Chapter 3 Short & Happy Guide (Relevance) Flashcards
Federal Rules of Evidence Article 4 governs:
Relevance
Rule 401 is titled ______ ______ ________ _______.
Test for relevant evidence
Rule 402 provides in part, that _________ ________ is not ________.
Irrelevant evidence is not admissible
If a piece of evidence is not relevant, it is not __________.
Admissible
Rule _______ defines relevant evidence as that which has any tendency to make a fact more or less probable than it would be without the evidence and the fact is of consequence in determining the action.
401
As held by the Supreme Court, relevance under Rule _______ is determined in the context of the facts and arguments in a particular case, and thus are generally not amenable to broad per se rules (that would exclude the evidence).
401
How does one determine whether a piece of evidence meets the requirements of rule 401?
Generally, when a piece of evidence relates to an issue regarding a person, place, thing, time or event related to the lawsuit, then it is likely relevant.
Generally, when a piece of evidence relates to an issue regarding a person, place, thing, time or event related to the lawsuit, then it is likely relevant. This is often called _________ ________.
Logical relevance
Rule ______ provides that relevant evidence is admissible unless any of the following provides otherwise: the United States Constitution; a federal statute; these rules; or other rules prescribed by the Supreme Court.”
402
Suppose that Black Widow was on trial for the murder of husband number 4. Evidence that the woman used the death of husband number 2 may not have _________ _______ in the strictest sense. However, such evidence might lead to an inference that she caused the death of husband number 4.
Logical relevance
Certain people will occasionally file false claims, or file multiple claims, alleging the same or similar injuries. The defending party would like evidence if these prior incidents admitted. It is quite likely they will not be admitted. The reason for their exclusion is not that they are __________. They will be excluded based on another rule. Evidence of prior claims might result in a decision being made, on an _____ _______ such as an emotional one.
Irrelevant
Improper basis
Suppose John Smith is suing Walmart for a slip and fall accident. Evidence of an incident where Nancy slipped and fell in that same Walmart does not directly relate to John Smiths lawsuit. However, Nancy’s incident might be relevant to prove that:
A. ?
B.
C.
A. A defect or dangerous condition existed (slippery aisles)
Suppose John Smith is suing Walmart for a slip and fall accident. Evidence of an incident where Nancy slipped and fell in that same Walmart does not directly relate to John Smiths lawsuit. However, Nancy’s incident might be relevant to prove that:
A.
B. ?
C.
B. The defendant (Walmart) had knowledge of the defect or dangerous condition; and
Suppose John Smith is suing Walmart for a slip and fall accident. Evidence of an incident where Nancy slipped and fell in that same Walmart does not directly relate to John Smiths lawsuit. However, Nancy’s incident might be relevant to prove that:
A.
B.
C. ?
C. The defect or dangerous condition was the cause of the injury in the present lawsuit
A defendant might try to prove the absence of similar accidents or injuries. Courts may admit evidence of a lack of previous injuries to controversy allegations of prior knowledge of the defect or _______ ________.
Dangerous condition