RM - everything Flashcards

1
Q

Types of Experiments: Definitions (LAB)

A
  • high level of control over variables (DV/IV)
  • using standardised procedures
  • Manipulation of IV
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Types of Experiments: Eval good (LAB)

A
  • cause / effect established
  • high internal validity
  • easily replicated / can be reliable
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Types of Experiments: Eval Bad (LAB)

A
  • no ecological validity / lower external validity
  • lack mundane realism
  • Demand characteristics - pps know
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Types of Experiments: Definitions (FIELD)

A
  • less artificial environment
  • natural behaviour
  • IV changed
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Types of Experiments: Eval Good (FIELD)

A
  • pps act normal / higher ecological validity
  • more mundane realism
  • less DC
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Types of Experiments: Eval Bad (FIELD)

A
  • EV may influence / confound DV data
  • cannot randomly allocate - pps variables (indi diff)
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Types of Experiments: Definitions (Natural)

A
  • naturally occurring change of IV with DV measured
  • other variables cannot be controlled
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Types of Experiments: Eval Good (Natural)

A
  • research avoiding ethical issues
  • no DC - high external validity
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Types of Experiments: Eval Bad (Natural)

A
  • many EV / no cause and effect
  • no replication / cannot make reliable.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Types of Experiments: Definitions (Quasi)

A
  • no allocation of IV measurement
  • IV = innate to pps / gender / age
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Types of Experiments: Eval Good (Quasi)

A

only way of studying innate characteristics

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Types of Experiments: Eval Bad (Quasi)

A
  • may be other variables contributing to effect on DV = confounding
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

what are the 4 types of experiments

A
  • Lab
  • Field
  • Natural
  • Quasi
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What are the types of observation

A
  • naturalistic / controlled
  • participant / non- participant
  • covert / overt
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

observation definition

A

non experimental research - record behaviours - no manipulation of IV

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Observation: Definition (Controlled)

A

environment controlled - pps same experience

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Observation: Eval Good (Controlled)

A
  • control limits EV
  • standardised = reliable
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Observation: Eval Bad (Controlled)

A
  • contrived environment = less external validity
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Observation: Definition (Naturalistic)

A
  • real environment observation
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Observation: Eval Good (Naturalistic)

A
  • higher external validity
  • more generalisable
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

Observation: Eval Bad (Naturalistic)

A
  • EV = lower internal validity
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

Observation: Definitions (Overt)

A
  • pps aware of observation
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

Observation: Eval Good (Overt)

A
  • Ethical / informed consent
24
Q

Observation: Eval Bad (Overt)

A
  • DC / social desirability bias
25
Observation: Definition (Covert)
- pps not aware
26
Observation: Eval Good (Covert)
- No DC / SDB - higher external validity
27
Observation: Eval Bad (Covert)
- Ethical issues
28
Observation: Definition (Participant)
- researcher = present within observed group
29
Observation: Eval Good (Participant)
- rapport built = more disclosure
30
Observation: Eval Bad (Participant)
- less objective = skewed interpretation
31
Observation: Definition (Non-Participant)
- researcher = separate from group
32
Observation: Eval Good (Non-Participant)
- more objective
33
Observation: Eval Bad (Non-Participant)
- less rapport / less disclosure
34
Observational design: Definition
- choice of how and what behaviours are measured
35
Observational design: Operationalisation
- behavioural categorisation
36
Observational Design: definition (Time Sampling)
- records all relevant behaviour - at set points / intervals
37
Observational Design: Eval Good (Time Sampling)
- finds consistent behaviours
38
Observational Design: Eval Bad (Time Sampling)
- misses behaviours not in set times
39
Observational Design: Definition (Event sampling)
- records everything that happens
40
Observational Design: Eval Good (Event sampling)
- most behaviours will be recorded - as long as it's operationalised
41
Observational Design: Eval Bad (Event sampling)
- misses non operationalised behaviour
42
Observations - Assessing Reliability: issues with bias
researchers == subjective interpretation of behaviours
43
Observations - Assessing Reliability: inter-rater reliability
- 2 / more observers - conducted separately / same conditions / test correlation for similarity (0.8) = good
44
what are the types of Self-Report techniques
- questionnaires - interviews structured / unstructured
45
46
46
46
46
47
47
47
48
49
49
50