Chapter 2 - Sources of Evidence: Witnesses (Evidence Book p. 75-77) Flashcards

(69 cards)

1
Q

Before a witness may testify in open court, that witness first must be deemed qualified, or eligible, or _____________ to take the stand.

A

competent

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

General rule of Competency. What Rule?

A

Rule 601

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

There is an extremely low threshold of competency requirements under Rule 601 because witnesses are _______ to be _________.

A

presumed to be competent

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Traditional common law witness disqualifications have been ___________.

A

eliminated

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

We now rely primarily on ______________________ to bring to light concerns about a witness’s credibility.

A

cross-examination

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Do a witness’s history of mental incapacitation, psychological problems, or drug/alcohol abuse disqualify a witness from testifying?

A

NO

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

A witness’s history of mental incapacitation, psychological problems, or drug/alcohol abuse does not disqualify a witness from testifying as long as the witness can ______________ in court to some degree and can appreciate the __________ ______ _______ _______ _________.

A

communicate

duty to tell the truth

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

A witness’s history of mental incapacitation, psychological problems, or drug/alcohol abuse does not disqualify a witness from testifying as long as the witness can communicate in court to some degree and can appreciate the duty to tell the truth. Such issues go to the witness’s __________, not competency, unless the witness cannot communicate at all or is completely unintelligible.

A

credibility

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Is there a minimum age requirement to testify?

A

No

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

There is no minimum age requirement to testify; it just depends on the ___________ and _____________ of the child.

A

intelligence and maturity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

An infant of 1-2 years presumably would not be able to communicate meaningfully, appreciate the difference between reality and a falsehood, and understand the duty to tell the truth. True or False.

A

True

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

It is a discretionary decision by the judge, who can ____ ______ the child - ask various questions of the child in order to make these determinations.

A

voir dire

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Because ____________ is still not fully understood, and is susceptible to suggestion and planted memories, previous ____________ witnesses are often not allowed to testify.

A

hypnosis

hypnotized

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Although courts can disallow regular witnesses from testifying when they have undergone previous hypnosis (or at least place limits upon them), a per se rule preventing a criminal defendant witness to testify who has undergone hypnosis is ___________________.

A

unconstitutional

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Although courts can disallow __________ ___________ from testifying when they have undergone previous hypnosis (or at least place limits upon them), a per se rule preventing a _________ __________ ___________ to testify who has undergone hypnosis is unconstitutional.

A

regular witnesses

criminal defendant witness

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Rule 605

A

Judges and Jurors as Witnesses

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Judges and Jurors as witnesses

A

Rule 605

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

___________ and _________ are incompetent to testify in cases before them.

A

judges and jurors

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Judges and jurors are _______________ to testify in cases before them.

A

incompetent

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Judges and jurors are incompetent to testify in cases before them. However jurors may be able to testify about previous cases on which they served, if:
1. ?
2.

A
  1. there was juror misconduct; and
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

Judges and jurors are incompetent to testify in cases before them. However jurors may be able to testify about previous cases on which they served, if:
1.
2. ?

A
  1. that misconduct was the result of an “extraneous outside influence.”
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

___________ __________ ___________ (such as a threat or bribe, or viewing improper evidence by jurors).

A

extraneous outside influence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

A juror cannot testify about juror misconduct resulting from ___________ _____________.

A

internal influences

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

mistaken mental impressions.

