Short and Happy Guide Chapter 5 - Character Evidence Flashcards

1
Q

The rules themselves do not provide a definition of what character evidence is. True or False.

A

True

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

The 7th circuit has described it as evidence that refers to elements of one’s disposition, such as honesty, temperance, or peacefulness, which shows a propensity to act a certain way in a certain situation.

A

Character Evidence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Evidence regarding someone’s general propensity traits or propensities, of a praiseworthy or blameworthy nature; evidence of a person’s moral standing in a community.

A

Character Evidence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

___________ _________ is often expressed in terms such as she’s a liar, he’s a thief, she’s always angry, he’s a killer, she’s forgetful, he’s violent, etc.

A

Character Evidence

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

We care about character evidence because of the concern that evidence of a person’s character might be used to persuade a fact-finder that a person did something, or acted in some way, because of their “_________” alone.

A

character

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

For example, suppose that Judy had been convicted of stealing diamonds. Currently, Judy is on trial for theft of diamonds. As a prosecutor, you would certainly want the jury to hear about the prior convictions, right? Sure! The thought being that if she committed four previous diamond thefts she, more likely than not, committed this one. A prosecutor would try to use those prior convictions to aid in obtaining this conviction. The rules of character evidence attempt to protect the defendant in circumstances such as these. After all, those prior convictions do not mean that Judy committed this particular crime, do they? !

A

!!

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Character Evidence; Other Crimes, Wrongs or Acts

A

Rule 404

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Methods of Proving Character

A

Rule 405

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Sex-Offense Cases: The Victim’s Sexual Behavior or Predisposition.

A

Rule 412

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Similar Crimes in Sexual- Assault Cases

A

Rule 413

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Similar Cases in Child-Molestation Cases

A

Rule 414

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Similar Acts in Civil Cases Involving Sexual Assault or Child Molestation

A

Rule 415

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Who May Impeach

A

Rule 607

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

A witness’s Character for Truthfulness or Untruthfulness.

A

Rule 608

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Impeachment by Evidence of a Criminal Conviction

A

Rule 609

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Character Evidence is impacted by three different things:
1. ?
2.
3.

A
  1. The purpose for which the character evidence is offered.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Character Evidence is impacted by three different things:
1.
2. ?
3.

A
  1. the method used to prove the character evidence; and
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Character Evidence is impacted by three different things:
1.
2.
3. ?

A
  1. Whether the case is a criminal case or a civil case
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Character Evidence is impacted by three different things:
1.
2.
3.

A
  1. The purpose for which the character evidence is offered;
  2. the method used to prove the character evidence; and
  3. whether the case is a criminal case or a civil case
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Rule ________ sets out the initial prohibition: “Evidence of a person’s character or character trait is not admissible to prove that on a particular occasion the person acted in accordance with the character or trait. That is the starting point.

A

Rule 404(a)(1)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

Start Here.
Does the evidence in question relate to a person’s character or character trait? FRE 404(a)(1).

If yes, Is the evidence being offered to prove that on a particular occasion, the person acted in accordance with the character or character trait? FRE 404(a)(1).

If yes, Is the evidence that of a witness’s character? (that is, someone actually testifying at trial) FRE 404(a)(3).

If no, is this a criminal case?

If no, if you have traveled this far through the chart, then no exceptions apply and the character evidence, or character trait, will not be admitted. !

A

!1

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

Does the evidence in question relate to a person’s character or character trait? FRE 404(a)(1).

If no,

A

Rule 404 does not apply.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

Does the evidence in question relate to a person’s character or character trait? FRE 404(a)(1).

If yes, Is the evidence being offered to prove that on a particular occasion, the person acted in accordance with the character or character trait? FRE 404(a)(1).

If no,

A

Rule 404 does not apply.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

Does the evidence in question relate to a person’s character or character trait? FRE 404(a)(1).

