Chapter 1 - The Role of the Judge at Trial/ Burden of Proof at Trial (Evidence Book p. 35-36) Flashcards

1
Q

Judges, especially _______ judges have a good deal of control and discretion in administering their courtrooms and getting involved at trial.

A

federalW

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What rule gives courts broad control to set the mode and order of witnesses and question them as well.

A

Rule 611

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Although judges may generally comment on the evidence produced at trial, they must do so in such a manner that they appear to be neutral, especially when it comes to a credibility determination of a witness. True or False.

A

True

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

United States v. Yates deals with what?

A

Commenting on Evidence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Although judges may generally comment on the evidence produced at trial, they must do so in such a manner that they appear to be ________, especially when it comes to a ___________ determination of a _______.

A

neutral
credibility
witness

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Crandell v. United States deals with what?

A

Questioning Witnesses

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Although judges may pose questions to witnesses, they must do so in a way that they appear to be neutral; therefore, hostile, leading, or rhetorical questions, especially if asked in a doubting or challenging tone, should be avoided. Questions should be impartial. True or False.

A

True

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

The burden of proof is generally on the ____________________.

A

plaintiff/ prosecution

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

The burden of proof is generally on the plaintiff/ prosecution, as they are the ones asking to change the status quo (however, the burden can switch to the defendant if he poses an __________ ___________, or in other circumstances.

A

affirmative defense

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

The burden of proof has two parts:

A
  1. The burden of Production
  2. Burden of Persuasion
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

This is a requirement to produce some actual evidence supporting a legal claim or allegation, much like the summary judgment/ directed verdict standard in Civil Procedure (where the judge decides, as a matter of law, whether there is sufficient evidence for the jury to weigh at trial.)

A

Burden of Production

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

This is a requirement to convince the jury to weigh the evidence produced at trial in the favor of the party with the burden, according to the applicable standard of proof.

A

Burden of Persuasion

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

The amount of proof necessary to find in a party’s favor.

A

Standards of Proof

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What are the 3 standards of proof?

A

Preponderance of the Evidence
Clear and Convincing
Beyond a Reasonable Doubt

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

This is the “more likely than not” standard. The balance only needs to be slightly tipped in favor of the party with the burden (greater than 50%).

A

Preponderance of the Evidence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Explain Preponderance of the Evidence

A

This is the “more likely than not” standard. The balance only needs to be slightly tipped in favor of the party with the burden (greater than 50%).

17
Q

The balance needs to be tipped fairly strongly in favor of the party with the burden (generally considered around 75%).

A

Clear and Convincing

18
Q

Explain Clear and Convincing

A

The balance needs to be tipped fairly strongly in favor of the party with the burden (generally considered around 75%).

19
Q

In criminal cases, the balance needs to be tipped very strongly in favor of the prosecution (generally considered around 90-95%.)

A

Beyond a Reasonable Doubt

20
Q

Explain Beyond a Reasonable Doubt

A

In criminal cases, the balance needs to be tipped very strongly in favor of the prosecution (generally considered around 90-95%.)

21
Q
A