SECTION E: Cromwell's Parliaments and Protectorate Flashcards
March 1649
- 17th: The act abolishing monarchy is passed
- 19th: The act abolishing the House of Lords is passed
May 1649
- 14-15th: A leveller rebellion is put down at Burford
- 19th: The act declaring England a Commonwealth is passed
August 1649
2nd: Battle of Rathmines takes place
From 15th August-28th May 1650, Cromwell is in Ireland
September 11th 1649
- Drogheda falls
11th October 1649
- Wexford falls
2nd January 1650
- The Engagement Act is passed
10th May 1650
- The Adultery Act is passed
June 1650
- Charles II arrives in Scotland
- 28th: Cromwell is appointed Lord General in place of Fairfax
22nd July 1650 - August 1651
- Cromwell leads the English army in Scotland
9th August 1650
- Blasphemy Act is passed
September 1650
3rd: Battle of Dunbar takes place
27th: Toleration Act is passed
January 1651
1st: Charles II is crowned King by the Scots
July-August 1651
- Charles II invades England
3rd September 1651
- Battle of Worcester takes place
October 1651
15th: Following his defeat in the Battle of Worcester, Charles II flees to the continent
9th: Navigation Act is passed
January 1652
The Hale Commission on law reform is appointed
19th May 1652
- First Anglo-Dutch war begins
20th April 1653
- Charles dissolves the Rump Parliament
4th July 1653
- Nominated Assembly convenes
12th December 1653
- The Nominated Assembly returns power to Cromwell
Cromwell’s attitudes towards the Rump and ambitions in 1649
- Wanted to respect the constitution, but also to achieve Godly reformation now that Parliament had been purged
- Willingness for such reformation was not a criteria for remaining in the Rump, which would explain why they didn’t grant Cromwell reform when he requested it
Cromwell’s attitude to the execution of the King in 1649
- What was done was done, and they must now work to reform the State
- Sought to gain new support for the regime Ie through lord Saye and his son Nathaniel Fiennes
- Encouraged those excluded back to the Rump conditional on the acceptance of it
- Neutral towards Rump as he saw it as a temporary and for the next two years he would be concerned with campaigning
Cromwell’s four objectives in 1651
1) Wanted Rump to dissolve itself and hold new elections
2) Broad amnesty, greater cooperation from ex Royalists
3) Wanted union between the three kingdoms
4) Godly, judicial reformation
Reasons for Cromwell’s ensuing frustration with the Rump
- Failed to extend the commissions for the propogation of the gospel from the dark corners of the land –> The whole country
- Failed to explore alternative tithes for maintenance of the ministry
- Failure to carry forward his propositions (in a letter from Dunbar) to review inequities in the legal process
- Stagnation after the Hale Committee suggestions
What did the Army wish for in August of 1652, and how did Cromwell respond?
- Nine hour meeting of army council on 2nd August 1652
- -> Declaration of the army to the Lord General Cromwell for the dissolving of this present Parliament: Asked for dissolution and fresh elections, and that new Parliament reforms judical process, tithes corruption, reform of provisions for poor and war veterans/widows/disabled ect
- —–> Cromwell agreed, but wanted the Rump to respond positively. Arranged 12 meetings of MPs and officers in following months but know progress made
Cromwell’s frustrations by 1653
- Frustration at lack of Godly reformation
- They were intended to be an interim Government, but had sat for too long doing nothing
- Further prevarications:
(i) Failed to address £31 000 monthly deficit on army wage bill
(ii) Corruption: Rumpers privileged each other to best plots > army in the redistribution of Irish land - Army wanted immediate dissolution, Cromwell barely prevented this at army council meeting of 11th March 1653. Said it would be easier after peace made with Dutch, but on 15th March 1653 the Rump refused to open Negotiations!
Why did Cromwell dissolve the Rump?
- 19th April: Cromwell says they must pick a replacement gvt of 40, then abdicate
- Next day, Cromwell hears they were discussing bill of their own
- 20th, Scolds and dissolves them
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ - Believed criteria for sitting on new assembly would not be strict enough
- Bill might advocate for perpetual Parliaments
- Rump’s decision to delay own dissolution until 3 Nov 1653 was intolerable
- If he wanted leading power here, he could have taken it. The fact he increasingly sought to avoid a leading role was testament to his lack of ambition
An overview of the challenges facing the Rump Parliament in 1649
- Political and religious opposition in England, Scotland and Ireland
- Hated and feared by monarchs on the continent
- Seen as army’s creation, so lacked legitimate leadership
Actions:
Crushed leveller revolt
Defeated Irish
Defeated Scottish
End:
- Did not pass radical reform
- Did not dissolve itself
- Army + Cromwell dissolve it on 20th April 1653
Establishing the republic in 1649
- No blueprint for establishing the republic
- Divided decision since those expelled in Pride’s purged were permitted, even encouraged, to return
- As monarch was gone, monarch had to go, and therefore Lords had to go too
- -> March 1649 17th/19th Acts abolishing Monarchy and Lords
- In May, England declared a Commonwealth. Council of State replaces Privy Council and to have 41 elected annually by Rump Only 19 of 41 took Engagement swearing loyalty to Republic
The Engagement act
- 2nd January 1650
- First proposed by Henry Ireton for members of Council of State, later extended to all MPs
- Vowed to be extended to all males in England after it emerged Charles II had allied with Scots, not achievable
- Opposition from Presbyterian ministers who had sworn to follow Solemn League and Covenant. Those refusing to take it ejected in Nov 1650
- Repealed in Jan 1654 by Oliver Cromwell
- Gradually introduced but not rigorously enforced
- Allowed Rump to identify firmest enemies of the Republic
Why was there initially opposition to the Rump from the Army
- Large amounts of back pay
- Rump began to pay arrears in 1650
- April/May 1649, mutinies in London and Oxfordshire: Robert Lockyer shot in London, three shot in Burford
Leveller opposition to the Rump Parliament
- Levellers felt betrayed by the Rumps intentions to stay in existence for some time
- John Liburne returns to London to resume publishing radical content. February 1649, publishes “England’s new chains discovered”
- Richard Overton later publishes “The hunting of the foxes”
- -> Both imprisoned in the tower of London
- —–> May 1649, Third version of the Agreement of the People is issued
- Lilburne aquitted, others released once they agreed to take Oath of Engagement
- Army purged of Levellers and leaders now tackled, greatly weakened their cause. Now outflanked by more left-wing groups like the True Levellers, Diggers and religious sects such as the Fifth Monarchists and Quakers, who were too fragmented to compromise the regime