privilege:
_______ _______: Recall that the privilege is owned by the person to whom it applies. That person (i.e., the client) may waive the privilege. It belongs to the client to do with as she desires; therefore, she can waive it if she wants to.

A

Intentional Waiver

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
26
Q

Ways in which someone may waive a privilege:
Intentional Waiver: Recall that the privilege is owned by the person to whom it applies. That person (i.e., the client) may waive the privilege. It belongs to the client to do with as she desires; therefore, she can ______ it if she wants to.

A

Waive

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
27
Q

Ways in which someone may waive a privilege:
_______ _______: A person may waive her privilege, in advance, in writing.

A

Written Agreement

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
28
Q

Ways in which someone may waive a privilege:
Written Agreement: A person may waive her privilege, in advance, in ________.

A

Writing

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
29
Q

A party may inadvertently waive a privilege if the party is _________.

A

Careless

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
30
Q

A party may inadvertently waive a privilege if the party is careless. For example, in one case, a party did not take precautions to make sure that the documents he gave to his lawyer remained ________. Some of the papers were co-mingled with other documents that could be reviewed by a third-party. In that case, the court found that “if a client wishes to preserve the attorney- client privilege he must take some affirmative action to preserve __________.”

A

Confidential
Confidentiality

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
31
Q

What if someone overheard a communication that would, otherwise, be privileged? This is similar to the carelessness waiver previously discussed. If someone overhears information that would otherwise be privileged, the ________ __________ become the critical question.

A

Surrounding circumstances

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
32
Q

What if someone overheard a communication that would, otherwise, be privileged? This is similar to the carelessness waiver previously discussed. If someone overhears information that would otherwise be privileged, the surrounding circumstances become the critical question.

If the lawyer and the client (for example) take appropriate precautions to maintain _________, then the privilege would hold, and the client can prevent the person who heard the information from revealing it. On the other hand, if the conversation takes place at lunch in a crowded restaurant, then the privilege would likely be waived.

A

Confidentiality

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
33
Q

Commonly Recognized Privileges:
1. ?
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.

A
  1. Accountant- Client
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
34
Q

Commonly Recognized Privileges:
1.
2. ?
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.

A
  1. Attorney- Client
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
35
Q

Commonly Recognized Privileges:
1.
2.
3. ?
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.

A
  1. Attorney- Work Product
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
36
Q

Commonly Recognized Privileges:
1.
2.
3.
4. ?
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.

A
  1. Clergy-Penitent
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
37
Q

Commonly Recognized Privileges:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5. ?
6.
7.
8.
9.

A
  1. Journalist
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
38
Q

Commonly Recognized Privileges:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6. ?
7.
8.
9.

A
  1. Physician- Patient
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
39
Q

Commonly Recognized Privileges:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7. ?
8.
9.

A
  1. Psychotherapist/ Social Worker
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
40
Q

Commonly Recognized Privileges:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8. ?
9.

A
  1. Self-Incrimination
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
41
Q

Commonly Recognized Privileges:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9. ?

A
  1. Spousal Privileges
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
42
Q

In diversity cases, state law governs privileges, in federal question cases, federal law governs.
1. Accountant- Client

Federal Common Law:
State Law:

A

Federal Common Law: Privilege NOT recognized
State Law: Privilege Usually Recognized

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
43
Q

In diversity cases, state law governs privileges, in federal question cases, federal law governs.
2. Attorney- Client

Federal Common Law:
State Law:

A

Federal Common Law: Privilege Recognized
State Law: Privilege Usually Recognized

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
44
Q

This privilege is the most common, most heavily used, most well-recognized (next to the 5th Amendment privilege) and certainly one of the most often tested.

A
  1. Attorney- Client.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
45
Q

There are certain requirements which, if met, permit the client to exercise the privilege. The United States Supreme Court has recognized the privilege, and, in fact, describes it as “the oldest of the privileges for confidential communications known to the common law.”