If yes, Is the evidence being offered to prove that on a particular occasion, the person acted in accordance with the character or character trait? FRE 404(a)(1).

If yes, is the evidence that of a witness’s character? (That is, someone actually testifying at the trial) FRE 404(a)(3).

If yes, Potential Exceptions include rules:
1.
2.
3.
FRE 404(a)(3)

A
  1. 607
  2. 608, and
  3. 609

govern the admission of evidence.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Q

Does the evidence in question relate to a person’s character or character trait? FRE 404(a)(1).

If yes, Is the evidence being offered to prove that on a particular occasion, the person acted in accordance with the character or character trait? FRE 404(a)(1).

If yes, is the evidence that of a witness’s character? (That is, someone actually testifying at the trial) FRE 404(a)(3).

If no, is this a criminal case? FRE 404(a)(2)

If yes, In ________ _______, certain exceptions apply to Defendants and Victims. Rule 404(a)(2) sets out those exceptions.

A

criminal cases

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
26
Q

At this point, you have determined whether character or trait evidence will, or will not, be admitted. If it is inadmissible, your analysis is complete. If it is admissible, then you must turn to Rule _____. Rule ____ sets forth the methods by which one may prove character evidence. There is never a reason to look at Rule _____, unless you have determined that character evidence is admissible under 404.

A

Rule 405

405

405

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
27
Q

The first exceptions listed under the Rule 404(a)(2)(A), (B), and (C) apply potentially to defendants and victims in _________ _________ only. Do not forget that you will not be looking at these exceptions unless you are attempting to admit evidence under 404(a)(1).

A

Criminal Cases

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
28
Q

Rule 404(a)(2)(A)

A

A defendant’s Character in a Criminal Case

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
29
Q

A ________ may offer evidence of her pertinent character trait. Rule 404(a)(2)(A).

A

defendant

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
30
Q

If you consider policy behind the prohibition (consider the story of the diamond thief above), then it makes sense that a criminal defendant should be permitted to offer evidence of her own ___________. Rule 404(a)(2)(A).

A

character

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
31
Q

If the diamond thief thinks evidence of a particular character trait will help her, she can take the risk and have the evidence admitted. What rule?

Once admitted – the prosecutor may offer evidence to _______ it.

A

Rule 404(a)(2)(A)

rebut

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
32
Q

Rule 404(a)(2)(B)

A

A Victim’s Character Offered by a Defendant in a Criminal Case.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
33
Q

__________ may offer evidence of the ________ pertinent character trait. However, the admission of this evidence is subject to the limitations in Rule 412.

A

defendants

victims

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
34
Q

Just as with the defendant’s character, once admitted – the prosecution may offer evidence to rebut it; and, the prosecution may offer evidence of the __________ same character trait. Rule 404(a)(2)(B).

A

defendants

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
35
Q

Rule 404(a)(2)(C)

A

A Victim’s Trait of Peacefulness in a Homicide Case

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
36
Q

In ______ cases (and ONLY in ______ cases - don’t forget this), the prosecutor may offer evidence of the alleged victim’s trait of peacefulness to rebut evidence that the victim was the first aggressor. Rule 404(1)(2)(C).

A

homicide

homicide

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
37
Q

Example: Doug is on trial for the murder of Val. Doug’s defense is that he was attacked by Val, and so he shot Val in self-defense. The prosecutor may put on evidence that Val was known throughout the community as a mild-mannered, peaceful individual that never raised his hand or his voice. What does this refer to?

A

Rule 404(a)(2)(C). A Victim’s Trait of Peacefulness in a Homicide Case.

38
Q

Rule _______ does not govern when character evidence is admissible, only how in what form the evidence will be admitted.

A

405(a)

39
Q

Methods of Proving Character:
1.
2.

A
  1. By Reputation or Opinion
  2. By Specific Instances of Conduct
40
Q

Under Rule 405(a), Character Evidence may be proved by testimony about:
1.
2.

