Russia AOS1 Perspectives Flashcards
Collected Laws of the Russian Empire
Powers of the Tsar
‘The Emperor (Tsar) of all the Russians is an autocratic and unlimited monarch; God himself ordains that all must bow to his supreme power…’
Tsar = complete control over Russia = govt. affairs / small body adviser
Alexander iii
Competency of Tsar Nicholas
‘He is still absolutely a child, he has infanitle judgements’
Nicholas = unassuming & X best temperament for leader
Uncompromising
Tsar Nicholas ii -> brother-in-law
His own competency
‘What am I to do? I am not prepared to be Tsar. I know nothing of the business of ruling’
Nicholas admits own inadequacy & incompetence/inexperiance -> not ideal
The State and Revolution (1917): Lenin
Marxism-Leninism
‘organisation of the vanguard of the oppressed as the ruling class for the purpose of crushing the oppressors… expansion of democracy… first time becomes democracy for the poor, democracy for the people and not democracy for the rich… suppression by force…’
Transition from bourgeois control to proletariat control
Representatives (soviets) of the working & peasant class
Improved conditions
Exclusion of bourgeois thru suppression or force
Tsar Nicholas II to Witte
Demands for reform from Middle Class
‘I shall never, under any circumstances, agree to the representative form of government because i consider it harmful to the people whom God has entrusted to my care’
Highlights Tsar’s reactionary belief’s & ignorance regarding tensions
Inflaming the situation by refusing any meaningful reforms -> making revolution seem like the only viable option
Tsar Nicholas II
View of the Japanese in the face of war
‘The Japanese are infidels. The might of Holy Russia will crush them’
Racial element = European superiority -> Russia can’t lose b/c they’re European
Russia = ‘Holy’ b/c belief of Religious superiority
Minister of the Interior Plehv
View of war with Russia
‘a little victorious war to stem the tide of revolution’
Acknowledging revolutionary sentiments w/I Russia -> belief that war fix internal problems
Intention = replace revolutionary sentiments w patriotism & unite Russia under guise of war = common enemy
Communist Party of the Soviet Union history
View on Bloody Sunday
‘On that day the workers received a bloody lesson. It was their faith in the tsar that was riddled with bullets that day.’
Tsar name changed from ‘Little Father’ to ‘Bloody Nicholas’ = image on brutality & uncaring nature
Ppl abandon faith in Tsar in favour of radical political groups & solutions
International image = tarnished -> seen as murdering innocent civillians
Witte
Attempting to convince the Tsar to implement reforms
‘The slogan of “freedom” must become the slogan of government activity. There is no other way of saving the state.’
Nicholas was reluctant to concede to reforms because it went against his promised autocratic rule
Witte suspected that unless reforms were put in place, a revolution may take place
Trotsky
Impacts of the October Manifesto on the Tsarist system
‘Although there were a few broken ribs, tsarism came out of the experiance of 1905 alive and strong.’
Opposition to the government was divided so the workers and liberals were no longer working together
The military had been bought to remain loyal and were happy to continue supporting the Tsar
Promise of reform satisfied liberals whose opposition was quelled in the short term
Witte
Condemning the Duma
‘I have a constitution in my head, but as to my heart, I spit on it’
He holds little value in the Duma
He was forced to make the concessions to save Russia from a revolution
Tsar Nicholas
Opinion on Witte’s reforms
‘Curse the Duma. It’s all Witte’s fault’ & ‘As long as I live, I will never trust that man again with the smallest things. I had quite enough of last year’s experiment. It is still like a nightmare to me.’
Nicholas doesn’t see the Duma as necessary and is frustrated with its existence
He implements the Fundamental Laws to ensure his autocratic rule can continue.
He appoints his own loyal ministers, which undermines the representative aspect of the Parliament.
He creates Article 87 as a safeguard so he can dissolve the Duma and resume power when he sees fit.
Trotsky
In response to the limitations put on the Duma
‘A constitution is given, but the autocracy remains. Everything is given, and nothing is given.’
While the Duma itself was a significant reform, the limitations put in place rended it useless.
All laws needed Tsar’s approval.
Tsar could appoint his own ministers.
Tsar Nicholas
His purpose for the Duma
‘I created the Duma not to be directed by it, but to be advised.’
Nicholas wanted to maintain his autocratic rule
He implemented numerous limitations on the Duma so it would involve him in all decisions.
Stolypin
The Third Duma composition
‘responsible and statesmanlike people’
Electoral system only allowed conservatives & supporters of the Tsar to be elected into the Duma
Octobrist majority (154 seats) = supporters of Tsar
Stalin
Lena Goldfield Massacre
‘The Lena shots broke the ice of silence, the river of popular resentment is flowing again.’
Striking miners were shot by the government = reminiscient of Bloody Sunday -> has negative connotations.
Prompted increase in strike action over the next two years.
Octobrist Leader Guchkov
The reactionary government response to the strikes
‘a peaceful, painless transition from the old condemned system to a new order’ has failed.
Duma = supposed to peacefully implement reform but govt. reactionary response undermined peaceful relations.
Stolypin
Land reforms - creating the Kulaks
‘First of all, we have to create a citizen,** a small landowner**, and then the peasant problem will be solved.’
Peasants = lazy -> need a focus to motivate them
Stolypin
Reaction & Reform
‘Suppression first and then, and only then, reform’
Declared Martial Law when he became PM = executions & decrease freedoms
Land reforms = creation of Kulaks -> subservient peasant class to govt.
Pyotr Durnovo
Russia’s preparedness for war in 1914
‘(Russia’s preparations are) quite inadequate considering the unprecedented scale on which a future war will inevitably be fought… The network of strategic railways is inadequate. The railways… (are) sufficient, perhaps, for normal traffic, but not commensurate with the colossal demands… of a European war… the technical backwardness of our industries does not create favourable conditions for our adoption of the new inventions… there must **inevitably break out in the defeated country a social revolution **which, by the very nature of things, will spread.’
Railway was barely enough for normal traffic = food shortages X b/c of production but distribution
Industries X keep up with need during war = 42000 rifles/month but need 100000/month
Defeated country won’t survive social uproar = result in revolution