A
  1. Attorney- Client
46
Q

The Supreme Court has not given us precise elements as to what is protected by the Attorney- Client privilege. However, many state courts have required these elements for the privilege to apply:
1. ?
2.
3.
4.

A
  1. Legal advice of any kind is sought
47
Q

The Supreme Court has not given us precise elements as to what is protected by the Attorney- Client privilege. However, many state courts have required these elements for the privilege to apply:
1.
2. ?
3.
4.

A
  1. From a legal professional in his or her capacity as such
48
Q

The Supreme Court has not given us precise elements as to what is protected by the Attorney- Client privilege. However, many state courts have required these elements for the privilege to apply:
1.
2.
3. ?
4.

A
  1. The communication relates to that purpose; and
49
Q

The Supreme Court has not given us precise elements as to what is protected by the Attorney- Client privilege. However, many state courts have required these elements for the privilege to apply:
1.
2.
3.
4. ?

A
  1. The communication is made in confidence
50
Q

This element might seem pretty simple. Usually, it is. You might think that the typical scenario is a client seeking advice from his lawyer in the lawyer’s office. However, legal advice can be sought under many different circumstances.

It could happen anywhere - even a bar.

But if you examine the fourth element the communication must be made in confidence the environment of the bar may undermine or destroy that element.

What does this refer to?

A
  1. Attorney- Client Privilege

Element 1:
Legal Advice of Any Kind is Sought

51
Q

The privilege is limited to situations in which the attorney is acting as a legal advisor.

Business advice does not count, and is not protected. That is, giving business advice is not acting in the capacity of a legal professional.

What does this refer to?

A
  1. Attorney- Client Privilege

Element 2:
From a Legal Professional in His or Her Capacity

52
Q

If you are discussing sports scores with your lawyer, then this communication is not protected.

What does this refer to?

A
  1. Attorney- Client Privilege

Element 2:
From a Legal Professional in His or Her Capacity

53
Q

A communication between lawyer and client can consist of many kinds; those related to the client’s seeking of legal advice will be ________; those unrelated will not be __________.

A

protected

protected

54
Q

In the reference above, the attorney must be acting in his or her capacity as a legal professional. Here, the communication must relate to the purpose of seeking legal advice.

Sports statistics? Not so much; unless you are a sports agent, the scores are your client’s, and you are speaking to your client about his upcoming contract.

What does this refer to?

A
  1. Attorney- Client Privilege

Element 3: The communication Relates to that Purpose

55
Q

The Communication must be made in confidence. Although not usually a problem, certain situations can create problems with confidentiality. Consider the client who brings in his or her spouse for support. If the spouse is not a client also, then oops we might have a breach of confidence. If the communication occurs in a crowded restaurant again, we might have a problem.

What does this refer to?

A
  1. Attorney- Client Privilege

Element 4: The Communication is Made in Confidence

56
Q

What about personnel at law firms?

Communication to, or with, them does not breach the confidentiality requirement. Associates, para-professionals, and staff are all appropriate individuals to communicate with, and to be part of, any communication with clients. Without the protections extending to these individuals, the job of an attorney would be virtually impossible.

True or False.

A

True

57
Q

In diversity cases, state law governs privileges, in federal question cases, federal law governs.
3. Attorney- Work Product

Federal Common Law:
State Law:

A

Federal Common Law: Privilege Recognized

State Law: Privilege Usually Recognized

58
Q

For example, if he interviews a witness, the witness is not a client. Therefore, communication is not protected by the attorney- client privilege. However, the communication might be protected under the work product privilege because the attorney is performing work on behalf of her client.

What does this refer to?

A
  1. Attorney- Work Product
59
Q

The United States Supreme Court has told us that _____ ______ is not subject to discovery except in the very rare circumstance where it is a necessity and cannot otherwise be obtained by other means.

A

work product

60
Q

In diversity cases, state law governs privileges, in federal question cases, federal law governs.
4. Clergy- Penitent

Federal Common Law:
State Law:

A

Federal Common Law: Privilege Recognized

State Law: Privilege Usually Recognized

61
Q

American _____ _____ compels the recognition of a clergy-penitent privilege.

