Brainscape's Knowledge GenomeTM

Browse over 1 million classes created by top students, professors, publishers, and experts.


See full index

Candidacy > Science philosohpy 2 > Flashcards

Science philosohpy 2 Flashcards

1
Q

Science is the most powerful tool humans have developed

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Importance of science philosophy

A

Scrutinizing the validity of science

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What was science before 1700s

A

Scienc ebefore 1700s was “natural philosophy”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

“All the science is either physics or stamp collecting”

A

Reductionist statement by Ernest Rutherford

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Origin of mathematics

A

Born in Egypt and the Babylonians applied it to astronomy

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

The father of science

A

Thales of Miletus; 7th century B.C.; non-supernatural explanaitions of natural phenomena like thunder and earthquakes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Four important figures in Pre-Socratic science

A

1) Anaximander (600BC): suggested that life originated from water and mud and humans originated from lower life forms”
2) Pythagoras (500 BC): Important contributions to mathematics. was burned alive
3) Empedicles (400 BC): discovered air pressure using a straw
4) Democritus (450 BC): suggested matter was made of small atoms

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Scientific advancement during the dark ages

A

Carried on by the Islamic cultures (e.g., medicine, astronomy, chemistry)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Scholasticism

A

Attempt to reconcile Greek thought with biblical dogma; in Europe, 12th C

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Renaissance

A

Period from 1400 to 1700 in which sciene and art thrived; Bolstered by a rebirth of Greek humanism

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Thomas Aquinas

A

1200 CE; Proposed natural theology (knowing God by studying his creation); Very important in the development of new thought; Ultimately led to people turing away form religion

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Francis Bacon

A

Proposed the scientific method (i.e., observation and experimentation)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Scientific revolution (historic period)

A

A shift back to human reason instead of faith during 16th and 17th century

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Nicholas Copernicus

A

Heliocentric view of the universe, which replaced the Ptolemaic geocentric view

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Johannes Kepler

A

German astronomer who developed the laws of planetary motion in the 1600’s, improving ​ Coernicus’ model.

  1. Planetary orbits are elliptical
  2. Sun is not at center of orbits, but at a focal point
  3. Speed of planets not constant, but area speeed is
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Galileo Galilei

A

Italian astronomer (1600’s) who defended the Copernican model in addition to contributing to physics regarding velocity, gravity, and inertia.

Improved the telescope

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Instrumentalism

A

“Science is just a tool at doesn’t describe reality”; This view partly existed to get by with religion

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Isaac Newton

A

English Astronomer (1700’s) who established classical mechanics, built the first reflecting telescope, and discovered prismatic colour refraction.

Newton’s law of universal gravitation: Every particle attracts every other particle in the universe as a function of mass/distance.

Wrote “Mathematical principles of natural philosophy”

His works marks the age of enlightentment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Antoine Lavoisier

A

Determined fire is oxigen

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Darwin

A

Inspired by Linnaeus; proposed evolution (originally proposed by his grandgather) but most importantly provided natural selection as a mechanism and lots of data to back his theory

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

Mendel

A

His work on genetics helped confirm Darwinism

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

Science

A

The systematic building and organization of knowledge

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

Semmelweiss

A

1865; “doctors who wash their hands give less infections when delivering babies”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
24
Q

Louis Pasteur

A

1881; Germ theory

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
25
Q

The four most important figures championing the use of reason in philosophy

A

1) Parmenides
2) Plato
3) Galileo Galilei
4) Rene Descartes

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
26
Q

The four most important figures championing the use of experience in philosophy

A

1) Heraclitus
2) Aristotle
3) Francis Bacon

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
27
Q

“If I have seen far, it’s because I have stood on the shoulders of giants”

A

quote by Isaac Newton; highlights the social structure of science

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
28
Q

Empiricism

A

The idea that all knowledge comes from sense experience; Challenging rationalism;
Three big figures: Bishop George Berkley, David Hume, John Locke (the father of empiricism)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
29
Q

John Locke

A

Father of empiricism; Actively challenged metaphysical views and “innate ideas”