A

Internal Influences

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
alcohol or drugs consumed
Internal Influences
26
lack of sleep by jurors
Internal Influences
27
The policy is to preserve verdict stability, maintain public confidence in verdicts, and prevent later juror harassment.
A juror cannot testify about juror misconduct resulting from Internal Influences.
28
These statutes prohibit the testimony of an interested witness if that witness offers to testify about an issue where the only opposing witness would be a dead person.
State Dead Man Statutes
29
These statutes apply in some (not all) ______ _______; however, they also can apply in federal court in ___________ __________ (or if there is a supplemental state law claim in a federal question case.)
state courts diversity cases
30
Rule 601 treats these state provisions as "substantive," rather than "procedural" and so they apply in ____________ __________ under the Erie Doctrine.
diversity cases
31
The personal knowledge requirement
Rule 602
32
Rule 602
The personal knowledge requirement
33
A witness is qualified to testify only regarding those matters about which a witness has _____________ ____________.
personal knowledge
34
A witness is qualified to testify only regarding those matters about which a witness has personal knowledge - the extent to which the witness actually has __________ something _______ ________ in the case
perceived first hand
35
A witness is qualified to testify only regarding those matters about which a witness has personal knowledge - the extent to which the witness actually has perceived something first hand in the case and ___________ ___________.
reasonable opinions
36
A witness's general competency to testify is limited by the scope of that witness's ____________ ____________.
personal knowledge
37
A witness's general competency to testify is limited by the scope of that witness's personal knowledge. Important exceptions exist, such as Rule 702 ________ ___________, and Rule 801(d), 803, and 804(b) hearsay exclusions and exceptions
expert testimony
38
The Oath or Affirmation Requirement
Rule 603
39
Rule 603
The Oath or Affirmation Requirement
40
Under Rule 603, a witness must be willing to _________ _________ by oath or affirmation to awaken the witness's conscience regarding the duty to tell the truth under penalty of perjury.
testify truthfully
41
Under Rule 603 a witness must be willing to testify truthfully by _________ or ___________ to awaken the witness's conscience regarding the duty to tell the truth under penalty of perjury.
oath or affirmation
42
Are there official words the judge must use for an oath or affirmation?
No
43
There are no official words the judge must use, and the judge has the discretion to formulate the _______ or ____________.
oath or affirmation
44
Witness Examination
Rule 611
45
Rule 611
Witness Examination
46
The judge has a great deal of discretion to regulate the presentation of evidence, and witness testimony at trial. True or False?
True
47
Rule 611(a)
Direct Examination
48
Direct Examination
Rule 611(a)
49
Attorneys should generally ask ______ _______, ___________ ____________ who, what, when, where and why questions when examining a non-adverse/ non-hostile witness.
open ended - non-leading
50
Attorneys should generally ask open ended - non-leading ________, _________, _________, __________, and _______ questions when examining a non-adverse/ non-hostile witness.
who what when where why
51
The witness can tell the story (in a non-narrative way) supporting the party's legal claims or defenses while building rapport and establishing credibility. When is this done?
direct examination
52
The witness can tell the story (in a non-narrative way) supporting the party's legal claims or defenses while building ________ and establishing ____________.
rapport credibility
53
Rule 611(b) and (c)
Cross Examination
54
Cross Examination
Rule 611(b) and (c)
55
Under 611(b), the scope of the cross-examination is usually limited to the scope of the _______ _____________ unless the judge, in her discretion, allows the attorney to question beyond that scope.
direct examination
56
Through cross-examination, an attorney can strategically challenge the four testimonial capacities of the witness 1. ? 2. 3. 4.
1. perception of events
57
Through cross-examination, an attorney can strategically challenge the four testimonial capacities of the witness 1. 2. ? 3. 4.
2. memory of events
58
Through cross-examination, an attorney can strategically challenge the four testimonial capacities of the witness 1. 2. 3. ? 4.
3. communication of the story
59
Through cross-examination, an attorney can strategically challenge the four testimonial capacities of the witness 1. 2. 3. 4. ?
4. truthfulness of the witness (either their bias, their prior inconsistent statements, and/or their character for truthfulness).
60
Through cross-examination, an attorney can strategically challenge the four testimonial capacities of the witness 1. 2. 3. 4.
1. perception of events 2. memory of events 3. communication of the story and 4. truthfulness of the witness
61
Cross-Examination: Under 611(c), attorneys should ask short, concise, __________ __________ that suggest the answer the attorney is looking for in an effort to undermine the credibility of the witness.
leading questions
62
Refreshing a Witness's Memory
Rule 612
63
Rule 612
Refreshing a Witness's Memory
64
If a witness forgets a relevant fact either before or while testifying, an attorney can _________ that witness's ______________ of events by showing the witness a document either authored by the witness or another person.
refresh recollection
65
The document is used in this moment as a _________ _______ not as a ___________ for the witness's testimony.
memory spark replacement
66
Rule 612 then allows the opposition to request production of that document for _______ ___________ purposes.
cross examination
67
Rule 612 (Refreshing a Witness's Memory) The document itself is not admitted into evidence (unless the opposing party submits it), because it is not evidence, it was merely used to refers the witness's _______________.
recollection
68
Only the testimony from the witness's refreshed recollection is ____________.
evidence
69
Distinguish Rule 803 Past Recollection Recorded - a hearsay exception when a witness's recollection cannot be refreshed but was recorded in a document from Rule 612 Refreshed Recollection where the item/ document is used solely to refresh the witness's memory, and the witness can now testify from her memory. True!!!
True!!!