The privilege between clergy and penitent is rooted in the imperative need for confidence and trust.

The privilege recognizes the human need to disclose to a spiritual counselor, in total and absolute confidence, what are believed to be flawed acts or thoughts and to receive priestly consolation and guidance in return.

A

common law

62
Q
  1. Clergy- penitent
    For a communication to be protected, and for the privilege to apply:
    a. ?
    b.
    c.
A

a. The communication must be made with a reasonable expectation of confidentiality

63
Q
  1. Clergy- penitent
    For a communication to be protected, and for the privilege to apply:
    a.
    b. ?
    c.
A

b. The communication must be made to a member of the clergy; and

64
Q
  1. Clergy- penitent
    For a communication to be protected, and for the privilege to apply:
    a.
    b.
    c. ?
A

c. The clergy must have been acting in his or her professional or spiritual capacity.

65
Q

A ______ member is a minister, priest, rabbi, or other similar functionary of a religious organization, or an individual reasonably believed so to be by the person consulting him.

A

clergy

66
Q

The ________ may be claimed by the clergy member or by the penitent, the penitent’s guardian or conservator, or by the penitent’s personal representative if the penitent is deceased.

A

privilege

67
Q

The communication will be considered confidential if it was made privately, and if it was not ________ for further disclosure except to third-parties present in furtherance of, or essential to, the purpose of the communication.

In one case, a letter to a cleric was not subject to the privilege because there was no indication that it was _______ to be confidential, nor did the letter indicate that it was seeking religious counsel or spiritual advice, etc.

A

intended

intended

68
Q

The communication must be made in the clergy’s capacity as a _______ ______.

A

spiritual advisor

69
Q

Some examples of what NOT to do: A communication was made to a cleric (clergy) seeking help in avoiding taxes. This would not fall within the privilege. Yes, it really happened. In another case, a guy had an employee who happened to be a priest. His communications to his employee were not protected because the priest was not employed as a priest. !!

A

!!

70
Q

In diversity cases, state law governs privileges, in federal question cases, federal law governs.
5. Journalist

Federal Common Law:
State law:

A

Federal Common Law: Privilege Not Recognized

State Law: Privilege Usually Recognized

71
Q

At the federal level the Supreme Court has not recognized a privilege for a journalist’s sources. At the state level, some (but not all) jurisdictions have recognized a journalist’s privilege.

The privilege often has the following requirements:
a. ?
b.
c.

A

a. It may only be claimed by the journalist - not by another witness

72
Q

At the federal level the Supreme Court has not recognized a privilege for a journalist’s sources. At the state level, some (but not all) jurisdictions have recognized a journalist’s privilege.

The privilege often has the following requirements:
a.
b. ?
c.

A

b. The journalist need not be credentialed for an established press entity; and

73
Q

At the federal level the Supreme Court has not recognized a privilege for a journalist’s sources. At the state level, some (but not all) jurisdictions have recognized a journalist’s privilege.

The privilege often has the following requirements:
a.
b.
c. ?

A

c. The person acting as a journalist must have intended to gather the information for the purpose of dissemination and should independently seek the information (as opposed to serving or promoting the interests of another).

74
Q

Journalist: The Following Information is Protected By the Privilege
a. ?
b.

A

a. A journalist’s confidential sources

75
Q

Journalist: The Following Information is Protected By the Privilege
a.
b. ?

A

b. Potentially, a journalist’s non-confidential sources, depending on the circuit and the nature of the proceedings in which the privilege is invoked.

76
Q

Journalist: To assert the privilege:
a. ?
b.

A

a. The party claiming the privilege has the initial burden to prove that at the beginning of the investigation, she had intended to disseminate to the public the information obtained through the investigation; and

77
Q

Journalist: To assert the privilege:
a.
b. ?

A

b. The party claiming the privilege must do more than assert it; she must also provide the court with particularized allegations or facts that support the claim of privilege

78
Q

Journalist: To overcome the privilege:
a. ?
b.
(1)
(2)
(3)

A

a. A court must weigh the First Amendment concerns against the opposing need for disclosure in light of the facts of the case.

