Chapter 7 Hearsay: Definition and Applications (Evidence Book p. 294-297) Flashcards

1
Q

Because _________ ________ of a witness is the hallmark of our adversarial truth-finding system, we generally want to hear only from witnesses who are actually in the court-room, and subject to ____ __________, rather than just being told about someone’s previous out of court statements.

A

cross-examination

cross-examination

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

The rule against hearsay makes such statements inadmissible because they are often unreliable, not subject to the scrutiny of cross-examination when made (where _______, _______, _______ and ________ of the person can be tested), usually not made under oath, and they deny to the parties the opportunity to confront witnesses against them, as well as deny to the jury the opportunity to assess the demeanor evidence of the person making the statement.

A

perception, memory, narration, and sincerity

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Hearsay Analysis. Consider the following five steps in determining whether an out-of-court statement is hearsay:
1. ?
2.
3.
4.
5.

A
  1. Identify the Declarant and identify the Witness who repeats the statement in court
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Hearsay Analysis. Consider the following five steps in determining whether an out-of-court statement is hearsay:
1.
2. ?
3.
4.
5.

A
  1. Determine whether the Declarant has made a “Statement”
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Hearsay Analysis. Consider the following five steps in determining whether an out-of-court statement is hearsay:
1.
2.
3. ?
4.
5.

A
  1. Determine whether or not the statement was one that the Declarant did not make while testifying at the current trial or hearing
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Hearsay Analysis. Consider the following five steps in determining whether an out-of-court statement is hearsay:
1.
2.
3.
4. ?
5.

A
  1. Determine if the “Statement” contains a direct assertion; and,
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Hearsay Analysis. Consider the following five steps in determining whether an out-of-court statement is hearsay:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5. ?

A
  1. Determine whether the statement was offered to prove the truth of the matter asserted in the statement.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

_________ is defined as an out-of-court statement (either written or oral assertions, or assertive conduct intended as a communication) made by a declarant (the person who made the assertion), and related in court by a witness (the person who heard, read, or saw the declarant’s out-of-court assertion), when that out-of-court statement is being used to “prove the truth of the matter asserted” by the declarant.

A

Hearsay

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Hearsay is defined as an out-of-court statement (either written or oral assertions, or assertive conduct intended as a communication) made by a __________ (the person who made the assertion), and related in court by a witness (the person who heard, read, or saw the declarant’s out-of-court assertion), when that out-of-court statement is being used to “prove the truth of the matter asserted” by the declarant.

A

declarant

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Hearsay is defined as an out-of-court statement (either written or oral assertions, or assertive conduct intended as a communication) made by a declarant (the person who made the assertion), and related in court by a witness (the person who heard, read, or saw the declarant’s out-of-court assertion), when that out-of-court statement is being used to “_______ _____ _____ _____ ______ _____ ______” by the declarant.

A

prove the truth of the matter asserted

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

A _________ is an intended communication made by the declarant.

A

statement

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

A statement is an _________ communication made by the declarant.

A

intended

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

A statement is an intended _________ made by the __________.

A

communication

declarant

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

__________ the person who made the assertion.

A

declarant

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Words that are spoken, or written constitute a statement, as long as those words are intended as a communication by a declarant who has “asserted” something. Implicit underlying assumptions of the declarant when making the statement, on the other hand, are not considered assertions, and therefore they are not “statements.” True or False.

A

True

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

____________ ________ by the declarant can be a statement by the declarant as long as the declarant engaging in the conduct is intending her conduct/actions to be a communication.

A

nonverbal conduct

17
Q

For example, pointing or nodding is assertive conduct. Also, offering a staged videotape of actions showing the plaintiff performing certain tasks in order to communicate the extent of his disability, would be ________ _______, and thus a statement (even though no words were spoken or written.)

A

assertive conduct

18
Q

If a declarant’s conduct is NOT intended as an assertion (such that they are just living life), then it is not ________, and a witness can testify about that non-assertive conduct as simply being observed behavior of someone who did not intend her conduct/actions/behavior as a communication or assertion of any kind.

