Session 8: Understanding and motivating individuals and teams at work Flashcards
Mullins (2013) suggests that motivation is the driving force within us that pushes us to meet some need or expectation.
One approach to thinking about these complex motivational needs and expectations is to categorise into 3 sections which are:
- economic rewards – to meet tangible needs for pay, pension, material goods and security
- intrinsic satisfaction – derived from the nature of the work itself, including interesting work, personal growth and development
- social relationships – friendships, affiliation, status and dependency
This means that motivation varies over time and there is no ready-made solution
An understanding of what people feel and how they think is the foundation for two cognitive theories of motivation which are:
- Content theories attempt to explain specific things that motivate an individual at work – writers include Maslow, Alderfer, Herzberg and McClelland
- Process theories attempt to identify the relationship among dynamic variables that make up motivation – these include expectancy theories, equity theory, goal theory and attribution theory
Expectancy theory states that what motivates an individual is a combination of 3 factors namely:
(Developed by Victor H. Vroom in 1964,)
- Expectancy,
- Instrumentality and
- Valence.
- Expectancy is
Expectancy is one’s belief that putting effort into a certain task will lead to desired performance
i.e. effort (E) = performance (P)
the belief is based on individuals past performance, their perceived level of control as well as their self-efficacy (as one’s belief in one’s ability to succeed in specific situations or accomplish a task)
Instrumentality is
Instrumentality is the belief that performance will lead to desired rewards
i.e. performance (P) = rewards/outcomes (O)
Valency is
Valence is the value an individual place on the rewards of an outcome.
Motivational Force (MF) =
Expectancy x Instrumentality x Valence.
A useful way of setting the context for the employment relationship and our focus on trust, commitment and engagement is the
Employment Relations and Business Performance Model (CIPD, 1997:5) which entails the following
- People Management Practices - job design, skills development and involvement climate
- Psychological Contract - trust fairness, delivery of the deal
3, Commitment - motivation, willing contribution and satisfaction
- Productivity - profit and agility
The nature and interrelationships between trust, are useful to see the impact that the line managers have by
Trust is based on reliability and consistency, and trust builds confidence.
Research and practice demonstrate that trust in management is a key predictor of commitment and engagement, as well as for the development of the social capital of organisations (Nahapiet & Ghoshal, 1998).
Without trust there is little or no glue to bind teams and organisations together.
Commitment is
is usually seen in terms of a positive attitude, which may have both rational and emotional aspects.
NB there is no single definition of commitment
Meyer & Allen (1997) have referred to three main types of commitment:
- Affective – wanting to stay
- normative – feeling should stay
- continuance – staying because of barriers to leaving (cost, lifestyle, pension etc)
Engagement is more than commitment or
engagement is a positive work-related state?
There is some difference in approach between those who see engagement as a step beyond commitment and going the extra mile for the organisation,
and those who see engagement as more localised than commitment and as a positive work-related state of mind in which a person expresses themselves in their role
Key antecedents (things that came before) or promoting factors of trust are defined as:
- Before Trust, the following is needed:
a. involvement and empowerment;
b. open communication and provision of relevant information;
c. perceptions of managerial competence;
d. fairness and equity - Likewise, the Outcomes or consequences of trust are:
a. effective communication;
b. motivation and commitment;
c. creativity and innovation;
d. ability to cope with change
Key antecedents (things that came before) or promoting factors of commitment are defined as:
- Before I Commit the following is needed:
a. personality characteristics;
b. culture;
c. leadership style;
d. involvement in decision-making - Likewise, the Outcomes or consequences of commitment are:
a. job satisfaction;
b. job performance;
c. service quality;
d. readiness for change;
e. lower turnover
Key antecedents (things that came before) or promoting factors of engagement are defined as:
- Before engagement, the following are needed:
a. employers take an interest in employee well-being;
b. employees feel their contribution is valued;
c. involvement in decision-making;
d. challenging work and the resources to do it;
e. opportunities for development - Likewise, the Outcomes or consequences of engagement are:
a. job satisfaction;
b. customer satisfaction;
c. organisational performance including profitability;
d. discretionary effort