30
Q

Epistemology

A

the philosophical study knowledge

31
Q

The Tabula Rasa

A

“blak slate” The idea that we are born with an empty mind; Proposed by Locke

32
Q

External world skepticism

A

The problem born from Empiricism concerned with that because all we experience is sensations, we don’t know anything about the real world

33
Q

Logical positivism

A

Philosophy of science that dominated the early 20th C, after WWI

34
Q

Analytic and Synthetic propositions

A

Concepts developed by logical positivism;
Analytic propositions: Statements that are logically true
Synthetic propositions: Statements that are true because they describe the way something works in reality

35
Q

The verifiability theory of meaning

A

Anything that cannot be verified is meaningless;
Debunks external work skepticism

36
Q

Problem with positivism’s verificability theory of meaning

A

How can one verify the verificability theory of meaning?

37
Q

Quine

A

Wrote “two dogmas of empiricism”; Claimed that ideas precede testing anything

38
Q

Realism

A

Contender view for empiricism and positivism; things exist regardless of our observations

39
Q

Induction

A

forming general theories from specific observations; its conclusions are likely

40
Q

Deduction

A

forming specific conclusions from general premises; its conclusions are true

41
Q

The problem of induction

A

Proposed by Hume (one of the main empiricists); Points out that we can never see a law, only things that obey a law. “The future is under no obligation to mimic the past”

Example: Russel’s chicken.
A chicken gets fed by a farmer day after day. Is that a law of nature?

42
Q

Hypothetico-deductive method

A

A scientific hypotesis is confirmed when its logical consequences turn out to be true

43
Q

The ravens paradox

A

“All ravens are black”; Someone finds a yellow bird and it’s a chickadee. This indirectly counts as evidence for the first statement to some degree.
Generalisations need to take theory into account in order to make sense;
This theory needs to work holistically

44
Q

Goodman’s new riddle of induction

A

Data can support diffferent, sometimes, mutually exclusive theories

Grue - blue + green;

The strength of an argument depends on the language used to state the argument;
The same principle applies for being able to fit more than one model to one dataset

45
Q

Popper on induction

A

Popper (Austrian-British philosopher) claims science is not actually based on induction, but deduction.
He championed deduction and disregarded the value of induction.

46
Q

Popper on trial and error

A

Popper says we see patterns because we expect patterns;
In later observations the pattern can be refuted nonetheless, which is the nature of science

47
Q

Popper on hypotheses and observation

A

Popper says hypotheses come before observation, a “protohypothesis”

example:
Say to someone “observe” without saying what to observe

48
Q

Hume and Popper’s notes on dogmatism

A

Our protensity to look for regularities breeds dogmatic thinking; This needs to be abandoned and a critical thinking attitude must be adopted;

Dogmatic thinking will find a way to confirm a theory;

It’s important to be open to challenging one one’s theories

49
Q

Popper on what makes a theory scientific vs pseudoscientific

A

To be scientific, a theory has to be incompatible with certain possible results of observation (i.e., testable and falsifiable)

Note that despite Popper being right, falsifiability is not enough to consider a theory scientific.

50
Q

The problem with Popper’s view that science is purely deductive

A

Some scientific ideas are not falsifiable in a deductive way (e.g., evolution)

A theory that has been tested 100 times and not falsified is just as unfalsidied as a theory that has never been tested, but the former is at least likely.

51
Q

Is science inductive or deductive?

A

It’s mostly inductive. Its results are most often likely instead of absolute

52
Q

Is science inductive or deductive?

A

Most of the time it’s inductive; This is because scientific results are likey and never absolute.

53
Q

Paradigms and “normal science”

A

Kuhn made this distinction. Most science is problem-solving and uneventful, happening in a set of presuppositions and assumptions. This framework is called a paradigm.

54
Q

Kuhn on anomalies

A

Kuhn said that anomalies are not counter-examples to a theory.
Anomalies exist everyhere and are of a statistical nature.

On rare occassions, the anomalies won’t have a good explanaition. As anomalies accumulate, they can lead to a paradigm shift.

