Sebastian And Hernandez Gil 2012 Flashcards
Aim
Investigate development of phonological loop in children 5-17 using digit span
Compare findings to previous research on adults, aged and dementia patients
Digit span
Memory span and capacity of STM without rehearsal
Sample
570 volunteer
Madrid 5-17
No hearing / reading / writing difficulties
Procedure
- 5 age groups ( cross sectional not longitudinal)
-Primary data of 570 Spanish volunteers aged 5-17 were used
A list of digits were read aloud, one per second with each of the 3 lists starting with 3 digits
Each time the ppts recalled the list in order, one more digit was added
The most number of digits recalled accurately indicated the digit span
This data was then compared with secondary data of the digit spans of 25 healthy people and 25 Alzheimer’s patients
Conclusion
Increased from 5-17 yo
Spanish shorter than English ( longer words) (subvocal rehearsal w WMM)
Elderly compared to dementia showed no sig difference, poor digit span consequence of age not dementia
Results younger ages
5 yo low digit span (3.76)
6-8 (4.34)
9 - (4to5)
11 - (5.13)
Results (elderly and dementia)
Elderly had shigher than 5 year olds
Patients w Alzheimer’s 4.2
Healthy old people 4.44
Generalisability
- high pop valid as sample was large
- could be generalised to target population
Reliability
Standardise procedure - good controls e,g time of day, stimuli shown)
High internal validity study could be replicated
Application
Can be applied to wider pop due to tracking transformations of digit span across ages
Gives idea of what age learning becomes easier
Can give aid to primary school and how students are educated
Validity
Artifical tests could decrease as demand characteristic
Not representative of how STM works in everyday life
Ecologically valid as set in school
Ethics
Children under 16 so would have to get consent through parents
Patients with dementia makes them vulnerable adults
Credibility
Supports WMM - proof of phonological loop and supports other studies