79
Q

Journalist: To overcome the privilege:
a.
b. ?
(1)
(2)
(3)

A

b. A three- part test for overcoming the privilege has been followed by many courts:

80
Q

Journalist: To overcome the privilege:
a.
b.
(1) ?
(2)
(3)

A

(1) Whether the information is relevant to the underlying cause of action

81
Q

Journalist: To overcome the privilege:
a.
b.
(1)
(2) ?
(3)

A

(2) Whether the information can be obtained by alternative means; and

82
Q

Journalist: To overcome the privilege:
a.
b.
(1)
(2)
(3) ?

A

(3) Whether there is a compelling interest in the information

83
Q

In diversity cases, state law governs privileges, in federal question cases, federal law governs.
6. Physician-patient

Federal Common Law:

State Law:

A

Federal Common Law: Privilege NOT recognized

State Law: Privilege Usually Recognized

84
Q

Although this privilege is not recognized by federal law, most state-court jurisdictions recognize some form of this privilege. The elements commonly used require the communication to be:
i. ?
ii.
iii.

Federal common law, however, protects a patient’s limited right to privacy regarding medical records.

A

i. Made to a medical professional (need not be an actual doctor)

85
Q

Although this privilege is not recognized by federal law, most state-court jurisdictions recognize some form of this privilege. The elements commonly used require the communication to be:
i.
ii. ?
iii.

Federal common law, however, protects a patient’s limited right to privacy regarding medical records.

A

ii. Acquired while attending to the patient; and

86
Q

Although this privilege is not recognized by federal law, most state-court jurisdictions recognize some form of this privilege. The elements commonly used require the communication to be:
i.
ii.
iii. ?

Federal common law, however, protects a patient’s limited right to privacy regarding medical records.

A

iii. Related to the treatment

87
Q

In diversity cases, state law governs privileges, in federal question cases, federal law governs.
7. Psychotherapist/ Social Worker

Federal Common Law:

State Law:

A

Federal Common Law: Privilege Recognized

State Law: Privilege Usually Recognized

88
Q
  1. Psychotherapist/ Social Worker: Individuals have limited rights to refuse to disclose, and to prevent another person from disclosing confidential communications made to a psychotherapist, or persons who are participating in the diagnosis or treatment under the direction of a psychotherapist, to diagnose or treat:
    i. ?
    ii.
    iii.
A

I. A mental condition;

89
Q
  1. Psychotherapist/ Social Worker: Individuals have limited rights to refuse to disclose, and to prevent another person from disclosing confidential communications made to a psychotherapist, or persons who are participating in the diagnosis or treatment under the direction of a psychotherapist, to diagnose or treat:
    i.
    ii. ?
    iii.
A

ii. An emotional condition

90
Q
  1. Psychotherapist/ Social Worker: Individuals have limited rights to refuse to disclose, and to prevent another person from disclosing confidential communications made to a psychotherapist, or persons who are participating in the diagnosis or treatment under the direction of a psychotherapist, to diagnose or treat:
    i.
    ii.
    iii. ?
A

iii. A drug addiction

91
Q

In diversity cases, state law governs privileges, in federal question cases, federal law governs.
8. Self-Incrimination (5th Amendment)

Federal Common Law:

State Law:

A

Federal Common Law: Privilege Recognized

State Law: Privilege Usually Recognized

92
Q

The privilege against _____ _______ is constitutional. Specifically, it is an absolute right provided by the 5th Amendment to the United States Constitution.

A

self- incrimination

93
Q

This means that a witness (any witness- not just a party) may refuse to answer any question which might elicit information that might subject him or her to criminal prosecution.

Additionally, a defendant in a criminal case may under this privilege refuse to take the stand at all and it cannot be legally held agains there for exercising this privilege.

What does this refer to?

A
  1. Self- Incrimination (5th Amendment)
94
Q

This privilege always applies. That is, it can be claimed in any federal or state proceeding whether criminal or civil.

