RPH MIDTERMS Flashcards
is debated by historians because of conflicting
accounts from different leaders and the lack of written records.
The date of the Cry of Pugad Lawin
is significant because it marked the beginning of the Philippine Revolution against Spanish rule
The Cry of Pugad Lawin
The main action associated with the Cry of Rebellion, according to historian Teodoro Agoncillo, was the ___________, symbolizing the rejection of Spanish oppression
Tearing of Cedulas
Teodoro Agoncillo defines the “___” as the decision to revolt, which was symbolized by the tearing of the cedulas after the Katipunan leaders agreed to rise against Spanish rule
Cry
also takes the “Cry” to mean the pagpupunit, but says it happened before the decision to revolt had been taken.
Isagani R. Medina
takes the “Cry” (the view)– the traditional view that KKK
veterans took, she says - that the “Cry” should mean the unang labanan.
Soledad Borromeo-Buehler
in the Philippines commemorates the sacrifices and contributions of Filipino heroes, particularly the events surrounding the Cry of Pugad Lawin.
National Heroes Day
in 1911 mentions the decision was made in Kangkong on August 23, 1896.
Pio Valenzuela’s account
Pio Valenzuela’s account in 1917 mentions Says the decision to revolt was taken by the General Assembly on August 23 at the house of Melchora Aquino on Daan malalim, “in Pasong Tamo, also known as ____
Pacpac-lawin
in his two separate accounts (1929 and 1957) places the Cry of Rebellion in Kangkong on August 26, 1896.
Guillermo Masangkay
recalls witnessing the debate in Kangkong but not the final decision.
Briccio Pantas
states the decision occurred in Kangkong on August 26, 1896.
Vicente Samson
asserts the first cry occurred at Kankong on August 26, 1896
Julio Nakpil
is the disagreement on the exact date and location
of the Cry. Different historical accounts, like those of Pio Valenzuela (August 23) and Guillermo Masangkay (August 26), place the Cry in different locations (e.g., Kangkong or Bahay Toro) on different dates. The lack of clear documentation fuels the confusion.
The controversy on Cry of Rebellion
in his account mentions that the decision was taken at
Kangkong, then moved to Pugad Lawin where the cedulas were torn.
Cipriano Pacheco (1933)
in his account that the decision taken at Kangkong on August 26.
Vicente Samson (1961)