The rule only permits ________ or _______ testimony, not specific examples.

A
  1. the person’s reputation or,
  2. an opinion about the person’s character

reputation or opinion

41
Q

Rule 405(a) only permits reputation or opinion testimony, not specific examples. However, if that opinion or reputation testimony is admitted, then the court MAY permit questions about ________ ________ of relevant conduct.

A

specific instances

42
Q

Let’s say that character evidence is permitted as to John Doe. Wally the Witness testifies that, in his opinion, John is a dishonest person (opinion testimony). On cross-examination, Wally could be asked about the time that John found a wallet on the street with $500 in cash and turned it into the police station (a specific instance of conduct). !

A

!

43
Q

Rule _______ permits specific instances of a person’s conduct when a person’s character trait is an essential element of a charge, claim, or defense.

‘the relevant question under rule _____ should be: would proof, or failure of proof, of the character trait by itself actually satisfy an element of the charge, claim, or defense? if not, then character is not essential, and evidence should be limited to opinion or reputation.

A

405(b)

405

44
Q

The exceptions for witnesses permitted by rule _______ apply to both civil and criminal cases.

A

Rule 404(a)(3)

45
Q

The exceptions for witnesses permitted by Rule 404(a)(3) apply to both civil and criminal cases. Rules 404(a)(3) provides that evidence of a witness’s character may be admitted under Rules _____, _____, and _____.

A

607

608

609

46
Q

Who may Impeach a Witness. What rule?

A

609

47
Q

This rule permits _________ to impeach a witness even the party that called the witness. This was promulgated because, in the old days, the party who called a witness also vouched for them. This prevented a party from attacking his or her own witness. The problem with the old rule was that sometimes a party wanted to call a witness that was not aligned with the party; a bad guy so to speak. the old rule prevented that. Now, under rule 607, a party may call and impeach a bad guy.

A

anyone

48
Q

To be reviewing evidence under this rule, you have already determined that you are offering evidence which would be impermissible under 404(a)(1) and does not meet an exception under 404(a)(2). Rule 404(a)(3), however, sets forth exceptions for witnesses under rules 607, 608, and 609.

Rule 608 is divided into two areas:
1.
2.

A
  1. reputation or opinion evidence and
  2. specific instances of conduct
49
Q

Reputation or Opinion Evidence. What rule?

A

608(a)

50
Q

Rule 608(a) identifies, what, when and how it is permitted.

What:
1.
2.

A
  1. The witness’s reputation for truthfulness
  2. The witness’s reputation for untruthfulness
51
Q

Rule 608(a) identifies, what, when and how it is permitted.

When:
1.
2.

A
  1. Evidence as to untruthfulness may be attacked at any time.
  2. Evidence as to truthfulness may only be offered after then witness’s character for truthfulness has been attacked.
52
Q

Rule 608(a) identifies, what, when and how it is permitted.

How:
1.

A
  1. Testimony about that witness’s reputation.
53
Q

Specific Instances of Conduct.

What rule?

A

Rule 608(b)

54
Q

Scenario: David was previously caught shoplifting but no criminal charges were brought. Suppose David is on the witness stand and the lawyer on then opposing side of the case wants to discredit David.

She (the lawyer) believes that if evidence of this shoplifting incident is revealed then the fact-finder is less likely to believe David’s testimony (challenge his truthfulness).

The first thing we have to determine is: who is asking the questions.

If the lawyer is asking questions on ______ ________ then questions as to the shoplifting incident are permitted.

But the court may, on cross-examination, allow them to be inquired into if they are probative of the character for __________ or _________ of (1) the witness.. In this case, the rule permits the questions.

A

direct evidence

truthfulness or untruthfulness

55
Q

In examining evidence subject to Rule 608, you must determine the following:
1. ?
2.
3.
a.
b.