A

Self- Incrimination (5th Amendment)

95
Q

Testimony is considered _______ wen answers would support a conviction under a criminal statute and embraces those which would furnish a link in the chain of evidence needed to prosecute the witness for a crime.

A

incriminating

96
Q

In diversity cases, state law governs privileges, in federal question cases, federal law governs.
9. Spousal Privileges

Federal Common Law:
State Law:

A

Federal Common Law: Privilege Recognized

State Law: Privilege Usually Recognized

97
Q

Under federal common law, two types of spousal privileges exist:
a. ?
b.

A

a. The marital confidential-communiations privilege; and

98
Q

Under federal common law, two types of spousal privileges exist:
a.
b. ?

A

b. The spousal testimonial privilege

99
Q

The Marital Confidential Communications Privilege:
a. Generally
(1) ?
(2)
(3)

A

(1) Protects confidential communications between spouses

100
Q

The Marital Confidential Communications Privilege:
a. Generally
(1)
(2) ?
(3)

A

(2) Is held by both spouses

101
Q

The Marital Confidential Communications Privilege:
a. Generally
(1)
(2)
(3) ?

A

(3) Applies in both civil and cirminal cases

102
Q

Both spouses jointly hold this privilege and either spouse may refuse to disclose a ________ ________ made between the spouses while they were married. In some jurisdictions, the privilege also permits one spouse to prevent the other spouse from testifying as to the confidential communication.

A

confidential communication

103
Q

The Marital Confidential Communications Privilege:
b. The privilege has two elements. The communication must be made:
(1) ?
(2)

A

(1) During a valid marriage; and

104
Q

The Marital Confidential Communications Privilege:
b. The privilege has two elements. The communication must be made:
(1)
(2) ?

A

(2) in reliance upon the intimacy of the marital relationship

105
Q

The Marital Confidential Communications Privilege:
c. Waiver/ Inapplicability of the privilege:
(1) ?
(2)
(3)
(4)

A

(1) If the communication is made in the presence of a stranger, then the privilege will be waived;

106
Q

The Marital Confidential Communications Privilege:
c. Waiver/ Inapplicability of the privilege:
(1)
(2) ?
(3)
(4)

A

(2) The privilege does not apply in actions (lawsuits) between spouses (i.e., divorces).

107
Q

The Marital Confidential Communications Privilege:
c. Waiver/ Inapplicability of the privilege:
(1)
(2)
(3) ?
(4)

A

(3) The privilege does not apply in criminal cases against the testifying spouse; and

108
Q

The Marital Confidential Communications Privilege:
c. Waiver/ Inapplicability of the privilege:
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4) ?

A

(4) The privilege does not apply to actions against either of the spouse’s children (i.e., assault and battery, incest, bigamy, child abuse, child endangerment or neglect, etc.)

109
Q

iii. The Spousal Testimonial Privilege.
1. Generally
This privilege protects a ______ _____ ______. The defendant’s spouse may not be called, and cannot be compelled, to testify against the defendant in any criminal proceeding. In this context, “criminal proceeding” includes a grand jury proceeding.

A

married criminal defendant

110
Q

iii. The Spousal Testimonial Privilege.
2. To Whom Does the Privilege Belong?

In federal courts, the privilege is held by the ________-________ it is not held by the defendant. So, if the witness- spouse chooses not to invoke the privilege, then she may testify.

In state courts, the person holding the privilege may vary from jurisdiction to jurisdiction. It can be held only by the witness-spouse of, in some states, it can be held by both parties. Therefore, in the latter situation, the defendant could prevent the witness-spouse from testifying.

A

witness-spouse;

111
Q

iii. The Spousal Testimonial Privilege.
The privilege has two elements:
1. ?
2.

A
  1. There must be a valid marriage; and
112
Q

iii. The Spousal Testimonial Privilege.
The privilege has two elements:
1.
2. ?

A
  1. The privilege lasts only while the marriage is valid.