science inquiry - formulating research, participant selection & evaluation of research Flashcards
yr 11 unit 1
aim
identifies the purpose of the research in a concise statement of what the research is trying to find out
independent variable
condition the experiment manipulates
dependent variable
variable that is measured due to a change in the independent variable
controlled variables
do not change
extraneous variables
any variable other then the independent variable that can cause a change in the dependent variable
participant, extraneously
any way a participant varies from another participant (mood, intelligence)
environment, extraneously
aspects of the environment that can affect the participant (noise, temperature)
researcher, extraneously
characteristics of the researcher and the behaviour towards the participant
confounding variable
as a consequence of extraneous variables not being controlled, a confounding variable can make it impossible to determine a casual relationship between the independent and dependent variables
hypothesis (general)
testable prediction about the relationship between variables
directional hypothesis
predicts the nature and direction of the effect between the variables
non-directional hypothesis
predicts that the independent variable will have a directionless effect on the dependent variable
inquiry question
central question and multiple sub-questions to connect data
experimental research design
used to establish cause & effect relationships by manipulating variables. strengths of establishing a casual relationship, allows control of extraneous variables & prevents confounding variables. however may not be feasible or ethical
control group
a group of participants who are not affected by the independent variable in order to produce a measurable baseline
non-experimental research design
examines pre-existing relationship between two variables. observes and analyses trends. strengths of cheapness, can view naturally occurring situation that would be unethical/impractical to text. however cannot establish a casual relationship between variables
case study research design
an in depth study on the behaviour of an individual, usually with a unique condition. strengths are information provides considerable study and allows for descriptive information. however it cannot be generalised, and difficult to replicate
sample
smaller group of participants selected from the characteristics of the larger population
population
larger group of research interest from which a sample is drawn
convenience sampling
people that are readily available to the researcher, usually psychology students. allows for efficiency and a large sample when lacking funding, however makes it difficult to generalise and may not be representative
snowball sampling
current participants are asked to recruit more participants, usually when sample is hard to reach. strengths of increasing response rate and sample size, however it is weakened by being hard to generalise and creates privacy issues
random sampling
sample where every member of the population has an equal chance of being chosen
stratified sampling
puts the population into “stratas” or groups based on shared characteristics and a random sample is selected from each strata. strengths of representing a wider population and can be generalised. unfortunately is time consuming and difficulty.
quantitative data
numbered or categorical data, easily analysed. either objective or subjective data
qualitative data
data that describes change, usually expressed in words and is always subjective. rich detailed data that can be difficult to analyse
objective data
information that is observable, measurable, verifiable & free from personal bias
subjective data
based on personal opinion, interpretation, point of view, or judgement. provides insides into thoughts, but difficult to compare and is often biased or inaccurate
reliability
extent of consistent results of an assessment tool, reduces chances of outliers
internal reliability
whether a test is consistent within itself
external reliability
whether the measure is stable over time or between people
test-retest
consistency of results over time, given as the correlation
inter-rater
will the assessment tool yield the same result when used by a different experimenter?
validity
extent to which an assessment tool measures what it intends to measure
internal validity
validity of whether effects are due to the manipulation of the independent variable
external validity
extent to which results can be generalised
generalisability
extend to which results or findings are applicable to a broader population via controlling variables and being reliable & valid