A
  1. Is the evidence a criminal conviction under Rule 609
56
Q

In examining evidence subject to Rule 608, you must determine the following:
1.
2. ?
3.
a.
b.

A
  1. Is the question on direct or cross-examination;
57
Q

In examining evidence subject to Rule 608, you must determine the following:
1.
2.
3. ?
a.
b.

A
  1. Is the evidence regarding:
58
Q

In examining evidence subject to Rule 608, you must determine the following:
1.
2.
3. Is the evidence regarding:
a. ?
b.

A
  1. the witness to whom the question is directed; or
59
Q

In examining evidence subject to Rule 608, you must determine the following:
1.
2.
3. Is the evidence regarding:
a.
b. ?

A

b. another witness whose character the witness being cross-examined has testified about.

60
Q

Rule 608 applies to all witnesses, whether they are the ________ or the ______.

A

defendant or victim

61
Q

Impeachment by Evidence of a Criminal Conviction
What rule?

A

Rule 609

62
Q

A criminal conviction when the crime in the convicting jurisdiction was punishable by _____ or _______ for more than one year. Note: The rule does not require that the person actually served for more than one year in prison - only that the punishment could have been for more than a year.FRE 609(a)(1).

A

death or imprisonment

63
Q

A criminal conviction when the crime in the convicting jurisdiction was punishable by death or imprisonment for ______ than ____ _____. FRE 609(a)(1).

A

more than one year

64
Q

In a ______ _____ - the evidence must be admitted if it survives a Rule 403 analysis. FRE 609(a)(1)(A).

A

civil case

65
Q

In a civil case - the evidence ______ be admitted if it survives a Rule 403 analysis. FRE 609(a)(1)(A).

A

MUST

66
Q

In a _______ _____ - if the witness is not the defendant the evidence must be admitted if it survives a Rule 403 analysis. FRE 609(a)(1)(A).

A

criminal case

67
Q

In a _______ ______- if the witness is the defendant the evidence must be admitted if the probative value outweighs its prejudicial effect to the defendant. FRE 609(a)(1)(B). Notice that this rule gives us what we call a “reverse 403” analysis because it is similar to Rule 403, but the requirement is flipped.

A

criminal case

68
Q

FRE 609(a)(2): Any ____ ______ with elements of dishonesty or false statements regardless of the punishment.

A

criminal conviction

69
Q

In either a ____ case or a _____ case - the evidence must be admitted if the court can readily determine that establishing the elements of the crime required proving or the witness’s admitting a dishonest act or false statement.

A

civil or criminal

70
Q

The exceptions under FRE 609(a) have a specific limitation as to the admission of the evidence and the limitation is governed by FRE ______.

A

609(b)

71
Q

The limitation under 609(b) only applies if more than ______ ____ have passed since
1. the witness’s conviction; or 2. the witness’s release from confinement for it - whichever is later.

A

10 years

72
Q

The limitation under 609(b) only applies if more than 10 years have passed since
1.
2.

A
  1. the witness’s conviction
  2. the witness’s release from confinement for it

whichever is later

73
Q

John Doe is convicted of the crime of fraud.

1/31/05 - conviction

1-31-06 - Imprisonment

1-31-09 - Release

5-15-17 - Date of Trial

Do the limitations of 609(b) apply?

A

The conviction is more than 10 years old; however, the date of release is less than 10 years old. Therefore, the limitations of 609(b) would not apply, and the prior conviction would be admissible.

74
Q

There are at least 2 circumstances when the date of conviction may be the date we apply under the rule:
1. ?
2.

A
  1. a defendant may be sentenced to time served which might have ended before the actual conviction date (the date of the conviction is the later date of the two.)
75
Q

There are at least 2 circumstances when the date of conviction may be the date we apply under the rule:
1.
2. ?