55
Q

Scientific revolution (concept and example)

A

Term coined by Kuhn, which refers to the scientific proces that results from accumulation of anomalies that can’t be explained, leading to a paradigm shift;

The Michelson-Morely experiment was an anomaly in the paradimg of light being trasnported by ether. It was never explained until Eintein’s theory of relativity. The whole process involved normal science, anomalies, crisis science and finaly led to a paradigm shift.

56
Q

Crisis science example

A

The Michelson-Morely experiment was an anomaly in the paradimg of light being trasnported by ether. It was never explained until Eintein’s theory of relativity. The whole process involved normal science, anomalies,

57
Q

Kuhn on the pattern of scientific knowledge accumulation

A

Contrary to the notion of scientific knowledge accumulating in a linear way, it is full of paradigm shifts; This was pointed out by Kuhn

58
Q

Main difference between Popper and Kuhn’s views on science

A

Popper criticized working inside a paradigmatic framework, while Kuhn championed it.

Kuhn argued that in order to do science, working within a paradigm based on cooperation and consensus is necessary (although one has to be open to change) to achieve progress.

I don’t need to spend time trying to disproof that beetles are insects.

59
Q

Kuhn on pardigm incommensurability

A

He said different paradigms are incommensurable (apples and oranges) and no data can decide between paradigms because data itself if collected under a paradigm (ladeness of observation)

60
Q

The theory of ladenness of observation

A

Before making an observation we have a prior theoretical framework of what we’re testing, thus, that framework is part of the observation; More simply put: observations themselves are affected by a particular theoretical framework.

I think of Boyd’s photo of wasps that had different sizes:
I said it could be different species (maybe hyperparasitoids); Kyle said maybe they were ants and they were drones and workers

61
Q

Kuhn’s 5 ways

A

Kuhn proposed 5 values for measuring the quality of a theory

1) accuracy (predictions matching observations)
2) consistency (within itself and other theories)
3) scope (applies for future data)
4) simplicity
5) fruitfulness (warrant future research)

Note these values are not easily measured in reality, and their weighing may not be straightforward

62
Q

The problem with pedagogy

A

The merits of defeated theory are not acknowledged

63
Q

Kuhn on the scientific method

A

Kuhn said that there is not one single scientific method, and that’s a good thing because it allows for creativity

64
Q

Lakatos

A

Hungarian philosopher that championed the readoption of reason in science

65
Q

“Research programs”

A

Coencept proposed by Lakatos; research programs are similar to Kuhn’s paradigms, but they can coexist within a discipline instead of being mutually-exclusive;

research programs consist of a hard core (i.e., essential aspects) and a protective belt (i.e., branching concepts);

The core is fixed, but the protective belt is flexible

66
Q

Lakatos on science/pseudoscience demarcation

A

In a good, progressive, research program, anomalies should increase its predictive power in an “updated version”.

A degenerating research science weakens with anomalies.

67
Q

Main difference between Lakatos and Popper

A

Lakatos acknowledged that theories have anomalies

68
Q

Strong inference

A

A concept developed by John Platt (1964) to describe an accumulative method of inductive inference. According to Platt it consists of 4 steps:

1) Developing alternative hypotheses
2) Devising an experiment with alternative possible outcomes
3) Carrying out a clean experiment
4) Repeat, making sequential hypotheses

Platt describes it as climing a tree from branch to branch (i.e., “inductive tree”)
According to plat, this is the main reason why molecular biology advances so fast

69
Q

Polanyi’s republic of science

A

republic of science (i.e., a community of independent tinkers cooperating) is analogous to a master-trainer system that maintains scientific standard in the criteria of:

plausibility, scientific value, originality

70
Q

Theory

A

a systematic statement of principles involved in a system

71
Q

Hypothesis

A

a proposed, unproved theory potentially explaining a system

72
Q

Model

A

a generalized representation of a system; a more specific version of a hypothesis

Candidacy (14 decks)

Brainscape helps you reach your goals faster, through stronger study habits.
© 2024 Bold Learning Solutions. Terms and Conditions