A

hearsay

19
Q

The declarant’s non-assertive conduct (including even a question asked) would simply be circumstantial evidence of something else relevant in the case. True or False

A

True

20
Q

A _________ must be a human being who has made the out-of-court statement in question. Therefore, alleged “assertions” of a ______ ____ _______ (e.g., a clock, or thermometer, or radar gun), or of an _______ (e.g., bloodhound following a scent) are not statements because the declarant is not a person.

A

declarant

device or machine

animal

21
Q

However, a person who interprets the output of machines, devices, animal behavior, etc, or programs a computer, might make an inadmissible hearsay assertion about them. True or False.

A

True

22
Q

An out-of-court statement intended as a communication/assertion by the declarant, and related in court by a witness, may still not be considered hearsay, if it is being used for some _______ ________, other than to prove the truth of the matter asserted by the declarant in her out of court statement.

A

relevant purpose

23
Q

If spoken or written words have their own intrinsic legal value or consequences, such as defamation, threats, perjury, words contained in a contract, words of offer or acceptance, or sales invoices and cancelled checks to prove tax evasion, etc, then those words themselves are ________ ______ ______ (or ______ _______ of a ______ _______), and as such do not fit the definition of hearsay.

A

independent legal acts

verbal parts of a legal act

24
Q

If spoken or written words are used to show why a listener, reader, or observer, of an out of court statement, may have felt _________, afraid, angry, upset, put on ________, misled, etc., then such does not fit the definition of hearsay.

A

threatened

notice

25
Q

Some _______ conduct may be offered as evidence that the person acted as he did because of his belief in the existence of the condition sought to be proved, from which belief the existence of the condition may be inferred.

This observation is consistent with the purpose of the hearsay rule the exclusion of declarations whose veracity cannot be tested by cross-examination. There is some guarantee that an inference drawn from out-of-court behavior is trustworthy, because people base their actions on the correctness of their belief.

A

nonverbal

26
Q

If spoken or written words are used, not to show the truth of the matter asserted, but only as ______ ______ of what the declarant must have been thinking when those words were spoken or written then such does not fit the definition of hearsay.

A

circumstantial evidence

27
Q

For example, if a decent stated in her will that her husband failed to support her in life and therefore she leaves him one dollar it would not be hearsay if it is being used to prove that the descendant and he husband had a ______ ________.

A

troubled relationship

28
Q

As another example, if a declarant said my husband is disgusting that would be heresy but only if one were actually trying to prove that her husband was disgusting. If used only to show that she thinks badly of her husband, then it would not be hearsay. This is very similar to the analysis for effect on the listener, reader, or observer, above but it is focused on when the person affected is the declarant. True or False

A

True

29
Q

___________ of a witness using a prior inconsistent statement of that witness (Rule 613) is not hearsay because the cross-examining attorney is not using the prior inconsistent statement for its truth (in which case, it might be hearsay.)

A

impeachment

30
Q

Instead, the prior inconsistent statement is being used only to show that the witness story is inconsistent that the witness says different things at different times.

Meaning that what the witness said before is different from what the witness is saying now in court, so the jury ought to be made aware of it.

!!

A

!!

31
Q

The use of _______ has become a regular means of communication, or supplementing communication, between individuals.

A

emojis

32
Q

________ provide unique challenges in an evidentiary analysis including questions such as what is intended by the little icons, what icon is ultimately seen by the receiver, what does the picture mean in the context in which it is sent, and other questions.

A

Emoji

33
Q

Unfortunately, it can be difficult at times to determine what is meant by a particular emoji. One study estimated that emojis sent across platforms resulted in an error rate of slightly above 20%. The same study showed an error rate within the same platform of a little less than 20%. Courts must evaluate _______ by the existing ______ rules unless, and until, they are revised.

A

emojis

hearsay

34
Q

There might be more than one _______ in a chain of hearsay statements.

A

declarant

35
Q

Jim told Sally who told me that the light was green for the plaintiff. Thus, there are ___ levels of out-of-cout statements being used here to prove the truth of the matter asserted.

A

2

36
Q

Under Rule 805, each level or leg of hearsay must have its own hearsay exclusion, or exception, to be admissible. If not, it is _________ _________.

A

inadmissible hearsay.