Reviewing Theories and Perspectives Flashcards
Reviewing Theories and Perspectives : Realism
Describes a foreign policy that’s determined by a country’s security and economic interest.
Reviewing Theories and Perspectives : Idealism
Describes a foreign policy that is determined by a country’s ideals, moral values, and principals.
Realism vs Idealism
What do nations want?
Realism - Power
Idealism -Peace in the world according to principles defined by nation.
Realism vs Idealism
What are nations motivated by?
Realism - Self-Interest
Idealism - Values, principles
Realism vs Idealism
What is the source of conflict in the world?
Realism - Competing Interests (territory, resources)
Idealism - Competing “isms” (democracy vs monarchy, totalitarianism or communism).
Realism vs Idealism
What is the Source of security?
Realism - Faith in power to protect the nation.
Idealism - Faith in law or morality to protect the nation.
First Great Debate
- Also known as the “realist idealist great debate
- Was a dispute between idealists and realist
- Took place in the 1930’s and 1940’s
- Was fundamentally about how to deal with Nazi Germany
- Idealist emphasized the possitibility of international institutions such as the League of Nations.
- Realist scholars emphasized anarchical nature of international politics and the need for state survival.
Second Great Debate
- Dispute between “scientific IR”
- scholars who sought to refine scientific methods of inquiry in international relations theory who insisted on a more historicist/interpretative approach to international relations theory.
- Debate is termed “realists vs behaviorist” or “traditionalism vs scientism”.
Inter-Paradigm Debate
- Sometimes is considered to be a great debate and therefore called the “third great debate”.
- Debate between Liberalism, realism and radical international relations theories.
- Also has been described as being between realism, institutionalism and structuralism.
Fifth Great Debate
- Could concern critical realism but goes on to say that better not because the first four debates were pointless affairs.
- Steve smith argues that it is difficult to find any notion of a fifth debate in literature
Great Debates : criticism
- Steve Smith has argued that the differing positions have largely ignored each other meaning that it makes little sense to talk of debates between rival theoretical frameworks.
Great debates : times
First Debate - 1920’s-1930’s
Second Debate- 1950’s-1960’s
Third Debate- 1980’s
Fourth Debate-1990’s
Classical Realism
HUMAN NATURE
Thucydides (The Peloponnesian War) – International politics is driven by an endless struggle for power, which has its roots in human nature.
Structural Realism
INTERNATIONAL SYSTEM
Rousseau (The state of War) – It is not Human nature but the anarchical system that fosters fear, jealousy, suspicion and insecurity.
Neoclassical Realism
Zakaira (From Wealth To Power) – Systemic account of world politics provided by structural realism is incomplete. It needs to be supplemented with better accounts of unit-level variables such as how power is perceived, and how leadership is exercised.
Liberalism
- Historic alternative to realism
- After the cold war was dominant till 9/11
- Values and institutions embedded in Europe and North America
- Power politics is the product of ideas
• Four-dimension definition: Juridically equal,
legislative, Liberty of the individual, economic.
- Interventionist foreign policies and stronger internationa institutions x pragmatic conception: toleration and no intervention
- Critics: they do not see non-western cultures