A
  1. a defendant may not have to serve any time, so the conviction date is all that would matter.
76
Q

Under Rule 609(a)(1), the crime must be “punishable by imprisonment for more than one year,” NOT actually imprisoned for more than one year (or even imprisoned at all.) True or False

A

True

77
Q

Assuming the time period for the conviction applies, then the court ______ admit the evidence subject to the limitations set forth in the applicable subparts under FRE 609(a)(1) and (2).

A

MUST

78
Q

When 609(b) applies, things are very different. Under this subpart, the evidence will only be admissible if two conditions are met:
1. ?
2.

A
  1. The probative value of the evidence (supported by specific facts and circumstances) substantially outweighs the prejudicial effect of the evidence (another reverse 403).
79
Q

When 609(b) applies, things are very different. Under this subpart, the evidence will only be admissible if two conditions are met:
1.
2. ?

A
  1. The proponent of the evidence gives the adverse party written notice of the intent to use it so that the party has a fair opportunity to contest its use.
80
Q

Rule 609(c) sets forth additional limitations. If Rule 609(c) applies, then evidence of the conviction will NOT be admissible. Evidence of the conviction will not be admissible when
1. ?
2.
3.
4.
AND The person has not been convicted of a later crime punishable by death or imprisonment for more than one year.

A
  1. The conviction has been the subject of a pardon
81
Q

Rule 609(c) sets forth additional limitations. If Rule 609(c) applies, then evidence of the conviction will NOT be admissible. Evidence of the conviction will not be admissible when
1.
2. ?
3.
4.
AND The person has not been convicted of a later crime punishable by death or imprisonment for more than one year.

A
  1. The conviction has been the subject of an annulment
82
Q

Rule 609(c) sets forth additional limitations. If Rule 609(c) applies, then evidence of the conviction will NOT be admissible. Evidence of the conviction will not be admissible when
1.
2.
3. ?
4.
AND The person has not been convicted of a later crime punishable by death or imprisonment for more than one year.

A
  1. The conviction has been the subject of a certificate of rehabilitation
83
Q

Rule 609(c) sets forth additional limitations. If Rule 609(c) applies, then evidence of the conviction will NOT be admissible. Evidence of the conviction will not be admissible when
1.
2.
3.
4. ?

AND The person has not been convicted of a later crime punishable by death or imprisonment for more than one year.

A
  1. The conviction has been the subject of a procedure that is the equivalent of a pardon or annulment or certificate of rehabilitation.
84
Q

Evidence is not admissible per 609(c)(2):

The conviction has been the subject of a pardon, annulment, or other equivalent procedure based on a finding of innocence. True or False.

A

True

85
Q

The next limitation is set out in Rule 609(d). Under this limitation, evidence of the previous conviction shall not be admissible if all four conditions are met:
1. ?
2.
3.
4.

A
  1. The evidence is offered in a criminal case only
86
Q

The next limitation is set out in Rule 609(d). Under this limitation, evidence of the previous conviction shall not be admissible if all four conditions are met:
1.
2. ?
3.
4.

A
  1. The adjudication being offered into evidence is of a witness other than the defendant in the criminal case in which it is offered;
87
Q

The next limitation is set out in Rule 609(d). Under this limitation, evidence of the previous conviction shall not be admissible if all four conditions are met:
1.
2.
3. ?
4.

A
  1. A conviction for the same offense for which an adult would be convicted, is admissible to attack any person’s credibility; and
88
Q

The next limitation is set out in Rule 609(d). Under this limitation, evidence of the previous conviction shall not be admissible if all four conditions are met:
1.
2.
3.
4. ?

A
  1. Admission of the evidence is necessary to fairly determine guilt or innocence
89
Q

Rule 609(e): Pendency of an appeal. A conviction that satisfies this rule is admissible even if an appeal is pending. Evidence of the pendency is also admissible.

Although a conviction is on appeal, the appeal does not affect the admissibility of the conviction. However, evidence of the pendency of the appeal would also be admissible. True or False.

A

True

90
Q
A