Sexual Crimes - Lesson Notes Flashcards
What must be proved
There was an intentional act by the offender involving sexual connection AND
the complainant did not consent to the sexual act AND
the offender did not believe the complainant was consenting OR
If he did believe that she was consenting, the grounds for such a belief were not reasonable
Consent
Consent is a persons conscious and voluntary agreement to something desired or proposed by another
Under section 128 (4) does a husband have legal defence
No
Penalty, act, section, ingrediants of Rape and U/l sexual connection
20 years
Rape: 128(1)(a) - A person rapes another person
U/L sexual connection: 128(1)(b) - a person has unlawful sexual connection with another person
Section 128(2)
Person A rapes person B if person A has sexual connection with person B effected by the penetration of person B genitalia by person A penis
(a) without person Bs consent to the connection AND
(b) without believeing on reasonable grounds person B consents to the connection
Section 128(3)
Person A has u/l sexual connection with person B if person A has sexual connection with person B
(a) without person Bs consent to the connection AND
(b) without believeing on reasonable grounds person B consents to the connection
Proof of penetration
Proof of penetration may be established by:
The complaiants evidence
The medical examination (injuries/DNA)
The defendants admissions
Presumption of age
Section 127 CA 1961
There is no presumption of law that a person is incapable of sexual connection because of his or her age
(this means any person of any age is capable (in a legal sense) of being involved in sexual connection
Reasonable grounds test
what makes a sexual connection unlawful
Reasonable Grounds:
The establishing of reasonable grounds is a 3 step process
The crown must prove:
Subjective test 1: Absence of consent
What was the complainant thinking at the time, Was the complainant consenting
Subjective test 2: Belief in consent
If the complainant was not consenting did the offender believe the complainant was consenting, What was offender thinking at the time
Objective test: Reasonable grounds for belief in consent
If the offender believed the complainant was consenting, was that belief reasonable in the circumstance. what would a reasonable person have believed of placed in the same position as the defendant
Matters that do not constitue consent
Section 128A CA 1961
not protesting or offering physical resistance to use of force
application of force to self or others, threats of force to self or others, or fear of force to self or others
Asleep or unconscious
so affected by alcohol or drugs that they cannot consent
so affected by mental or physical impairment they cannot consent
mistaken ID
mistaken as to nature and quality of the act
Attempted Sexual Violation
Section 129(1) CA 1961 - Everyone who attempts to commit sexual violation is liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding 10 years
Assault with intent to commit sexual violation
Section 129(2) CA 1961 - A person assaults another person with intent to commit sexual violation of the other person - 10 years
Proving intent
The offenders actions and words before, during, and after the event
The surrounding circumstances
the nature of the act itself
Examples of acts the constitute an attempt
lying in wait - searching for or following the victim
enticing the victim to go to the scene of the contemplated crime
u/l entry of a structure, vehicle or enclosure in which it is contemplated that the offence with be committed.
In an attempted sexual violation or assault with intent to commit, what must be proved
The defendant
intended to have sexual connection with the victim AND
the victim did not consent to the sexual connection AND
the defendant did not believe on reasonable grounds that the victim was consenting
Can a child under 12 consent
Consent is no defence for a child under 12 years
What are the differences between attempted sexual violation and assault with intent to commit sexual violation
an attempt to commit sexual violation does not necessarily involve an assault
• an assault with intent to commit sexual violation may not be sufficiently proximate to the full offence to constitute an attempt.
Attempts legislation
Every one who, having an intent to commit an offence, does or omits an act for the purpose of accomplishing his object, is guilty of an attempt to commit the offence intended, whether in the circumstances it was possible to commit the offence or not.
How to prove intent
- the offender’s actions and words before, during and after the event
- the surrounding circumstances
- the nature of the act itself.
Assault definition
Assault means the act of intentionally applying or attempting to apply force to the person of another, directly or indirectly, or threatening by any act or gesture to apply such force to the person of another, if the person making the threat has, or causes the other to believe on reasonable grounds that he has, present ability to effect his purpose
What are the three offences under s132
s 132(1) Sexual connection with a child - 14 years s 132(2) Attempted sexual connection with a child - 10 years s 132(3) Indecent Act on a child - 10 years