Practical Flashcards
Aim
Investigate whether more acoustically dissimilar words will be recalled by the STM than the similar words
Procedure
- 9 pps given paper and pen to write w, viewed slideshow 10 words, 3 seconds each
- acoustically similar words condition pps get a list of words that share a similar sound, 1 syllable
- then repeated procedure w acoustically dissimilar words condition, but pps show one syllable words w no similarity
- then we calculated the mean, median, more and range for both conditions from results recorded by pps. Then used the mean results to calculate the standard deviation for the conditions to see if our experiment was successful
- we used Wilcoxin process to test the significance of our results
- using the mean results of the two conditions we drew up a bad chart to show the difference in mean results
Results
Acoustically similar mean 2.6
Acoustically dissimilar 3.6
Difference is 1 shows easier to recite acoustically dissimilar words but not statistically significant
Calculated value T = 8 greater than critical value 5 for one tailed test at p 0.05 with n=8. Therefore results is not significant and the null hypothesis should be used
Conclusion
Results show it’s easier to encode words acoustically dissimilar as Brain doesn’t get confused w similar sounding words. But due to results from wilcoxen test difference is not statistically significant so does not make a difference
Generalisability
Make up
Androcentric
Culture bias
Ethnocentric
Private school educated
All 17
Should have used stratified sample, not opportunity sample
Reliability
Has standardised procedures, can be easily replicated
No specialist equipment, can use exact same words as Baddeley
Same words, same order, same time
Validity
Recall words in same order, reduced risk words could mean something or be unfamiliar
In a school environment gives ecological validity, used to taking tests
No task validity as in normal situation wouldn’t be asked to recall 10 words in order, not representative of everyday environment, demand characteristics, artificial behaviour
Should do test in different room to remove any distractions
Ethics
No psychological harm or distress
Debriefed and told them the true aim
Weren’t told true aim, lacked informed consent
Upset if others got more
Could have caused stress if pps felt pressure
Alternative hypothesis
Significantly more acoustically dissimilar words will be recalled the acoustically similar words
Null hypothesis
There will be no difference in amount of acoustically similar and dissimilar words recalled. Any difference would be due to chance
Which test is used
Wilcoxin critical value table
Why use the wilcoxin test
Test of difference
Levels of measurement is ordinal
Research design is repeated measures